WHEN WILL FICAC TAKE GANESH CHAND INTO CUSTODY? Coming soon: How Chand and FNU Council criminally siphoned off over $250,000 from FNU coffers to pay for Filipe Bole's NZ medical bills!
4 Comments
JUDAS TO BE SENT PACKING: Fijileaks informed that Kubuabola's 1987 coup conspirator Isikeli Mataitoga, Fiji's present Ambassador to Japan, will be kicked out of his job for foul-mouthing the FFP led Government! A LENGTHY investigation by Fijileaks Investigation Team into the former i-Taukei Movement leader, the racist Ratu Inoke Kubuabola, the present Fijian Foreign Minister has resulted in some unexpected findings. The Team found that he did not dip into FijiFirst Party coffers for election funding to fight the September general election. What Is New "PINK Pussycat"?
"Mary Hell" for Pupils: Fareed allegedly claimed Bainimarama's wife Mary sent in military goons to interrogate the primary students about iPad! Bula Vinaka Nouzab Fareed, I have taken the liberty to cc all FHL & Fiji TV board members, FHL Class B Shareholders, Hari Punja & Sons Shareholders & Acting PS, PM's Office & the Co Secs of both Companies including the Acting CEO of Fiji TV. Acting PS PM's Office - please ensure that the Hon Prime Minister, Ratu Josaia Bainimarama MP is given the copies of our email last week & the one today Fareed, I had clearly told you that whenever a false, wrong & LYING statement comes out from you, I will release the TRUTH. Given that you are the G/CEO of a Taukei public listed institution, the FHL board members including the FHL Class B Shareholders must be made fully aware of all wrong, illegal,unethical, un-truthful and unrighteousness statements, acts & conducts that you make. The board members have a legal fiduciary duty to act upon a serious allegation which is made against you given that you are heading an institution that advises its shareholders on investments. Their failure to act against you is negligence on their part. The 74 page report is already clear evidence of serious misconduct against you which they should have acted upon - not withstanding as well my email to you all last week. This email is in response to the Fiji TV Media Release dated 5th February, 2015. There were 8 listed paragraphs in the Fiji TV statement, we will address & respond to each & everyone. 1. Fiji TV para 1 : Fiji TV categorically refutes allegations of wrong doing which have been alleged by two former employees, Tanya Waqanika & Tevita Gonelevu Gonelevu & Waqanika response : We stand by our detailed 74 page report with supporting evidence to the Hon Prime Minister and all those copied in the report. The report is circulated through out Govt, all Members of Parliament, Military, Private Sector, all Fijians in Fiji & abroad. Copies are also with the Senior Police detectives that took our Police Statements on Tuesday, 3rd Feb, 2015. 2. Fiji TV para 2 : The decision to terminate the two employees or pressure was made by a duly constituted Board of Fiji TV without any interference, direction of the Attorney General, Hon Aiyaz Sayed - Khaiyum, Solicitor General, Sharvada Sharma and Acting Senor Legal Officer, Tupou Baravilala. Gonelevu & Waqanika response : Duly Constituted Fiji TV board meeting- we stand by our statement (you must remember, Gonelevu & Waqanika have also done extensive Company Secretary work for FHL & Fiji TV respectively & are well versed with processes & procedures of Board Meetings, AGMs, Articles of Associations, etc) and we stand by our statements that there was no proper constituted board when our employment contracts were terminated - refer you to the Fiji TV Articles. You see, once the Fiji TV board members are summoned to a Court of Law, they have a moral,ethical & legal obligation to swear & state under oath, the truth on this issue & also the items that were discussed in the FHL boardroom on our removal. To state otherwise is perjury and this is a criminal offense. On a personal & professional level, your fellow FTV board members will not lie to save another lie given that they have their own families, children, profession, dignity & their own integrity to state the truth unlike YOU!!. 3. Fiji TV para 3 : Furthermore, the decision by FTV to sub - license its exclusive rights with regards to Rugby Events was taken exclusively by FTV & there was no interference, direction & pressure by the the Attorney General, Solicitor General & Tupou Baravilala. 3.1 It was always clear to the Fiji TV Board and Executives including the current Content Manager, Karen Lobendahn that we were never going to breach the Decree. This is recorded in the meeting meetings taken by Siwatibau & Sloan (Fiji TV Annexure 2). It was always clear as well that if FBC failed to pay Fiji TV, the feed will never go to them given that we all had a legal fiduciary duty to protect Fiji TV and its shareholders. We know of the Judases that leaked information to AG on this issue - their conduct tantamount to summarily dismissal. Only 2 people at FTV were given all my corresponding emails to WR - once their emails surfaces, again it will reconfirm the Judas that leaked Fiji TV company information to the AG. 3.2 Fiji TV letter of 3rd Dec - I refer your lying memory again to page 7 of our report. Gonelevu, Waqanika, Naiveli & Roxburgh will not lie when we saw with our own eyes when AG himself pulled out the hard copy letter and stated equivocally that Fiji TV will sign the letter - totally against Fiji TV & its shareholders interest. The same letter was emailed from Tupou Baravilala to Fiji TV - we all saw it. Unless you are now suffering from dementia,we all witnessed the unethical conduct of the AG in front of the Fiji TV team and SG & Tupou Baravilala. 4. Fiji TV para 4 : Any decision taken by FTV or any correspondence issued by FTV was solely a decision by FTV, in the best interest of the company. Gonelevu & Waqanika response : Refer your lying memory to Fiji TV annexure 11 where Fiji TV board member, Gary Callaghan (pages 65 - 67) clearly states that your conduct including Naiveli was not in the interest of Fiji TV. The original sub license agreement which was prepared by the Fiji TV team with Fiji TV external solicitors, Siwatibau & Sloan, was circulated to everyone including you for your approval- YOU ALL APPROVED. The 2nd sub - license agreement which was not prepared (internal), discussed, viewed & approved by Fiji TV board which you & Naiveli went & signed with FBC was clearly not in the interest of Fiji TV. These copies will be surely be submitted in a Court of Law - your signed contractual version is not in commercial favor to Fiji TV. FHL board members & Class B FHL board members, we urge you to call for these 2 contracts & have a look at it. Your FHL CEO & Chairperson FHL did not act in the interest of the FHL Shareholders. These are serious legal implications & consequences which has affected FHL shares. 5. Fiji TV para 5 : FTV was not at any time coerced by the Attorney General, Solicitor General or any other officer. Gonelevu & Waqanika response : Refer your lying memory again to page 7 & 8 of our Report. We also refer you to Fiji TV 1 (your SMS to me clearly stating AG's instructions to you). Please note that Gonelevu also received the same SMS including the Fiji TV board members. We also refer you to annexure Fiji TV 6 - your emails to the Fiji TV board members & Executives clearly stating the directive from the AG. If you are stating otherwise as signed by the press release of 5th Feb, 2015 - are you now stating for the record "that you were in fact LYING & IMPERSONATING the AG all along when you sent the SMS & emails to the Fiji TV board & Executives"??? Impersonation is a criminal offence (s356 Crime Decree) & carries a sentence of 1 year imprisonment. If this is so - your entire conduct is malicious & damaging to Fiji TV!!! 6. Fiji TV para 6 : Fiji TV categorically refutes allegations made by the two former employees with respect to sharing of the Rugby events and state such statements are clearly malicious, emotional & without any basis. Gonelevu & Waqanika response : All our recorded statements & the 74 page report since our employment termination have been made to protect Fiji TV & its people. Waqanika does admit that she did a FB posting where she clearly states that it would be in the best interest of an advertiser to advertise solely with Fiji TV for all WR events given that the feed from WR only goes to FTV. FTV will only release the feed to FBC upon FULL payment prior to each leg of the WR 7s series. Failure to pay by FBC will result in the feed not going & the advertiser runs a commercial risk. Secondly, Waqanika clearly stated that Fiji TV has a "widem & better coverage reach than FBC which adds value to an advertisers product. Coverage & Reach of all three broadcasters is detailed in our 74 page report. Given that you have used the words 'malicious & emotional', you have forced my hand to reveal 2 issues outside the scope of this email : a) our telephone conversations between Waqanika/Fareed prior to your confirmation as CEO FHL. You called me & expressed your concerns & disappointment that you were still the Acting CEO FHL. We discussed a lot of things but the one I clearly remember to this day & which I have shared with a few people was your request to me that the Fiji TV newsroom cover the story of the the Yat Sen Students that were taken to the police station for questioning as a result of a missing laptop/ipad. Your children are current students of the school. You mentioned in detailed the involvement of the Hon PM's wife sending soldiers, etc to the school...it certainly would have been a traumatic experience for any child or school for that matter. The owner of this missing item is one of the Hon PM's granddaughter. Their mother & Na Levu, unbeknown to you & many, are friends of mine till today (marama nite). I told you on the phone - "when it comes to children, regardless of whose child or grandchild, it is a "No go Zone for the media". Fiji TV did not cover the story. b) The removal of Carl Ngamoki - Cameron : whilst the FHL board meeting was still going in & when it was decided that Carl be removed, you called me & our newsroom & requested for media coverage immediately outside FHL foyer (I could hear the board members still discussing board matters), by then our newsroom including other reporters were making there way to FHL). You whispered on your cell that Carl's FHL board membership was terminated forthwith. Your actions & conduct on that day shows your unprofessionalism. Your loyalty is only to yourself & no other, which we had clearly recorded in our last Fiji TV Executive/Management meeting with you. I have no doubt that if any of your FHL, Fiji TV or AG himself is removed - the media can always count on you to give the inside scoop. c) Frankjosh email : former FHL board members and perhaps some current ones have confirmed you tabling email directives from this email address. One former FHL board member told us that one of the directives was to confirm you as CEO FHL. 7. Fiji TV para 7 : These statements are a clear indication of disgruntled former employees as a result of decision taken by FTV in the best interest of the company Gonelevu & Waqanika response : We have to state the FACT in its entire truth and righteousness. Perhaps our dismissal was in your best interest but why was Gonelevu & Waqanika the only 2 Executives singled out? Why did you not remove the current Head of Corporate/Finance (whom who deployed from FHL to join FTV) who has breached Fiji TV policy - I had told him off in the presence of other Fiji TV Executives that the giving of SKY Pacific complimentary to a gym which he is a member of and not declaring his interest was dishonest. Also the mere fact that the Gym was not an advertiser with Fiji TV compared to USP & Fiji Sports Council was ethically wrong. You knew about this because I had discussed with you prior to my removal. He was one of the Judases which you confirmed to me on email. His performance reflects in Fiji TV's financial results for FY 2013/14 - a LOSS!! 8. Fiji TV para 8 : Perhaps the employees should refer to their employment contact which is clear on terms of engagement & termination Gonelevu & Waqanika response : We have read our contracts & we agree that Fiji TV can invoke the "no Cause Provision" but the right to a fair hearing & natural justice/process was not accorded to us, something that we will discuss further in Court. If the same provision is also in your current employment contract & given the damaging, serious & overwhelming employment & criminal breaches committed by you - I challenge the FHL board to invoke the same clause on you as well immediately. Conclusion Just some questions, which we pose to you?
We have already lodged our complaints to Central Police Station. We will also lodge the same against you. In my personal view, no other Fiji TV board members are liable for criminal prosecution, but I may be wrong. I am no criminal lawyer expert. However, in terms of civil proceedings - the FTV/FHL individual board members will be a party to our claim. I will liaise with Lateef & Lateef this morning & our on going shortfall salary payout & my bonus which we are legally entitled too. Hopefully, we get some good news today Personal note : when it comes to LIES from you, Gonelevu & Waqanika will spiritually discern it as God's children. Further, the Taukeis who are all copied on this email know the traditional links & ties of our noble mothers from the Vanua, Rewa - Ro Elenoa Cuanilawa Gonelevu, Marama Roko Tui Matai from Burebasaga, Rewa & Ro Luisa Waqanika (nee Buresova ), Marama Sauturaga & Yavusa Vasu, Lomanikoro Rewa - o rau na marama veimataki. As part Rewans - we will always catch a LIE. My mother is a full blood Rewan so any BS that comes out of your mouth - I will catch you. Pardon my French. I am a "bati" as well from Natumua, Tavuki, Kadavu - we will always battle,overcome & conquer. Adi Elenoa - can you please forward this email to Mr Kurusiga. Vinaka Vakalevu & Blessed Weekend. "The Taukeis who are all copied on this email know the traditional links & ties of our noble mothers from the Vanua, Rewa - Ro Elenoa Cuanilawa Gonelevu, Marama Roko Tui Matai from Burebasaga, Rewa & Ro Luisa Waqanika (nee Buresova ), Marama Sauturaga & Yavusa Vasu, Lomanikoro Rewa - o rau na marama veimataki. As part Rewans - we will always catch a LIE. My mother is a full blood Rewan so any BS that comes out of your mouth - I will catch you. Pardon my French. I am a "bati" as well from Natumua, Tavuki, Kadavu - we will always battle,overcome & conquer." FICAC DAMNED: We will also reveal how Chand and Prasad misused FNU funds in conspiracy with FNU Council to illegally pay over $250,000 for Frank Bainimarama's then Education Minister Filipe Bole's NZ medical bills! Education Minister Mahendra Reddy party to FRAUD! That is why Reddy was phoning FICAC to keep him up to date about case; We will also reveal how two FNU Council Members 'shopped' the whistle blower to Chand who immediately sacked him from FNU! PRINTING MONEY: We will also reveal how Chand and his brother Pradeep Lal, when Chand became the VC of FNU, changed the printing entity from a company to a trading trust in which the BROTHERS were major beneficiaries. Chand then gave Finance and all the Deans to buy all printing items from their companyWAS Chand's successor, the acting VC Professor Ian Rouse, BLACKMAILED by Chand and Prasad to allow Prasad to take lengthy leave and flee to New Zealand, otherwise they would reveal Rouse's own alleged MISUSE of FNU Credit Cards?
Subject: CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL REMEDIES Dear staff, As part of the University’s goal of achieving excellence, our Strategic Plan recognizes the importance of strong internal processes and systems in the areas of governance, management and administration. To this end, members of staff are reminded that they must use the proper University channels and processes to resolve any grievances or internal differences that may arise and that they must do this on a confidential basis. Grievances and other matters of internal administration should never be raised outside of the proper University channels and should never be shared outside of the University. These requirements arise out of every staff member’s duty of loyalty to their employer, the University, and their duty not to act in a manner which brings the University into disrepute. They also arise out of the obligation which each of us has to our colleagues and fellow staff members to have adequate regard for their welfare and to avoid acting in ways that would unfairly harm their reputation, work or prospects. The obligations are reflected in the Staff Ordinance, the Ordinance for the Discipline of Academic and Professional Staff and the Code of Professional Conduct for Academic Staff but they are implied duties for every staff member whether academic, comparable or otherwise. Harmonious and cooperative working relationships are the normal expectation. In the event that there is a conflict, we must work hard to resolve the matter. The first step is to deal with the matter with the other person. Done seriously most conflicts can be resolved in this way. If a conflict is not resolved in that way and a party feels the need to take it further, then the prescribed appeal or other conflict resolution procedure for the particular kind of grievance should be followed. If there is no prescribed procedure, a grievance should then be raised with the staff member’s supervisor. If the grievance is not resolved by the supervisor to the staff member’s satisfaction, it may thereafter be raised in writing as appropriate with the next level of management with a copy to the other party to the grievance. Except for a complaint of misconduct against the Vice Chancellor and President (or his delegate) and thereafter, in appropriate cases, the University Visitor. Staff members must not raise any grievance over administrative or staff matters directly with the University’s Executive Committee or Council as these are governance entities. The Executive Council and Council have made it clear in the recent past that staff members should not write to the Executive Committee or Council and that the Vice Chancellor and President is wholly responsible for the matters of management. At its meeting on 14 April 2014, the Executive Committee re-emphasized this. The Executive Committee also expects management to strengthen policies and procedures to ensure compliance with this principle. Therefore, staff members must ever communicate directly with the members of the University’s Executive Committee or Council over any matter. A breach of these requirements may amount to ‘misconduct’ or ‘gross misconduct’ and may give rise to disciplinary action (including possible, in serious cases, dismissal). Staff Ordinance: http://www.policies.usp.ac.fj/index.php?docid=4841 Discipline Ordinance : http://www.policies.usp.ac.fj/index.php?docid=3361 Visitor Ordinance: http://www.policies.usp.ac.fj/index.php?docid=4832 Code of Processional Conduct : http://www.policies.usp.ac.fj/index.php?docid=4125 THE FLAG OF FIJI The current flag of Fiji was adopted on 10 October 1970. The state arms have been slightly modified but the flag has remained the same as during the colonial period. It is a defaced sky-blue "Blue Ensign" (the actual Blue Ensign version of the flag is the Government ensign). It has remained unchanged since Fiji was declared a republic in 1987, despite calls from some politicians (such as Opposition Senator Atu Emberson-Bain) for changes. Design Its bright blue background symbolizes the Pacific Ocean, which plays an important part in the lives of the islanders, both in terms of the fishing industry, and the huge tourist trade. The Union Jack reflects the country's links with the United Kingdom. The shield is derived from the country's official coat of arms, which was originally granted by Royal Warrant in 1908. It is a white shield with a red cross and a red chief (upper third of a shield). The images depicted on the shield represent agricultural activities on the islands, and the historical associations with the United Kingdom. At the top of the shield, a British lion holds a cocoa pod between its paws. The upper left is sugar cane, upper right is a coconut palm, the lower left a dove of peace, and the lower right a bunch of bananas. The current flag is very similar to the colonial ensign used prior to independence, the main differences being the latter used a darker shade of blue and displayed the entire Fijian coat of arms as opposed to just the shield. While some reformists have called for the removal of the Union Flag, seeing it a British colonial emblem, others support its retention for the sake of historical continuity. The flags of three other independent countries (Australia, New Zealand, and Tuvalu) currently retain the Union Flag in their national flags. Full Fijian Coat-of-Arms Some influential Fijians have called for the restoration of the full coat of arms to the flag. On 30 November 2005, Fiji's Great Council of Chiefs called for the two warrior figures, who guard the shield on the coat of arms, to be placed on the flag, along with a miniature canoe and the national motto, Rerevaka na kalou ka doka na tui ("Fear God and honour the Queen") — symbols that were featured on the original flag of the Kingdom of Viti, the first unified Fijian state created under the leadership of Seru Epenisa Cakobau in 1871. "The coat of arms is very significant because it has the word of God, then it has the two warriors and the Fijian canoe also. I think that the council members prefer that the full coat of arms be included in the Fiji flag," said Asesela Sadole, General Secretary of the Great Council of Chiefs. Prior to ceding the country to British rule in 1874, the government of Fiji adopted a national flag featuring blue and white vertical stripes, with in the centre a red shield depicting a white dove.[1] This flag ceased to be used when the colonial era began and Fiji relinquished its independence. Fiji was a British colony from 1874 to 1970. Proposal for a new flag In his New Year's Day address in 2013, Prime Minister Commodore Frank Bainimarama announced that the flag would soon be changed so as "to reflect a sense of national renewal, to reinforce a new Fijian identity and a new confidence in being Fijian on the global stage". The change in the flag would accompany the adoption of a new Constitution, intended by Fiji's military leader (who came to power in a coup in December 2006) to establish a "one person, one vote", non-racial and secular democracy under military oversight. The country, a republic, had removed the Queen from its currency a few weeks earlier. On 3 Febuary 2015, Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama said the flag of Fiji will be replaced. A national competition to design the new flag will be held, with the aim of hoisting it on 11 October 2015, the 45th anniversary of independence. Source: Wikipedia An independent kingdom prior to becoming a British colony in 1874, Fiji briefly used a national flag of white and blue vertical stripes with a red central shield bearing a white dove. That symbol was derived from the flags of Christian missionaries who had visited the area. Under British rule the usual flags were introduced—the Union Jack for government buildings, the British Red Ensign for private vessels, and the British Blue Ensign for government vessels. The local badge of the colony was put at the centre of the fly end of the Blue Ensign to distinguish it from similar flags used in other colonies. That badge was based on the Fiji coat of arms established in 1908. Its shield contained the red cross of St. George on a white background below another English symbol, a yellow lion on red. However, the lion held a cacao pod, and local symbols (sugarcane, coconuts, bananas, and the Fiji dove) were placed between the arms of the cross. In anticipation of independence, Fiji held a competition to develop a national flag. Familiarity with the old design and close links with other Pacific countries (especially Australia and New Zealand) led to the selection of a modified version of the colonial flag. The only changes introduced when the nation became independent on October 10, 1970, were the substitution of light blue for dark in the field of the flag and the omission of the crest, motto, and supporters in the coat of arms, allowing the shield to be larger and more easily visible. No further changes were made during the period (1987–97) that Fiji was separated from the Commonwealth. Whitney Smith, Director, Flag Research Center, Winchester, Massachusetts. Author of The Flag Book of the United States and Flags and Arms Across the World. STATEMENT [8/2/2015] UNIFY OUR PEOPLE FIRST, FIX OUR BROKEN DEMOCRACY SECOND, GET SERIOUS ABOUT TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY THIRDLY, BEFORE WE THINK ABOUT A NEW FLAG THAT CAN REFLECT THESE POSITIVE CHANGES The decision by the Prime Minster to change Fiji’s flag is the latest example of a Parliamentary dictatorship at work. There has been no call from the people for our long established flag to be thrown on the national scrap heap. The Prime Minister himself says it is widely loved and admired. Why then is he bent on getting rid of it? He is obviously unaware of the contradictions in his thinking. This is just a continuation of the dictatorial decisions of the 8 year rule of the Khaiyum–Bainimarama Government. But now it operates under the guise of a ‘new democracy’. This Khaiyum-Bainimarama democracy involves undemocratic decision making followed by attempts to create a semblance of inclusivity for an outcome that has already been decided. The Chiefs and people of Fiji have a long and historic relationship with Great Britain and the British Crown which is reflected in our current flag. The majority of our people treasure these links with Great Britain and its monarchy. This is one of the reasons why the flag, in the words of the Prime Minister, is widely loved and admired. There are also our very close ties through our former and current troops who are members of the British Army, our proud fighting history with the forces of Great British in times of conflict from the First World War to the present day. We are held in high regard internationally through these relationships that mean something to the majority of us. Lest we forget, it was the British who introduced English to these Islands, is Prime Minster Bainimarama suggesting we also remove this link to our colonial past? Important symbols like a national flag should only be changed if some momentous circumstances warrant it and after a wide national conversation leading to a referendum. The tragic and disturbing reality is there for all to see when the Prime Minister calls for new symbols that ‘reflect our present state as a nation’. If he had thought about this carefully, he would see that momentous events that have had the greatest impact on our country and its well being are military coups and their disastrous consequences. He knows a great deal about this. So what symbols for treason and traitors can we use that would truthfully reflect our history of military takeovers? Should we include guns, handcuffs, truncheons, and other implements used to suppress the people, physically abuse them and deny then their human rights? Now Prime Minister Bainimarama and his government intend to deny our citizens the right to have a say in whether or not our much loved flag should be changed. He and Mr Khaiyum must learn to exercise their authority in a genuinely inclusive, transparent and accountable manner. Otherwise we will continue to live in a fake democracy. First they need to unify the people, and then they must get serious about democratic principles, transparency and accountability. Authorized By Ratu Isoa Tikoca February 4th 2015 Opposition Whip "This government still attaches our Indo Fijian community to colonial history. The preamble describes Indians as descendants of indentured labourers from British India. What nonsense.This is insulting. India was a British Colony, So was Fiji and many other countries under the rule of the British Empire. Therefore the preamble basically describes Indo-Fijians as British Indians! If anything has to be changed, then it is the preamble that is injurious to the Indo-Fijian community because it is reminder of our Girmit and not the choice of our forefathers who chose to make Fiji their only home after completion of the indenture period in 1916." NFP StatementPuppet's Xmas Gift to His Master: 45 Departments & 9 Ministries! Fiji First Party (The Real One) has just posted a comment on your blog post, BULLY for BENDING (JUST): Khaiyum scraps objection sections from 'TV Rugby Decree" but another Decree reveal he's in CONTROL of 45 Departments & 9 Ministerial Portfolios- refuses to SHARE with others!, and you need to approve it:
Note of FACT:- - the biggest, most famous ( and most pitiable) Intellectual Property Thief (CHOR) ever to emerge, so, so, shamelessly, in the whole history of our country – CHOR Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum is also the Minister responsible for protecting / promoting Intellectual Property and Copy Rights. What a Joke and What hypocrisy! We won’t trust this dishonorable CHOR Khaiyum with anything – simply because he is a CHOR. |
editor@fijileaks.comARCHIVES
September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 |