2 Comments
FIJILEAKS says the real culprit is Frank Bainimarama, the leader of the "Fiji Theft Party" who engaged with Ratu Timoci Vesikula in a frank and forthright discussion at the Tailevu Provincial Council meeting. What is the Fiji state-controlled MIDA telling us, that the contents of the exchanges should have remained hushed up by Fiji TV and other media organisations? Did Bainimarama stop Vesikula from making the so-called "Hate Speech"? COME ON, charge Bainimarama (and Vesikula) but LEAVE FIJI TV alone! Thanks to Fiji TV MIDA's Ashwin Raj knows what Vesikula said to Bainimarama and about the Indo-Fijians in Fiji! Welcome to new Fiji and OLD TAILEVU, Bainimarama! “Please do not vote for me because I’m from Tailevu, but vote for what I’m doing for the nation.” - Bainimarama to Tailevu Provincial Council. MIDA says no to "water and kerosene" hate speech By Apisalome Rabo The Fiji Media Industry Development Authority has today ruled that comments made by Tailevu’s Ratu Timoci Vesikula were quote “nothing short of hate speech and in breach of the Bill of Rights provisions in the Fiji Constitution,” unquote. Therefore MIDA has also ruled that Fiji One News has breached the Media Decree’s code of ethics. MIDA is now seeking a legal opinion on whether to impose a fine under section 24 of the Media Industry Development Decree which could amount to 25 thousand dollars in the case of an editor or up to 100 thousand dollars for the organisation. The Chairman says Ratu Timoci Vesikula’s speech also contravened Section 65 of the 2009 Crimes Decree Urging Political Violence or inciting communal violence. “My decision this morning cannot be construed as an impingement on the freedom of expression or dismissed as yet another instance of gagging media freedom my MIDA as has been insinuated by some who are posturing as the praetorian guard of human rights but sadly very quiet over the issue of hate speech.” said Raj. Raj also cited Section 66 which relates to seditious intention, to raise discontent or disaffection and to promote feeling of ill-will and hostility between different classes of the population of Fiji. “Fiji Television in giving unfettered prominence to Ratu Timoci Vesikula’s speech, has failed to comply with SCHEDULE 1 (Section [18 (1)]) Media Code of Ethics and Practice provisions of the 2010 Media Industry Development Decree.” said Raj. Further on, he Raj explained that while section 17 of the Constitution guaranteed free speech, it is limited – also coming with responsibilities… Quoting 17(2) of the 2013 Constitution, Raj said: 17(2) crucially proscribe the following: Freedom of speech, expression and thought, opinion and publication does not protect (a) Advocacy of hatred that- i) Is based on any prohibited ground of discrimination listed or prescribed under section 26: and ii) Constitutes incitement to cause harm And imperative in preserving: 17 (3) to the extent that this is necessary, a law may limit or may authorize the limitation of, the rights and freedoms mentioned in subsection (1) in the interest of – (a) National security, public safety, public order, public morality, public health or the orderly conduct of elections: (b) The protection or maintenance of the reputation, privacy, dignity, rights or freedoms or other persons, including the right to be free from hate speech, whether directed against individuals or groups He adds that while media organization are free to report and comment on all matters of public interest, it is their duty not to publish or broadcast material in a form likely to promote or encourage communal hatred or discord. “While MIDA recognizes that it remains Government’s prerogative to execute legal proceedings against Ratu Timoci Vesikula for inciting hatred and racial ill-will, it will be closely monitoring the tenor of public discourse in the lead up to elections and the role of the media in this process. This will be a key task of the media-monitoring unit,” said Raj. Maintaining the authority’s independence from government and any political party, Raj said MIDA will stringently deal with media outlets that continue to breach the law. “In the interest of transparency, the Authority will require full translation of speeches and texts presented in the vernacular at all political rallies and forum and it is incumbent upon the media in Fiji to ensure that there is no dissonance in the content of speeches and texts presented either in the vernacular or English in their various modes of delivery.” MIDA will seek further legal advice on the possibility of imposing a fine against Fiji TV. Source: https://twitter.com/RachnaFijiTV/status/451623606749917184/photo/1 SELECTIVE REPORTING: Did Fiji Sun journalists fall into a coma at the Tailevu Provincial Council meeting or chose NOT to report what Ratu Timoci Vesikula said about Indo-Fijians in Fiji to Frank Bainimarama?
It has been clearly established that the proposed Fiji First Party is not using the Fiji Coat of Arms. The Fiji National Coat of Arms consists of the images of two Fijian warriors on either side of a shield and the motto “Rerevaka na Kalou ka Doka na Tui” below the shield. The shield from the coat of arms has the image of a lion holding a cocoa pod across the top, sugarcane, a coconut palm and bunch of bananas are represented in three of the shield’s sections. The fourth contains the reproduction of a dove of peace, the main feature of the Cakobau Government’s flag before cession. The proposed party is using the shield displayed on the Fijian flag. When questioned by Fijivillage, Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum said claims that the proposed Fiji First Party is using the Fiji Coat of Arms are misleading. Sayed-Khaiyum said people who are making the claims may be just seeking publicity. The United Front for a Democratic Fiji which is made up of SODELPA, NFP, Fiji Labour Party and the Fiji Islands Council of Trade Unions said it will not change its stand that the Prime Minister’s proposed Fiji First Party is using the Fiji Coat of Arms. When questioned by Fijivillage, UFDF spokesperson Mick Beddoes admitted that only parts of the Coat of Arms have been used by the proposed Fiji First. But he said the proposed political party’s intentions are clear. Source: Fijiivillage News; Fijileaks Editor: Oddly, Fijivillage had not reported UFDF's original statement regarding the Coat of Arms but ran to Khaiyum for comments; neither did it use the photo (see above) which proves to the contrary. Ballot DECREE WILL INSULT MODESTY OF WOMEN VOTERS AT POLL
|
editor@fijileaks.comARCHIVES
September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 |