In the case of deported Fiji Sun publisher and editor-in-chief Russell Hunter, Fiji Sun's own IT expert had hacked into Hunter's company e-mail account and passed e-mail exchanges between the paper's publisher and Victor Lal regarding Mahendra Chaudhry's tax affair to Bainimarama/Khaiyum regime, leading to Hunter's kidnapping from his home, night in military custody and deportation out of Fiji the next day, and slapped with a banning order not to enter Fiji as long as this thuggish and dictatorial regime remains in power Fiji Sun's new editorial management and Hunter's successors change SIDES and reduce journalism and the paper to laughing stock of nation! With Fiji Sun's West Editor Jyoti Pratibha given free reign to attack Victor Lal; also on banned list of persons from entering Fiji after the tax story!
10 Comments
High Court judge Kamal Kumar says he has NO JURISDICTION to hear constitutional redress case; of course for Khaiyum's Judicial Decree orders Kumar not to do so - rubs salt into the wound - Singh has to pay $3,000 legal cost to Khaiyum's Office and Supervisor of Elections Office The Suva High Court has today dismissed the application made by Steven Singh of the Fiji Labour Party who was seeking constitutional redress after he was disqualified from contesting the elections due to a conviction. Judge Justice Kamal Kumar delivered his ruling this afternoon and said that the court does not have the jurisdiction to deal with the declaration sought by Singh and dismissed and struck out the application. Justice Kumar also said that the court’s decision does not determine the eligibility or ineligibility of Singh to be a candidate for the 2014 General Elections as it is not the function of court. He has also ordered Singh to pay $3000 in costs to the Office of the Supervisor of Elections and the Attorney General’s Office. Source: Fijivillage News "THE road to Syria for our unsuspecting Fijian men and women started with a web of deceit and cover up that has finally led to the arrest of 45 Fijian Peacekeepers at the Golan Heights. Our men and women in the Fiji Military Forces should demand for the truth from their Commander, Mosese Tikoitoga and former Commander Voreqe Bainimarama for the sake of the detainees and their families. It has always been known that Australia and other UN member countries were putting pressure on the UN to remove Fiji from all Peacekeeping missions. The UN then gave an ultimatum to Fiji to go to Syria or they are removed from all missions. Bainimarama and Tikoitoga, together with the illegal Attorney General Aiyaz Saiyed Khaiyum, Fiji Diplomat to the United Arab Emirates, Robin Nair and a few other high level delegates plotted a way to work with the UN and at the same time be the eyes and ears of the Syrian Government reporting on the positions of the rebels. Fiji has diplomatic ties with Syria. During Bainimarama's trip to Dubai, he was met by the Syrian diplomat who had offered some financial help to him in exchange for the Fiji Battalion to be in Syria and report on the Syrian Rebels position. The Syrian Rebels are what we now know to be linked to the Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front. This is not surprising as Bashar Hafez al-Assad, the President of Syria (and General Secretary of the Ba'ath Party) and Aiyaz Saiyad Khaiyum, Fiji's Attorney General (and General Secretary of the Fiji First Party) are both Sunni Muslims. The meeting was orchestrated by Khaiyum through the Fiji diplomat Robin Nair. The idea was that the Fiji Battalion had the advantage being a UN force. The request was verbal but the token of appreciation given in cash was only known to Bainimarama and Tikoitoga. The senior officers selected to lead the mission were changed on the eleventh hour as they questioned the legality of the special request from Syria. They saw this as a breach of charter to the UN mission which could be seen as treason. Syria through Russia requested the Fiji Military to offer assistance to the Al Assad government in exchange of funds to purchase equipment required for the mission. In a meeting held in Moscow attended by Bainimarama and the Commander, North Korea volunteered to supply arms but Fiji requested to be given money to purchase similar arms to what they have at Nabua because they are familiar with. Money was given by both countries but no arms or new equipments were purchased and the funds have disappeared. Since the arrival of the Fiji Battalion, the Syrian government was able to target the rebel positions accurately and the only people who had access to accurately reveal these positions were our Fijian peacekeepers. They were warned by the Israeli Intelligence and US to stop but these warnings fell on deaf ears. They were warned that the Rebels had already suspected them to be the Syrian Government informers. Well folks, the web of deceit and cover up have somehow now been uncovered by the Syrian Rebels, the Al-Nusra Front and Fiji is now caught in the wrong side of the field playing on the same side with the wrong players. So let's demand the TRUTH from these two Bainimarama and Tikoitoga as they are now answerable to the Rebels anger to the deal that they were a part of, OR and not forgetting AIYAZ SAIYED KHAIYUM." To Fijileaks Editor:
Comment by Anit Singh: Don't Vote for the Chor Party The FijiFirst party and their various aspiring candidates stand under the banner of a STOLEN name, a STOLEN logo and the STOLEN color of our Fiji Flag. It just shows how unoriginal and unimaginative lot they are. They are no thinkers, philosophers or visionaries – No, they are just CHORS. Bainimarama is a CHOR and so is AIYAZ - a CHOR– they are both (sly and sneaky) CHORS. They STOLE ruthlessly and without shame, our Fiji First Party name. This is a FACT which is beyond any reasonable doubt – AIYAZ and BAINIMARAMA are both CHORS. CHORI is a trait – as the saying goes if they can STEAL an egg they will STEAL the chicken (Murgi Chors). Do not let them STEAL your future – Because that’s what CHORS do – they STEAL. I APPEAL to all my Family and all my Friends – DO NOT vote for these two CHORS! CHORS belong in Naboro but Parliament. FROM THE ARCHIVES: By VICTOR LAL Fiji's Daily Post, 2001 PART FOUR THE RACE TO BECOME PRIME MINISTER A Tale of ‘Greedy Political Hares chasing after the Galloping Hound’ - Chaudhry fights his corner to become Prime Minister - refuses to play second class citizen in Fiji One of the most distressing spectacles in the run up to the appointment of the new Prime Minister of Fiji was the introduction of the race card by the Fijian Association Party (FAP) and some elements from the Party of National Unity (PANU). Here were two parties in coalition with the FLP, and yet when it came to the big prize they began to demand that a Fijian should be appointed the Prime Minister of Fiji. They demanded the top post for a Fijian not on merit and electoral numbers but based on the crude politics of race and fear. What is more surprising, is that it was Adi Kuini’s FAP, which was the most vocal in pushing for a Fijian prime minister on the spurious argument that it represented the Fijian electorate in Parliament. It was a surprising demand on her part because Adi Kuni should have known better than any other Fijian politician, based on her own personal experiences of the 1987 coups, that her own late and former husband, Dr Timoci Bavadra, had been overthrown from power despite being a Fijian, and was married to a paramount Fijian high chief. Adi Kuini hails from the chiefly clan of Navosa and is also a niece of the great Fijian leader Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna. The race for the prime ministership was like a tale of running with the hare and hunting the hound. But Chaudhry, the wily old political fox, had outfoxed the political bears. Labour’s overwhelming victory had put Chaudhry at the political helm. Once the official election results were announced, the Labour Parliamentary caucus elected him as the party’s nominee for prime minister. Soon afterwards, he was appointed Prime Minister by the President Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara. Chaudhry fights corner to be PM The Fijian Coalition partners claimed that they were neither consulted nor informed, and reacted angrily claiming Chaudhry’s appointment a breach of an implicit agreement to have an ethnic Fijian as prime minister. The FAP had decided that they would only join the FLP if party leader Adi Kuini was made Prime Minister. They said they would not join unless their stipulation was met. Viliame Saulekaleka said instead of waiting to discuss the issue with them, they were shocked that the FLP had gone ahead in getting Chaudhry sworn-in. It was believed that PANU was also considering opting out of the coalition. PANU would have wanted their leader Apisai Tora to be PM had he won his seat. But Chaudhry was forthright in his desire to become PM: ‘It is the Labour Party which has the majority in this election and that’s what democracy is all about, and the people have given their mandate, and that mandate must be respected’, he said. Chaudhry was the obvious party choice for the position, although there were other contenders, including Tupeni Baba. Chaudhry also had the tacit support of his political adversary, the defeated NFP leader Jai Ram Reddy, who told the press: ‘One thing is very clear-the people’s mandate must be carried forward. And the people have overwhelmingly voted for the Fiji Labour Party. And the leader of the Fiji Labour Party, I think, is entitled to being the Prime Minister. And I sympathise with that point of view so that’s the correct thing to do. And their support is not marginal, its quite overwhelming. And as he (Chaudhry) put it, I think, the verdict of the people is crystal clear. So I’m hoping that he will be the Prime Minister.’ Chaudhry was sworn-in as the new and first Indo-Fijian Prime Minister of Fiji. The swearing-in ceremony was delayed because officials had to look for the Hindu holy book, the Gita. This small but significant piece of religious item of historical importance, just goes to show that the Government House had never been prepared for such an eventuality, for it was the Bible that had been used since the first elections in post-independence Fiji to swore-in prime ministers of Fijian origin. One noticeable absentee at the swearing-in-ceremony was Adi Kuini Vuikaba Speed. Her non-attendance, for whatever reason, was later to be taken as a snub and a detrimental move for her party by the FLP. Adi Kuini asked President Ratu Mara to revoke the decision and appoint her as head of government because she was the leader of the largest ‘Fijian’ party in the winning coalition. Poseci Bune, the VLV leader, reportedly began canvassing the possibility of heading a broad coalition of Fijian parties in opposition. Tora threatened to pull out of the coalition altogether. The Fijian nationalists proposed to march against the government. Ratu Mara however rejected a request from the FAP to install their leader, Adi Kuini as the new PM. The letter was delivered to Ratu Mara by FAP official and Bau chief, Ratu Viliame Dreunimisimisi. Mara rejected the letter, saying he had already installed Chaudhry as the leader of the Coalition, and asked them to work with the Coalition. Mara did Chaudhry no favour: he did what the Constitution required him to do as President of Fiji: to appoint as prime minister the member of the House of Representatives who in his opinion commanded majority support. In turn, Chaudhry offered Adi Kuini the post of Deputy Prime Minister. He had outmanoeuvred her. She had two choices: to accept the second top post in the government or sit on the Opposition benches with her former opponents from the SVT. Labour also threatened to invite VLV into Cabinet. After hours of deliberations with party colleagues, Adi Kuni accepted the second deputy prime minister position in the new Cabinet. She quoted Mara’s advice: ‘It was basically appealing to us as leaders to consider the importance of co-operation rather than be at loggerheads with the new government.’ But coalition partner, PANU, expressed its disappointment with Chaudhry’s invitation to the VLP. PANU officials said they did not appreciate the fact that Chaudhry asked another party before even approaching them, their coalition partner. PANU however also accepted Chaudhry’s offer to join the government. Its parliamentary leader-Meli Bogileka-said they had accepted Chaudhry’s offer of two Cabinet seats to them: ‘The Prime Minister has offered us two ministeries positions. And I would like to thank Prime Minister for that being so generous because PANU-if you look at our constitution-there are only four elected members of parliament there. We are not entitled as far as the constitution is concerned. We’re supposed to have the number eight as you well know. So he has given us in realisation of PANU coming from the province of Ba-where more than 60 per cent of ALTA is based-the concentration of the population of our brother and sister Indians- who are mainly cane farmers-and that’s where the economy of the country lies-in the western division.’ Tora seems to have belatedly given his blessing. ‘He said your decision is totally yours and he has given us his blessings. He says whatever your decisions are-those are your decisions-and I leave it at that. I don’t like to intervene or interfere and he said so you have my blessings’, Bogileka said. Chaudhry also extended an invitation to the VLP and SVT to join Labour in forming government. ‘I hope they respond soon. Labour has the numbers to form government on its own but I would like them very much to join us so that we can have a government representative of all the people in Fiji. I have a duty to provide a stable government as soon as possible.’ Chaudhry was confident that the two parties would take up the offer: ‘There is not much difference between us except for (Sakeasi) Butadroka.’ On calls by some VLV members for Fiji to be made a Christian state and for a re-imposition of the Sunday ban, Chaudhry said VLP leader Bune had made it clear that there will be no Sunday ban and neither will Fiji be declared a Christian state. Chaudhry also invited the two Independent General MPs (Leo Smith and Bill Aull) and the lone Rotuman MP Marieta Rigamoto to be part of his Coalition. Chaudhry was suddenly under a siege situation as minority parties made impossible demands for places in his new Cabinet. In fact, Chaudhry had to delay naming his Cabinet because of demands made on him, especially from the SVT which was soundly thrashed at the polls. STV leader Rabuka wrote to Chaudhry saying his minority group will join a multi-party Cabinet if it is given four Cabinet portfolios, including the position of the Deputy Prime Minister for himself, the Ministry of Works portfolio for Ratu Inoke Kubuabola, and Ministry of Finance portfolio for Jim Ah Koy. Rabuka also demanded seats in the Senate and in the boards of state-owned enterprises. The results of the general election had given Chaudhry such an overwhelming majority to lead the country in the 21st century. But the Constitution had required of him to make an offer to the SVT. It was possible, some argued, that some of the demands being made, especially from the SVT, were being designed to put Chaudhry in a situation where he was damned if he said ‘yes’, and damned if he said ‘no’. What is surprising is that the SVT caucus, according to Rabuka’s biographer John Sharpham, had agreed shortly after the election results were announced, to remain on the Opposition benches, and not be a part of the multi-party government. Rabuka later claimed that, ‘We had accepted the Prime Minister’s invitation to be part of the multi-party Cabinet on the condition that I become the Deputy Prime Minister. Our collective decision was that because we structured the new Constitution, we should join the multi-party Cabinet of Chaudhry’s government. Our collective decision is that because we were party to the Constitution, we structured the Constitution in our belief that it was good for the country, good for us to have a multi-party Cabinet and to uphold those we decided to be part of the new Government’ The terms put forward to Chaudhry included that Rabuka be also made the Minister for Fijian Affairs. As we have already noted, Chaudhry found these demands unacceptable, specially from a party which was not only soundly thrashed at the polls, emerging with only eight seats, but the fact that it was not even part of the Peoples Coalition in the first instance. ‘I invited them and they wanted to dictate to me their terms which I just can not entertain’. While Chaudhry seemed like he was under a lot of pressure, political observers insisted he was in too strong a position to be bullied. Unfortunately, while Chaudhry refused to be bullied, he however, bent over backwards to appease the Fijian community at large, and in the process drawing the wrath of his own community in the appointment of his Cabinet. He had to appeal to his Indo-Fijian members of his Government to accept his desire to share power with Fiji’s other communities. Fijians dominate Chaudhry Cabinet Chaudhry picked a Fijian dominated Cabinet as he moved to bring the two major races together. He had made a great political sacrifice after 11 Fijians were sworn into the 17-member Cabinet. Many thought the Cabinet was going to be dominated by Indo-Fijians. There was widespread rumours that Ratu Mara had a hand in shaping his Cabinet. ‘I must admit that His Excellency played a very major role in the naming of my Cabinet and he did it in his usual way’, Chaudhry said. Asked why his cabinet weighed heavily in favour of Fijians, Chaudhry said: ‘Why not?’. Chaudhry’s strategic move was seen by political observers as sensitive to the sensitiveness of the Fijians. He was trying to fulfil the multi-racial, multicultural and multi-party spirit of the 1997 Constitution of Fiji. Chaudhry left the post of the crucial Ministry of Home Affairs vacant until further consultation with his FLP partners. He however intimated that the post will go to a FAP MP and not to the VLP as speculated. It was rumoured that the post would go to the defeated VLP candidate and one of its founders, Ratu Epeli Ganilau. While Chaudhry seemed to have won the first round of the battle, Rabuka resigned from his embattled leadership of the SVT, and went on to become the chairman of the Great Council of Chiefs. Chaudhry allocated Adi Kuini the powerful but sensitive Fijian Affairs portfolio which made her chairperson of the Great Council of Chiefs, from where she was expelled by the Rabuka Government because of her leadership of the FAP. From hindsight, it was a strategic mistake, for now Adi Kuini suddenly found herself having to deal with Rabuka as the leader of the powerful body when she and her party expected a senior Fijian chief to fill the revered role. Moreover, Rabuka had wanted her Fijian Affairs post as part of the condition to enter Chaudhry’s government. As he exited from the political scene, Rabuka again blamed the Indo-Fijians for rejecting his party’s philosophy of multi-racialism. There was no call to the indigenous Fijians to shed their own insular and inward looking nationalism, and to reciprocate by accepting the Peoples Coalition’s version of multi-racialism. We have already pointed out elsewhere why the charges against the Indo-Fijians are false. What had caused SVT’s defeat, according to Rabuka, was ‘the personal weaknesses of the candidates, the personal weaknesses of those that were sitting in the last [Rabuka] government, failing to visit their Constituency regularly, the unpopularity of some of the Government policies, the weaknesses in our party machinery and structure’, and of course, ‘my coalition with the National Federation Party (NFP) was one of the causes of the SVT downfall’. It was not THE cause of SVT’s downfall. PART ONE Was Dr Baba betrayed for PM’s job in 1999? Did his Indo-Fijian colleagues put a political knife in his back? By VICTOR LAL The Fiji Sun, March 2006: Dr TUPENI BABA has suddenly popped up in Fiji on the eve of the general election. He has been allocated a seat by the SDL to fight the election, even though he was not listed on the primary list of candidates. And expectedly he has begun to make political noises, especially against his former political boss Mahendra Pal Chaudhry of the Fiji Labour Party. Baba has been explaining and unconvincingly defending his decision to join the SDL. He is however palpably silent on his other creature – the New Labour Unity Party. What is going on? Why is Baba taking a public swipe at Chaudhry. He says that the FLP does not deserve to lead Fiji unless it changes its leader Chaudhry. Baba says that his former boss is a shadow of his former political self. If the SDL hopes that his inclusion will strengthen their winning team, they are mistaken. The reverse is quite possible. The more he speaks out the less he will be listened to. After all, he has been out of politics for the last five years. According to Baba, Chaudhry's judgement was affected by the events of the 2000 coup and as a result, he had been pursuing politics of negativity for the last five years. Is Baba’s own alleged treatment in 1999 clouding his political views. What is the truth? Truth, that much abused word in Fiji. Was Baba denied the Prime Ministership by Chaudhry and his Indo-Fijian collegaues as Baba claimes in his book the Speight of Violence. Is he trying to settle old political scores? I am sure that sooner or later Baba will revert to that fateful day in 1999 when the race for the Prime Ministership began following the Peoples Coalition’s stunning victory. Lets travel down that memory lane, to the year 1999. (Edited out, for details, see above posting) In his published book, Speight of Violence: Inside Fiji’s 2000 coup, co-authored by journalist Michael Fields, Baba claims that he was led to believe that he would be prime minister. He also alleges that Tora’s fury stemmed from the fact that FLP, by fielding strong candidates, especially in Tora’s Nadi Open, had reneged on its promise to put up only token candidates. Tora lost his seat in the election, and FLP’s Parduman Raniga won. According to Baba, ‘This led to acrimonious debates and accusations but Chaudhry was insistent he did not agree to this principle in the first place’. It was also expected that Adi Kuini would be a contender for the post of prime minister. During the election campaign, however, Baba claims that his name was touted around for the job. In Fijian constituencies, ‘People asked about leadership. Again and again I was asked who would be prime minister if we won. I avoided answering but the senior members of the party who were with me told the people that a Fijian would be prime minister and then my name was mentioned’. At a rally at Lautoka, even Chaudhry who had been with Baba as he spoke to the crowd, announced that they had just heard the address of their future prime minister (Baba). Baba claims that as they moved into traditional Fijian areas that their expectation was that he would be leading Labour and its coalition as prime minister. ‘There was nothing I had encountered in the discussions at various levels that was not consistent with this expectation. As we campaigned with the most senior Indo-Fijian Labour leaders like Krishna Datt and Pratap Chand, both members of the Labour Party management board pushed the same message, especially in their constituencies’. Baba denied PM’s job? On Tuesday 18 May 1999, according to Baba, he received a word of a meeting of the management board in the Public Service Room at 4pm. Party president Jokapeci Koroi, Pratap Chand, Krishna Datt, Sachida Sharma, whose son was married to Chaudhry’s daughter, and Baba, attended the meeting. After the opening prayer and pleasantries, they discussed the leadership of the party. Koroi, Baba claims, expressed surprise and asked Chaudhry to explain his change of view as to who was to lead. It was obvious she had heard that he wanted to be prime minister, which at that point Baba claims he had not heard. Chaudhry explained that in terms of the tradition of democracy, the parliamentary leader who led the party into election was normally expected to be the prime minister if the party won. He went on to say that if ‘we did not give him the post of premiership it would be tantamount to giving him a vote of no confidence’. He continued that already people were calling him prime minister. According to Baba, ‘Koroi turned to other members, especially Pratap Chand and Datt. I sat there composed and interested in the viewpoints of my other close colleagues. These were people with whom, and in whose defence, I had faced imprisonment, abuse and persecution from my own Fijian people in 1987-including having a close Fijian relation, Rabuka, pointing a gun at my head because of my belief in a united Fiji through multiracialism, democracy and social justice, the central tenets of the Labour Party’. Up to this day, Baba claims, he cannot recall anything of any significance in their contributions to that discussion. Here were the people in the Indian community ‘I had respected and shared many moments of joy with: I had known their families and relations. Both had publicly stated who should lead if Labour wins. I could not believe they could be too tongue-tied or scared to express their views, unless they felt intimidated by Chaudhry. They had a record in Fiji of being articulate and forceful speakers but they remained quiet. I could not expect anything different from Sachida Sharma; I knew he would ‘echo his master’s voice’ Now that Baba heard their views, he said, ‘I’m ready to lead if you want me’. He explained what they had promised to the people and what the people expected of them. They sat for two hours, Baba claims; later they heard that the members of the Labour Party caucus who had been waiting for the result were beginning to suspect we had disagreed on the leadership. A number of alternatives came to mind. Baba claims that he knew that if they were to vote on the issue, it would be the Fijians (Koroi and him) against the Indo-Fijians, but he thought that for such an important issue, voting was hardly appropriate. Other ideas came to him – his mind was furiously turning as he talked. Continued Baba: ‘Should I resign or should I walk out and express my disgust publicly? But this would break up the party. I recalled the faces of the people in Bua and Dama and the hundreds of villages and settlements I visited during the campaigns telling me with one voice: stay. I could hear their requests for electricity, for better medical facilities, for better schools, for running water, for better transport in the small and remote islands and for Fijians, Indians, Islanders and other races.’ Baba had made his point. Now the party members of the management board had to accept the responsibility of their decision. They offered Baba the post of deputy prime minister and Krishna Datt, Baba claims, suggested switching the post of prime minister in one year; it was all to ‘appease their own conscience; they were searching for something they could say to the Fijian people’. Baba remained detached from the rest of the discussion, as he ‘had lost respect for some of my close associates-in my estimate, they had already destroyed their own credibility’. He wondered ‘how they could serve the party henceforth’. As the management board meeting was about to end Baba was asked to move a motion in the Labour caucus that Chaudhry be made prime minister, to be seconded by one of his colleagues. What a suggestion, Baba thought – ‘it showed an ignorance of Fijian protocol’. According to Baba, ‘Koroi, an indigenous Fijian and president of the party looked at me and I could read her mind. She too was in turmoil. She would have to deal with her own struggle. Despite my long years as a professional educator and academic, I was a Fijian grounded in Fijian deep sense of veirokorokovi or respectfulness based on our honest dealings with each other. This had been breached-and no wonder; there had been no genuine cooperation between the two major racial groups in politics, certainly not in practice in the Labour Party at that point’. Baba went on to conclude, “As I moved the motion, I knew from the faces of the seven Fijians out of the 37 elected members present that we had a hard job ahead of us. Joeli Kalou, the most senior of them, looked me in the eye and he did not have to express it. Given the disposition of Chaudhry, both Kalou and I knew that the job would be next to impossible. The pleasantries that followed that caucus meeting soon faded into insignificance for many of my Fijian colleagues. As the news broke out, our phone lines became clogged and we started to explain (and even justify) how the spirit of the Fiji Labour Party had died. Chaudhry was not to be denied, though, and insisted on taking the leadership. The Government was sworn in on 19 May 1999. He proudly said of it: ‘I have to put the constitution to test’.” Baba’s wife, Unaisi Nabobo-Baba has added her recollections to the controversial episode: ‘On the campaign trail typical Labour promises were made…Among the promises was one that Tupeni would be prime minister. Tupeni could not have been prime minister, however, for a number of reasons. Firstly, in the morning after the victory announcement, before the world was awake, I received a telephone call from Chaudhry’s house asking Tupeni to attend the swearing-in of Mahendra Chaudhry as PM. Tupeni was requested to bring along the other two attendants requested by Mahen: Jokapeci Koroi and Joeli Kalou. Kalou declined, giving reasons that this was not the promise made to the people during the campaign. Koroi as party president and Tupeni attended, not before Tupeni got an earful from me about the fact that the other two Fijian parties in the new coalition had not been summoned for a joint meeting over the choice of premiership. By eight o’clock that morning, Tupeni and Koroi entered the Government House for the swearing-in. It was not to be, however. Tupeni returned saying the president was not ready and could they kindly return at 11 o’clock when his office staff were ready for duty.’ Unaisi Baba prayed, hoping that Baba’s returning home was not a bad omen, a sign that life needed to be closely guarded. But again, she notes, ‘it could have been that I was just smelling a rat; one never is sure in politics about the political goings-on, hey confuse more than anything, and some politicians clearly have more mastery over such an art than others. She went on to claim: ‘Chaudhry decided that the official residence where Rabuka had lived for five years was too small and constricted compared to his own house. He suggested that the official residence be given to the vice-president, Ratu Jofesa Iloilo. This was reported in the press and drew criticism not only from Rabuka but also from other Fijians. It implied that he was passing the house to the vice-president, a high chief, because it was not good for him.’ In the same book, Baba went on to point out other alleged shortcomings of Chaudhry, including the way ‘Chaudhry went around standard public service procedure and hired his son Rajendra as personal secretary. It looked like nepotism’. Responding to Baba’s book, the FLP said it was not surprised that a frustrated Baba should discredit its leader Chaudhry. According to the FLP, ‘Baba is a frustrated, embittered person who had always harboured ambitions of taking over leadership of the Labour Party but never had grassroots support to make a successful bid. He ran away from Fiji after the humiliation of his 2001 defeat. FLP categorically rejects the claims that Chaudhry had seized the leadership of the FLP to become prime minister in 1999 despite giving assurances that Baba would get the post of prime minister, should Labour win the elections. The question of seizing leadership does not arise as Chaudhry had been the official and recognised leader of the Fiji Labour Party. Chaudhry has always held the opinion, backed by political convention, that the person who successfully leads the party into elections, takes over as prime minister regardless of his ethnicity’. Chaudhry added: ‘I have never subscribed to the view that only an indigenous Fijian is eligible to be prime minister of Fiji. Why would I then give such an assurance to Baba?’ When Baba challenged Chaudhry for the FLP’s leadership in 2000, I wrote an article calling Baba ‘The Great Pretender’ and went on to urge him to allow his vision of multi-racialism to triumph over the politics of race. We had just emerged from the political terrorism of George Speight’s coup. But now, as we prepare for the next election, it is important for Datt, Chand, and Koroi to explain their version of events. For only lately, Chaudhry called upon Datt, one of the founding fathers of the FLP, to stay on to guide the party in the next elections. Was Dr Tupeni Baba betrayed in 1999? Or has he told a spate of untruths about the race to prime ministership. The onus is on the FLP to tell us their version of truth. In Fiji, history has a habit of repeating himself. TOMORROW: In 1977, Siddiq Koya was betrayed, says Chaudhry Fiji Sun headline might be unpalatable but it will go down well with voters LEADER IS NOT AFRAID OF ANYONE: SODLEPA “She is not now nor ever will be afraid of anyone or anything. She was not afraid when she was arrested in the middle of the night by jack-booted men in dark camouflage, detained in a police cell for several days and then taken to the army barracks to be detained yet again. When most were afraid of Frank, she has written and co-signed several public letters to Frank, protesting the abrogation of the Great Council of Chiefs, the proposed Namosi mine waste water spillage a[n]d marched with her people down Victoria Parade to present her formal document of protest against the 2013 Constitution” - Ro Kepa's spokesman Jese Sikivou Fijileaks Editor to Sodelpa: If so, GO ON regime propaganda FBC Television station and tell it all to nation; after all, FijiVillage is another regime news stooge Social Democratic Liberal Party leader Ro Teimumu Kepa is not afraid of anyone and her decision to pull out from an upcoming television show where she was to face FijiFirst leader and Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama was due to scheduling conflicts, says her private secretary and SODELPA's director of communications, Jese Sikivou. Sikivou said he manages her schedule, both political and personal and as a practical decision he had emailed the host of the show to decline the invitation to appear on FBC a second time . “It should be noted and noted well that only a scant three weeks ago, the Gone Marama Bale appeared live and Frank Bainimarama, failed to show nor did he send in his apologies." “Today we learn much too late from the Fiji Sun of Frank’s scheduling conflicts. Surely the Gone Marama Bale should be extended the same courtesy and we on the other hand have taken the professional courtesy of sending Edwin Nand our apologies,” Sikivou said. Sikivou said in reply to a local media headline ‘What is she afraid of?’ that Ro Teimumu fears no one but the Almighty. “She is not now nor ever will be afraid of anyone or anything. She was not afraid when she was arrested in the middle of the night by jack-booted men in dark camouflage, detained in a police cell for several days and then taken to the army barracks to be detained yet again. “When most were afraid of Frank, she has written and co-signed several public letters to Frank, protesting the abrogation of the Great Council of Chiefs, the proposed Namosi mine waste water spillage ad marched with her people down Victoria Parade to present her formal document of protest against the 2013 Constitution,” he said. Sikivou added “while the Gone Marama Bale proudly maintain the finest traditions of Nadroga warrior braves riding like the Lone Ranger, Frank always travels in an armada of heavily tinted 4 wheel drive vehicles surrounded by armed security guards. He is heavily guarded around the clock. Just by that casual observation, WHO IS AFRAID? “ Sikivou said he asked the host for a show format and after getting the answers, he made a conscious decision to decline the second invitation. “This decision was carefully considered because we are still scheduled, as far as I know, to appear with Frank on various stations of Communications Fiji Limited. Sikivou said this coming Sunday should see Ro Teimumu and Prime Minister Bainimarama in a talk back show on another radio station. “I hope this will allay all concerns and answer Jyoti Pratibha’s ridiculously capricious question. In turn I have a question for her and her rag, the Fiji Sun. Is this your pathetic and futile attempt to detract from Frank’s free fall poll numbers?” Sikivou said. Source: Fijilive FROM Fijileaks Archive:
'My son's been slaughtered': Mother's agony as she learns on Twitter of her Lebanese soldier son's beheading by ISIS barbarians after he tried to escape captivity WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT: Zeinab Noun's 20-year-old son, Abbas Medlej, was among 19 Lebanese soldiers captured by the extremist militants earlier this month when a troop of fighters stormed a border town. The Shiite Muslim reportedly tried to escape his Sunni captors by pretending to go to the bathroom. Today his mother wept for her 'sacrificed' son and warned: 'We must take our revenge from those apostates.' His beheading comes after Sgt Ali al-Sayyed was murdered in a similarly brutal vein. This image, believed to depict Medlej's beheading, was shared on Twitter. The young man's mother reiterated his vow, warning: 'We have to take our revenge from those apostates'. Fijileaks Editor: "We must take our revenge against Bainimarama's warlord Khaiyum at the poll" Khaiyum & his Rottweiler hound dog are holding media and citizens HOSTAGE by denying them freedom of speech, expression & DEBATE
"The 2014 elections will go down as the most difficult general elections in our history. Our media remains under the tightest of Government control. Many voters are unable to speak freely because they fear being punished by the government. Our TV, radio and print media have shown an unprecedented level of bias. Our NGO’s have been barred from promoting public debate. Our supporters have been threatened." "A fresh breeze of change and hope is blowing all around us. Be bold – exercise your vote wisely, ask your relatives and friends to turn up to vote. Join us in our journey to make this country great. Join the NFP in our journey to make Fiji once again a symbol of hope to our region and to the world." National Federation Party: The choice of the 2014 general election
Speech delivered at NFP Rally, Labasa Civic Centre 10.30AM; Saturday September 5, 2014 By NFP Leader Professor Biman Prasad Ladies and Gentlemen Our meeting is shadowed by great pain today. Before I begin my address allow me to share our prayers for our brave men in uniform as they face this period of great uncertainty in the Mid East. Our prayers and solidarity are with the families of those in captivity. We join our Commander and The Secretary General of the United Nations Mr Ban Ki Moon in calling for the immediate release of all Fijian troops. The thoughts of the whole nation are with our men. Ladies and gentleman As we come towards the end of the most bitter and difficult campaign in our history, allow me to speak on the choices that lie before us. Madam President and I have taken our campaign to all corners of Fiji. I have visited all our towns, 100s of villages, and met so many of you at your homes and in communities. Thank you for welcoming us so wholeheartedly. For the first time in our country’s political history; tens of thousands of you have linked to us from across our country and the world through Facebook, twitter and the web. I thank so many of you who have joined up with our cause through new technology platforms. This is a significant new development that offers hope for our democracy but also hope for how we achieve greatness as a country. The 2014 elections will go down as the most difficult general elections in our history. Our media remains under the tightest of Government control. Many voters are unable to speak freely because they fear being punished by the government. Our TV, radio and print media have shown an unprecedented level of bias. Our NGO’s have been barred from promoting public debate. Our supporters have been threatened. To the International observer group - I have said from the day I took over the leadership role – the mainstream media is fully under the control of the Government. The electoral regulations and procedures are so fully stacked against us. It is for you to make your own assessment of how free the 2014 general elections are going to be. This general election reminds us as a country that the most pressing need is to restore our democracy. Our civil servants are kept under close scrutiny. Whole communities are deprived of government programs when their elders question the Government. Scholarships are terminated if you raise voices against the government. Businesses are victimized if they challenge unfair government policies. Journalists are expelled. Critics of government are barred from visiting their homeland. We are an undemocratic country. To voters, I say these elections are historic. In these 2014 general elections – the most basic choice is whether to restore democratic government or maintain an authoritarian government. This is the stark choice before the country. And so this election is historic. I ask of voters to be on the right side of history. Our children and grandchildren will judge us harshly if we waste this historic opportunity to vote for a government that promotes democracy and protects the human rights of all citizens. Our message cannot be clearer. Without a genuine democracy, we cannot build our country. Investors will not invest and create good jobs; individuals will not take risks and open new businesses. We will not be able to increase your incomes; we will not be able to increase your retirement incomes. We will not be able to further reduce VAT. This is why democracy matters to you and your families. If we are democratic once again, we will be able to restore economic growth. I have said before; that given the scale of challenges facing our country, we need at a minimum a decade of more than 5 percent of economic growth. This is more than 3 times the average rate of economic growth of the Bainimarama years. We will not let the dreams of another generation of young be wasted by such an incompetent government as the one in power today. Our young have quietly but forcefully spoken – they want a change of Government. I am asking our country and especially our older voters, please listen to the young, vote for their future, and give the NFP a chance. We need to restore growth to more than 5 percent per annum. We need to sustain that level of growth. We need to do that not because economists say this is a good thing. We need to do that because; we want to create 4000 new jobs per year for our children leaving schools and universities. We want these 4000 new jobs for our children to pay no less than $8,000 per year. This Government cannot and will not do that. We need to restore the financial health of the FNPF. We want to restore the pension’s level to at least 15 percent and higher still as financial health improves. This government cannot and will not do that. We need to reduce the national debt built up by this wasteful government. When we reduce our debts, markets will trust us more. This government cannot and will not restore the trust of international investors. We have said that we will reduce VAT levels to 10 percent. This Government is scared of even considering that as an option. Let me go further. When we secure a 5 percent growth path, I intend to bring corporate tax levels down by 5 percent. I intend to increase tax threshold to $20,000 within 2 years of hitting the 5 percent growth target. We have done our maths. We will do what we will say. We will not shift the goalposts. Ladies and gentlemen You have asked what is the difference between the NFP and other parties. The NFP has fought for democracy and equality for all 51 years of its existence – not some of it. This Government has systematically curtailed some of the most basic of freedoms of individuals, communities and NGOS’s. Let us close that debate right here. The difference is so obvious. I have listened to the nation’s concerns about a national name. A national name cannot be imposed. Throughout our meetings across the country, I have heard anxieties about the national name. I have sought the views of our elders and of linguists. They have spoken on the subject. We know we cannot do much as the constitution has been imposed on us. But the nation will have a free conversation about the national name after the elections and through that decide on the national name. This is too serious an issue to be left to the whims and fancies of two people in government to decide on. Throughout our meetings across the breath of the country, I have heard the cry of citizens when they go to seek care in our hospitals and health centers. The Government keeps presenting one ‘spin after another’ about how health services are improving, presenting new international partnerships with healthcare providers. But the fact is that basic medicines are in short supply at most centers, even supplies such as bed sheets and towels are missing. Many hospitals are plainly dirty. The wait for doctors and for medical procedures is long. Ambulance services non-existent even in urban areas. In short our health system is in a near state of collapse. We need a national health insurance plan. We need health services to be managed by people who know about modern health systems – not people who are constantly scheming to profit from one government contract or another. This government cannot do anything to fix our healthcare problems. It is bereft of ideas. It has had its time. Much is made of tuition free education by this government. Yes Mr Bainimarama we thank you for that. But we also tell you that the world has moved on. Our education system under your leadership has fallen way behind in the new global world. Our schools including government schools are in pathetic state of disrepair. I have visited dozens of such schools over the last few months. In many schools, libraries are non-existent. Only a small number of our classrooms have any real Internet connections. E-learning is non-existent. No new textbooks have been developed in the last several years. The Bainimarama Government has presided over this period of decay of our education system. This is nothing short of a crime against our children. No spin and no drama can take the responsibility for this away from you Mr Bainimarama and your Government. We will modernize our education system. We will make preschool to university education world class within a decade Ladies and gentlemen, The country wants to know the true cost of the Bainimarama Government. We want to know the long-term costs of the 7 years of this government. Fijians have not had the opportunity to examine the costs of government for so many years. The AG’s attempt to explain the audit reports is plain voodoo. There are many questions that Fiji’s voters want answers for. They want to know if roads financed through the Chinese government loans are costing 30 percent more than the average cost of road construction in Fiji. Did we pay $30 million more for the Vanua Levu roads than we should have? We want to know what are the annual maintenance costs of roads that are not made to high standards. Is it true that we will need $15 million more per year to maintain new roads that are only 2-3 years old? Has the Government wasted $50 million on roads in this way? The country wants answers. Fijians want to know the true costs of external borrowing. Fijians want to know whether they are getting value for money from these large investments. We need a government that can restore order in the management of our nation’s wealth and that can manage its debts. Fiji needs a break from the past. This Government has so divided our country. The other major party also sows seeds of ethnic unease. Fiji cannot move forward this way. We have seen the impact of poor leadership and of poor policy choices. Fiji was within our lifetime the richest country in the South Pacific. Now it is an average South Pacific country. How much lower will we fall if we continue business as usual? Ladies and Gentlemen: This Government has indulged in the biggest vote-buying campaign in our history. This is an indisputable fact. This week we saw a new dawn of vote buying when rubbish bins were distributed in Nasinu. The Electoral Decree 2014 is being breached by this Government through the use of State funds for campaign in the form of advertisements by Ministries like the PM’s Office and Ministry of Health on common name and equal citizenry and health updates respectively. We see Fiji Pine Ltd, a statutory organisation publishing advertisements in the newspaper on distribution of money to landowners. That is why we have been calling on this Government to go into caretaker mode immediately after the Writ for Election was issued by the President. We have also been told by our supporters of the dirty campaign tactics used by Fiji First and Fiji Labour Party. The Fiji First claims we are in coalition with SODELPA while FLP is spreading lies about the NFP entering into an agreement with Fiji First. This demonstrates the desperation on the part of both parties. We have repeatedly stated since 7th December 2013 that we are fighting the elections on our own and intend to solely form a majority government. Misleading the voters in an attempt to win votes is a hallmark of politicians and political parties clutching at straws. Fear mongering in an attempt to scare voters is also prevalent. Team NFP has consistently practiced an issues-based campaign because the people of Fiji want answers to the social, economic and political ills plaguing our nation. Furthermore, making pie-in-the-sky promises like providing free water and increasing subsidy on electricity will not work like what Fiji First has proposed. Their proposal if implemented will mean a meager saving of $1.59 on electricity bills per month and $1.16 on water charges for a month. This pales into significance with our promise to reduce Value Added Tax from 15% to 10% and review import duties on imported food items. Ladies and Gentlemen: The NFP is offering a hugely talented team of individuals. It is a team you can trust. You can trust it because firstly members of Team NFP are not opportunists – We did not support Rabuka’s coups; We did not join Speight and his supporters; We did not support the 2006 coup. Team NFP has been consistently fighting for your rights and freedoms. More than this members of Team NFP are self-made men and women. They are successful teachers, civil servants, unionists, community workers, sportsman, farmers and yes a few successful academics as well. My team will bring into Government this culture of humility, honesty, hard work and perseverance. These are values that the Holy Bible, the Holy Bhagavat Gita, the Holy Ramayana and the Holy Koran teach us. These are values our elders teach us. We will bring these values into conduct of Government. Ladies and gentlemen We cannot pretend that we are country at peace with itself. We are a divided country. Our government for the last few years has deepened divisions in our country. Our communities do not trust each other. A nation so ill at ease with itself cannot achieve greatness. We have listened to you – citizens from all communities. Our programs for government reflect what you want your government to deliver on. We do not have the arrogance to preach to you what is good for you and your families. You have asked us that you want an inclusive government. We offer you an inclusive team; women and men, young and old, mainlanders and islanders. You have asked that you want your leaders to be humble. We respect that. Ladies and gentlemen… A fresh breeze of change and hope is blowing all around us. Be bold – exercise your vote wisely, ask your relatives and friends to turn up to vote. Join us in our journey to make this country great. Join the NFP in our journey to make Fiji once again a symbol of hope to our region and to the world. God Bless Fiji |
editor@fijileaks.comARCHIVES
September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 |