Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

USPGATE: FRANK Bainimarama and Sitiveni Qiliho charged following  complaint laid with Police by USP in July 2019 regarding activities of former staff members. We repeat. It all started with Rabuka's 1987 Coups

9/3/2023

 
Picture

*Hiding behind IMMUNITY that Rabuka extracted at the point of the gun, we saw Indo-Fijian academics at USP abducted and beaten up; one even whacked for hours in a military cell for writing a negative review of the Coupist's book, No Other Way, in which he had justified his two racially motivated coups.
*He appointed a military lackey ISIKELI MATAITOGA  as his DPP who later travelled to London to extradite the gun runner Mohammed Rafiq Kahan and other members of the Movement for Democracy in Fiji. *Mataitoga failed in his bid to extradite the put pro-democracy activists. 
*Later, the same thug resurfaced as Coupist Bainimarama's ambassador to Japan and other countries, and lately we saw him back in Rabuka's Fiji, talking about settling up a Foreign Service Institute.
*One of the most high profile to surface from the USP in 1987 was the late Professor Asesela Ravuvu, who was appointed by Rabuka to chair the racist and autocratic 1990 Constitution of Fiji.
*Our Founding Editor-in-Chief and Ravuvu bitterly clashed at a highly charged conference organised by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London. Bascially, Ravuvu, parroting Rabuka, was claiming that Fiji was only for 'iTaukei Fijians'. All others were second class citizens.
*It was under the racist 1990 Constitution that Rabuka was elected, twice, as Prime Minister of Fiji. Now, he is back as Prime Minister, replacing another coupist Frank Bainimarama. 
*We should not be surprised with Bainimarama being charged, along with former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho.
*Rabuka started the militarisation of the Police Force force when he appointed Savua as Police Commissioner.
*Since 1987, Fiji has been run by Coupists, Convicts and Criminals.
*Just look at Suva lawyer Richard Naidu;  he and the NFP leader and former USP professor BIMAN PRASAD think there is nothing wrong in Naidu to be appointed to chair the Financial Review team, when his sentencing is still pending before the Fiji High Court.
"Oh, all charges and convictions of opponents were purely politically motivated, and at the behest of the Bai-Kai Dictatorship'.
CRY THE BELOVED COUNTRY.
​Welcome to the Coupcoup Land of Fiji
Bainimarama and Rabuka must be investigated over the Military's Regimental Funds - thousands of dollars missing

Picture
Picture
Former Prime Minister, Voreqe Bainimarama and suspended Police Commissioner, Sitiveni Qiliho have officially been charged with abuse of office and will be kept in custody tonight.

Chief of Intelligence and Investigations, Acting ACP Sakeo Raikaci says they will appear in the Suva Magistrates Court at 8am tomorrow.

Acting ACP Raikaci says given the seriousness of the charge, they could not grant bail to the two as it is not a bailable offence.

Additional security will be provided for the special court sitting tomorrow.

The charges have been sanctioned against Bainimarama and Qiliho.
​
The maximum penalty for abuse of office is 10 years imprisonment.

The Crimes Act states that if the act is done or directed to be done for gain, then the maximum penalty is 17 years imprisonment.

Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde had sanctioned the charges of abuse of office following a review of the police evidence docket.

Pryde says the charges relate to a complaint laid with the police by the University of the South Pacific in July 2019 in relation to the activities of former staff members of the university.
​
The DPP says Bainimarama and Qiliho are alleged to have arbitrarily and in abuse of the authority of their respective offices, terminated an active police investigation. The police have also been requested to undertake further investigations into other matters arising from this case and more charges may be laid against other suspects in due course.

From the Archives, By Russell Hunter and Victor Lal, February 2012,
​The New Zealand Herald

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
By RUSSELL HUNTER and VICTOR LAL

​Fiji's chief of police made a private call to his New Zealand counterpart urging him to arrest Commodore Frank Bainimarama a few weeks before the military leader seized power in a coup in December 2006.


It was reported at the time that a request had been made through Interpol and rejected by the New Zealand Government but only now can details from behind the scenes be [re]vealed.

In November 2006 then Police Commissioner Howard Broad took the call from his Fiji counterpart Andrew Hughes, an Australian, who wanted to know if Commodore Bainimarama had committed any offence under New Zealand law for which he could be arrested.

Teams of police officers from both forces worked over a weekend and agreed the future dictator could be charged in New Zealand with perverting the course of justice in a foreign jurisdiction.

The planned charge related to remarks made by Commodore Bainimarama in New Zealand regarding an investigation into his alleged sedition in Fiji.

Mr Hughes sent two senior officers - an assistant commissioner and a senior detective - to New Zealand to liaise in the planned arrest.

"Then Howard Broad had a change of heart," said Mr Hughes. "He said New Zealand Foreign Affairs preferred a political solution.

"I argued it was his decision as Police Commissioner as to who should be charged in New Zealand."

At the time Commodore Bainimarama was in New Zealand for his granddaughter's christening and the Foreign Minister at the time, Winston Peters, had taken the opportunity to broker talks between him and elected Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase aimed at diverting Fiji's lurch towards a military takeover.

A day later, Mr Hughes received a call from Mr Broad.

"He sought my assurance that no NZ citizen would be endangered in Fiji as result of an arrest," said Mr Hughes.

"Of course I would do all in my power to protect all the people in Fiji but a blanket assurance of that kind was not possible. It would be like me asking him for a similar assurance covering all Fiji people in New Zealand. It wasn't possible to give him that.

"In the end, Mr Broad told me, 'Well, we're not going to arrest him."'

Mr Broad, now retired, told the Weekend Herald yesterday in a written statement that he remembered the call well.

"I remember it as a highly unusual request to consider an allegation against the Chief of Defence Force of a neighbouring country's properly constituted Government.

"I remember giving this decision a lot of consideration because it contained complex operational, legal and policy issues. I made the decision but I took a lot of advice. I remain comfortable with it."

He said some aspects of Mr Hughes' explanation did not accord with his recollection but he did not specify what they were.

In Suva, the Fiji police force had been awaiting an opportunity to arrest the commodore on the sedition charge but were unable to penetrate his heavily armed personal security detail - rarely less than 12-strong at any given time.

"I had earlier taken a brief of evidence to the DPP," said Mr Hughes, "and it was agreed that there was a case to answer on a sedition charge.

"We wanted to arrest and charge Commodore Bainimarama but he was permanently covered by heavy security. I was very keen to avoid an armed confrontation between the police and the military. So we waited."

As Prime Minister Qarase waited at Suva's Nausori airport to board a New Zealand Air Force VIP jet to take him to the Peters-brokered talks in Wellington, he was surprised to be joined by Mr Hughes, who then explained that the arrest plan was unlikely to come to fruition. Mr Qarase was shocked.

The Fiji Police Commissioner boarded the flight and in Wellington he met a deputy secretary for foreign affairs but was again told the New Zealand Government's position was that a political or diplomatic solution was preferred.

Aware that the police were ready to arrest him in Suva, Commodore Bainimarama had made it one of his many conditions for any settlement that the police commissioner would have to go.

Mr Hughes had, a week previously, sent his wife and sons to Australia having received credible information that they could be targeted by a military snatch squad.

In Wellington, he sought consular advice which was that he should not return to Fiji. He never did.

Mr Hughes also considered the safety of his own loyal officers who would try to protect him from military arrest.

The 2006 coup was the commodore's fourth attempt.

In 2000 during the negotiations that ended the Speight hostage crisis he suggested that the military should run the country for up to 50 years but Speight - and the president - would have none of it. In 2004 and again in 2005 he planned to take over the Government but his senior officers refused to commit treason.

All were sacked.

By December 2006 it was now or never for Commodore Bainimarama. It was widely agreed amongst informed observers of the events of 2006 in Fiji, including the diplomatic community, that without Commodore Bainimarama the RFMF would be rudderless.

Had Commodore Bainimarama been arrested in New Zealand the Fiji military would have been unable and unwilling to proceed with the removal of the Qarase Government.

The then US ambassador to Fiji, Larry Dinger, summed it up when he told his masters in Washington in a cable leaked by WikiLeaks regarding the New Zealand arrest plan.

"Being passive with bullies only encourages them. An arrest abroad might be the only way to enforce a criminal charge and remove the Bainimarama thorn," he reported.

Labour's foreign affairs spokesman Phil Goff, who did not deal with the issue, could not confirm Mr Hughes' account.

However, he could understand why no arrest was made, saying such a course of action would mean a country lost its credibility as a mediator for dealing with crises.

"I scarcely think you were going to lure a person here under false pretences only to arrest him. That would be seen as an ambush and bad faith and it wouldn't have resolved the situation within Fiji. "
Picture
Picture
A series of documents smuggled out of Fiji tell a vastly different story. Bainimarama not only wanted the job but had tried three times previously to seize control of the nation.

His first attempt occurred during the negotiations to end the George Speight hostage crisis in August 2000. Several of those present confirmed that the Commodore - who had tacitly supported the Speight coup - declared that the military should lead the nation "for the next five, 10 or 50 years".
​
A heated argument between Speight and Bainimarama ensued, ending only when President Ratu Josefa Iloilo said a democratic solution was the only way forward.

Bainimarama proposed that banker and businessman Laisenia Qarase should lead an interim government with elections after one year. But to his frustration he found his "advice" to the interim government was routinely shunned.

By December 2003 the Qarase government - tired of the Commodore's constant and often public interference - was reluctant to renew his term, due to expire in April the following year.
​
When Bainimarama got wind of this, he flew into a rage and ordered his senior officers to start planning a coup. But he reckoned without senior officers who counselled against such action and finally refused to implement his orders.

​On January 5, 2004, secret advice to Bainimarama not to stage a coup warned of the chaos and damage that could follow.

The document, composed and signed by Lieutenant Colonel Jeremaia Waqanisau, Colonel Alfred Tuatoko, Colonel George Kadavulevu, Colonel Samuela Raduva and naval commander Timoci Koroi, reads in part:

​"We feel that the interests of the RFMF (Republic of Fiji Military Forces) and the nation have been overridden by your personal wishes ...

"Under the circumstances there is no way you can justify your intent and impending action. On the other hand the consequences of such action would be catastrophic for Fiji. The despair and suffering will be unbearable and longer lasting than that experienced after 1987 and 2000."

None of the officers agreed to be interviewed.

However, the later "redress of wrong petition" also contains a statement by Tuatoko, who wrote: "In my interview with [Bainimarama] he stated that he would forcefully remove the present government if his term as Comd RFMF was not renewed.

"I advised him that such an act was illegal and amounted to treason. I advised him that there are legal ways to settle his disagreement with government and that he must follow that legal path. Comd said that doing so would take too much time. He said that removing the government would be legally wrong but was morally correct."

This document was sent to the Minister for Home Affairs, Joketani Cokanasiga, and is likely to have been seen by Qarase. Incredibly, nothing was done. A senior minister told Hunter at the time: "We're not too worried about him [Bainimarama]. He doesn't have the support at the camp that he thinks he has."

The aborted coup of January 2004 persuaded the Government that the soldiers would not obey their commander if he ordered them to commit treason by removing it.

In December 2005, Bainimarama decided to try for a third time. He had been reappointed, so his job was no longer an issue, but he knew Police Commissioner Andrew Hughes had no intention of backing off a murder inquiry into the deaths of five members of the elite Counter Revolutionary Warfare unit, kicked to death by loyalist soldiers after the November 2000 mutiny.

There was also anger in sections of the officer corps (by now mostly hand-picked Bainimarama men) that the Qarase Government was "soft" on those involved in the 2000 coup.

Bainimarama had sacked the five officers who refused to carry out his first attempted coup and appointed Lieutenant Colonel Jone Baledrokadroka as Land Force Commander - effectively his deputy. He told Baledrokadroka to prepare plans for a military takeover.

Like his brother officers before him, JB (as he was known) refused to be involved in treason. He was told to take leave and not come back but again the coup had to be postponed.

JB told Hunter on the day of his dismissal: "I saw an order that I deciphered as treasonous and I could not accept it."

By May 2006, in the full realisation that Bainimarama's reappointment had not bought off its troublesome military commander and with a fresh election victory under its belt, the Cabinet wanted him gone.

There was talk of surcharging him for the blatant abuse of military funding in the army's "Truth and Justice" campaign that sought to influence voters during the 2006 election. It came to nothing - but Bainimarama was to hear of it and it fanned the flames of his fury.

With the dismissal of JB he was able to surround himself with an officer corps that owed their positions to him alone. His coup would take place within a year.

Claim strongman threatened to kill officer

Fiji leader Frank Bainimarama threatened to kill a former top army officer who challenged his 2003 coup plan, according to the officer's written testimony.

The late Lieutenant-Colonel Jeremaia Waqanisau refused to carry out the Commodore's coup order and took a new job as CEO at the Ministry of Home Affairs.

In a file note at the time he recalled in January 2004 the Commodore barged into Home Affairs Minister Joketani Cokanasiga's office with several bodyguards, accusing Waqanisau of raising an army against him.

"Bainimarama further said had it not been for the minister I would have been dead already, and next time the military came back to finish what they started he would personally lead [them] to town and make sure I would be the first to die.
​
"I told Bainimarama when he came down next time he should come alone, without his weapon and his armed body guards and then try to kill me. He became furious challenging me to a fight taking off his [weapon] and posing for a fight... I said I didn't want to fight him and he should go away. The minister was holding him back and eventually pushed him out the door."
Picture

Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama says Victor Lal and Russell Hunter have personal vendettas against him.

By GRAHAM DAVIS

(Fiji-born Graham Davis is now an award-winning print and broadcast journalist in Australia. He has covered major events around the world.
He blogs at grubsheet.com)

Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama has strongly denied claims made by two former Fiji journalists that he tried to mount three coups before his takeover in December 2006.


In two articles in the New Zealand Herald, the Oxford-based academic and author Victor Lal and Russell Hunter, the expelled former publisher and editor-in-chief of the Fiji Sun, said Commodore Bainimarama had tried to take over the country after the Speight coup in 2000, and then again in 2004 and 2005.

The latest article details what the authors say is leaked correspondence from some of Commodore Bainimarama’s fellow officers urging him not to proceed and warning that they would oppose him.

In an interview in Suva, Commodore Bainimarama said the allegations were “not true”.

In the case of 2000, Mr Lal and Mr Hunter reported that Commodore Bainimarama demanded the military should be given the authority to rule Fiji for 50 years but this was opposed by the then president, Ratu Josefa Iloilo.

ALREADY IN CONTROL

Denying the account, Commodore Bainimarama said he was already in control of Fiji in 2000. “For their information, I was in charge of the nation in 2000, so I took over in 2000. I gave the government to (Laisenia) Qarase”.

The Prime Minister said it was historical fact that he had handed the reins of power to Laisenia Qarase hoping that he would govern for all Fijians and not just the indigenous majority.

“Everyone knows the story of 2000 when I came in, so why they changed this and (have) people believing it, I don’t know”.

Commodore Bainimarama also denied subsequent attempts to seize government before his takeover in 2006.
He said: In 2004 and 2005, there was no intention then to remove the government because I was trying to tell the government to play ball.

“There was a build-up of animosity between us and the government of the day, but there was no intention then to remove them because I was trying to get them to change their stance on the Qoliqoli (coastal resources) Bill and the racism that was rife. I was trying to persuade Qarase that he was wrong but there was no talk of us wanting to do coups then.”

The Prime Minister also responded to the account by Mr Lal and Mr Hunter that the former Australian police chief in Fiji, Andrew Hughes, tried to persuade NZ police to arrest him during a visit there in the lead-up to the 2006 coup.

According to their report, Mr Hughes believed that comments made by Commodore Bainimarama during the visit constituted grounds for a NZ charge of perverting the course justice.

These comments related to an ongoing police investigation in Fiji into whether Commodore Bainimarama could be charged with sedition for threatening to overthrow the government of Laisenia Qarase.  In the event, the New Zealanders refused to act, primarily because of fears for the safety of NZ citizens in Fiji if the arrest provoked a backlash in the military.

IGNORED THE HUGHES PLAN

The Fijian leader said he’d been aware at the time of the Hughes plan to have him arrested but had ignored it
.
“I didn’t think much of it because I think this guy is a twit. I mean, who would think of getting away with the arrest of a defence force chief in the Pacific, especially an Australian coming to arrest a commander of the Fiji Military Forces”, he said.

Noting that the then NZ Police chief,  Howard Broad “had more sense” than Hughes to reject the request,  Commodore Bainimarama said the arrest attempt “didn’t surprise him” and he believed that Andrew Hughes was acting on the instructions of the Australian Government.

“I have no doubt about that. The government of the day (Qarase’s SDL) were puppets in the hands of the Australians so Hughes was doing the bidding of both the Qarase government and the Australian Government”, he said.

The Fijian leader said the arrest attempt did not change his behaviour in any way. “We’d already made up our minds on what we were going to do and that was to remove Qarase,” he said.

PERSONAL VENDETTA

He also launched an attack on Mr Lal and Mr Hunter, claiming they were engaged in a personal vendetta against him.

“You should look at the writers. They are not credible people. Victor Lal runs down everyone in Fiji. So does Russell Hunter”.

The prime minister said Mr Hunter was motivated by anger that he’d been expelled from Fiji after 2006.

“He got the kick from here so obviously he will try and retaliate,” Commodore Bainimarama said.
Picture

JUDICIAL MUSICAL Chairs: Convicted Suva lawyer and NFP NAIDU's court docket taken over by A-G's Office and new Judge assigned to case. What about Prasad-MrsTaniguchi case, for CJ hearing case Suspended?

8/3/2023

 
Picture

The Chief Justice Kamal Kumar was hearing Mrs Ari Taniguchi's judicial review challenge against the A-G and DPP NOT to prosecute BIMAN PRASAD. The case had been adjourned to 21 March for further legal submissions. On 30 January CJ Kumar was SUSPENDED as Chief Justice by President Wiliame Katonivere after allegations of misbehaviour. In Naidu's case, the Judge who found Naidu guilty of bringing Fiji judiciary into disrepute and was going to sentence him (Naidu) has FLED to Sri Lanka. 
This week Biman Prasad appointed Richard Naidu to chair the Financial Review Committee.
Coming soon: We will reveal inaccuracies in the A-G Chamber's affidavit calling for the dismissal of Mrs Taniguchi's case, and a separate Legal Opinion on why DDP Pryde was wrong to discontinue the charges against NFP leader and Rabuka's Deputy PM and Finance Minister

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Fijileaks: In its affidavit dated the 3 February 2023, the A-G's Chambers erroneously claims that Prasad was NEVER charged, when there is significant amount of evidence that he was charged and bailed to appear in court on 15 November 2022.
*On 8 November the DPP intervened and discontinued the case against Prasad. Our legal opinion challenges Pryde's decision (which we will publish at a later date).
*Shockingly, the NFP has removed from its Facebook page all the postings regarding the case against its leader, including confirmation from the party's general secretary that Prasad had been charged with two counts of indecently insulting or annoying a female. However, other evidence proves that the A-G Chamber's is WRONG to claim that no charges were filed against Prasad. PERJURY IN A-G's Affidavit?:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

CONVICTED LAWYER Chairman of Prasad's Fiscal Review COMMITTEE. Richard Naidu is awaiting sentence after he was found guilty of bringing judiciary into disrepute. Shocking appointment but in Fiji, 'Law is an Ass'

7/3/2023

 
Picture
Picture

Fijileaks: The judge who convicted Naidu has FLED Fiji and we are in the dark when the Suva lawyer will now be sentenced. He was going to call FIVE witnesses to mitigate on his behalf.
​*We have nothing personal against Naidu but it is shocking, in fact, deplorable, that someone who could even be sent to PRISON, has been appointed by Prasad (himself facing a judicial review challenge from Mrs Ari Taniguchi for DDP deciding not to prosecute him) to chair the Fiscal Review Committee that has been tasked to develop appropriate expenditures, revenue, and taxation for the country.
The Committee has 14 members:
•(Chair) Richard Naidu– Commercial and taxation lawyer and a partner of the law firm of Munro Leys
•(Deputy Chair) Lisa Apted – partner of KPMG Fiji, chartered accountant and tax professional (sister of Jon Apted who is partner, Munro Leys)
•Reaaz Ali – company Director and entrepreneur from Nadi
•Vani Catanisiga – Co-ordinator of the Fiji Council of Social Services
•Edwin Chand – a company director and businessman from Labasa
•Neelesh Gounder – Economist and Deputy Head of School (Research) at the School of Accounting, Finance and Economics at The University of the South Pacific
•Matelita Katamotu – a business adviser and eco-tourism entrepreneur in Namosi
•Fantasha Lockington – Executive Director of Fiji Hotel and Tourism Association
•Kirti Patel – Librarian and community activist from Lautoka
•Pradeep Patel – Partner of BDO Fiji, a chartered accountant and tax professional
•Naibuka Saune – Chief Executive of Merchant Finance Limited
•Viliame Takayawa – A company Director and member of the SODELPA Management Board
•Barry Whiteside – A company Director and former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Fiji
•Mereia Volavola – A business consultant and former chief executive of the Capital Markets Development Authority. 
*Most are welcome appointments but we also have NFP lackey and USP economist Goundar, the librarian and failed NFP candidate Kirti Patel (141 Votes), Labasa businessman Edwin Chand, son of failed NFP candidate Pramod Chand.
Welcome to Prasad's new Fiji, Oops, Khaiyum's 'Old Crony Fiji' 
Missing Industries: No one from Agriculture, Mining, Timber, Aviation, Education, Building, Shipping, Aviation and Oil industries. Prasad, the so-called 'Smart KaiIndia' Finance Minister, should have examined which major industries contribute to taxes, and he should also have asked FRCA to provide him a list first of high tax paying industries. It seems the new 'Smart KaiIndia' doesn't understand corporate Fiji. What about his NFP political chamcha and the real monetary economist WADAN NARSEY? He is missing from the list.

Picture

What a JOKE. Here is the failed NFP candidate Kirti Patel: 141 VOTES

Picture
Picture

Pradeep Patel – Partner of BDO Fiji, a chartered accountant and tax professional.
Fijileaks: Our Founding Editor-in-Chief first encountered PRADEEP PATEL in 2008 when he (our Editor) exposed that Coupist Bainimarama's Interim Finance Minister and line manager of FRCA, Mahendra Chaudhry, was hiding $2million from the Fijian taxpayers in Sydney bank account. 
NALIN PATEL  and PRADEEP PATEL, as partners in the firm of G. Lal & Co, now trading under the franchise name BDO & Associates of Level 10 FNPF Place, 343 Victoria Parade, Suva, were representing Chaudhry and dealing with FRCA regarding the $2million.
​We will reveal full details later but we had reported the brothers to the DPP for further investigation

Picture
Pradeep Patel
Picture
Nalin Patel
Picture
Picture
2004: The questionable Harbhajan Lal letter to FIRCA – Forgery or Falsification of Facts?

16 June


FIRCA writes to Mr Chaudhry granting him extension till 15 August 2004 to provide information in relation to investments held overseas

14 August

Nalin Patel of G. Lal & Co writes on behalf of Mr Chaudhry to FIRCA asking for an extension till 15 September. Informs FIRCA that Mr Chaudhry has appointed him as his tax agent and confirms that the information was being completed

18 August

FIRCA grants extension

6 September

Nalin and Pardeep Patel of G. Lal & Co meet FIRCA’s Madhu Sudhan (now working with G.Lal & Co) and state that information would be submitted by 15 September 2004

9 September

Harbhajan Lal of Haryana or someone purporting to be him writes his letter to Mr Chaudhry regarding the funds collected in India

13 September

Nalin Patel writes to FIRCA asking for further extension of time until 15 October 2004

21 September

FIRCA writes to inform no further extension will be granted after 15 October

5 October

FIRCA officials meet with Nalin Patel in Madhu Sudhan’s office to discuss Harbhajan Lal’s letter; seek more substantive evidence to support the letter (see 5 October “Note” for full details)

22 October

FIRCA writes to Nalin Patel regarding the evidence he had on hand at the 5 October meeting

Agree to amend the income tax returns

Refuse to allow tax credits due to lack of documentary evidence


FIRCA still to pursue the source of funds

Document (Harbhajan Lal letter) explaining source of funds insufficient for FIRCA purposes


10 November

Mr Chaudhry pays $86,069.62.

In 2008 Victor Lal wrote to Nalin Patel before publishing his findings on 24 February 2008 but Mr Patel never acknowledged or replied to a series of questions sent to him.

​On 20 August 2012 Victor Lal wrote to Nalin Patel asking the following questions


Dear Nalin

Bula.

Did You/Pradeep read the contents of Harbhajan Lal's letter dated 9 September 2004, which is in direct contrast to the evidence you were presenting to FIRCA on his [Mr Chaudhry’s] behalf?


When was the first time you came into possession of Harbhajan Lal's letter?

From all the correspondence to FIRCA there are so many inconsistencies - the letter was written on 9 September and you chaps were still asking for extension on the 15 September.

Please note that I am not blaming you for anything but I need to ascertain certain facts

Warm regards

Victor Lal

Three days earlier, on 17 August 2012, Victor Lal had written to Nalin Patel:

Bula Nalin

You may recall I contacted you regarding Mahendra Chaudhry's tax details. You neither acknowledged nor replied to my set of questions that I had sent you in 2008.

To date, I have not been able to locate Harbhajan Lal in Haryana, and now Justice Goundar's judgment quotes a letter from Delhi Study Group, which was never a part of your exchanges, on behalf Mr Chaudhry, with FIRCA in 2004.

I would be very grateful if you could comment on the attachment, especially with the Prime Minister calling upon accountants to take a more active role in the Constitution making in Fiji.

When did you submit that Harbhajan Lal letter dated 9 September 2004 to FIRCA that year?

Did you have a copy of the Delhi Study Group letter dated 12 October 2004 also but chose to submit the Harbhajan Lal one?

Look forward to hearing from you.

Warm regards
Victor Lal

RACIAL INSULT. SASHI KIRAN is Assistant Minister for Women, Children and Poverty Alleviation. With Lynda Tabuya lording it up on global stage, Rabuka appoints Health Minister Lalabalavu as acting 'Women Minister'

6/3/2023

 
Picture

And Biman Prasad wraps himself in the political sari without protesting on Sashi Kiran's behalf.
*Why have Assistant Ministers if the Rabuka-Prasad-Gavoka Coalition bring a Minister from another department to act as ACTING MINISTER? *We were told Assistant Ministers are needed to run an efficient government. 

Picture
Picture

Imagine appointing someone as Deputy Speaker instead of NFP's Lenora Qereqeretabua, who is the official Deputy Speaker.
*The snub to Sashi Kiran is another proof that Fiji is heading toward i-Taukeization of the country.
​SHAME, and SHAME especially on NFP leader BIMAN PRASAD.
*In fact, Kiran should have been appointed Minister for Women, Children and Poverty Alleviation, and not 'cash-rich' Lynda Tabuya.
The Coalition government should hang its head in shame as we commemorate International Women's Day.

GENDER EQUALITY = RACIAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST KIRAN

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Beyond 33% – The Economic Empowerment of Fiji Women and Girls. The REPORT's author Wadan Narsey should tell his political chum and NFP leader Biman Prasad to appoint more women to Boards, not men 'chums'

5/3/2023

 
Picture
NFP chums: Prasad and Narsey
Picture
Picture

THE PATELS: DAKSESH PATEL, the Australian based, non Fiji resident,  son of NFP stalwart and businessman VINOD PATEL, was recently appointed by BIMAN PRASAD to the ATH Board.
*The appointment is no different from Bai-Kai dictatorship government. Daksesh Patel was (maybe still is) Aiyaz Khaiyum's best mate, and donated to FijiFirst Party, in breach of the Political Parties Act.


Picture

​*He is still on the FNFP Board. The Government owns 49% of ATH and FNFP 51%. There is a clear conflict of interest, and DAKSESH PATEL must be fired from both the boards. 
*In July 2022, while calling on the FFP government for transparency in the sale of Fiji Airways shares, Rabuka had expressed his concerns about the conflict of interest that many Fiji Airways board members had with people like Daksesh Patel and Sanjay Kaba.
*Biman Prasad, on the other hand, in December 2016, was calling for an inquiry into the Vinod Patel company, including another FFP funder R C Manubhai: 
​
"Government must institute an independent investigation to determine how many millions of dollars of taxpayer funds has been paid to two hardware companies (Vinod Patel and R C Manubhai) despite them failing to supply building material under the Help for Homes Initiative, specifically designed for swift rehabilitation following devastation caused by Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston."
Fijileaks 
to Finance Minister Biman Prasad: SACK DAKSESH PATEL

Picture
Picture
Conclusion

The statistical data in this Report is a mixture of positive news and negative news in all the areas of Employment, Average and Total Incomes, Unpaid Household Work and Leisure activities.


The economy has not grown healthily, discouraged by the 2006 coup and COVID. Females have increased their Labour Force employment more than Males who have gone backwards slightly. But the increases for Females have been in generally low income jobs.
​
The Female Average Incomes have not kept pace with Male Average Incomes, and hence the % Gender Gaps in Average Incomes have widened. Nevertheless, the increase in numbers employed in Paid Work have still been large enough to counter the reducing average incomes, resulting in the overall result that the Female share of Total Incomes has slowly been rising.

That trend may have stopped during COVID and may even have reversed. The next EUS (probably in 2023-24) will give some definitive statistics. Although Males are increasing their unpaid household work, they are still not doing enough household work. Females are still doing the bulk of the Unpaid Household Work in the Labour Force, the Student Population and Other categories such as the retirees.

The extra burdens imposed on Females in the Labour Force are resulting in extremely high levels of Total Work per week (in excess of 60 hours per week), especially for Employees, Employers and Self-employed. There is naturally a resulting reduction of time for leisure activities for Females, beginning from Primary School ages and extending into the working ages and retirement.

There is also a serious problem of Females not participating in sports beginning from primary school with the gender gaps with Males increasing into working ages and retirement. This lack of participation in sports has serious implications for their health and physical wellbeing. Part of the problem is the lack of physical sports facilities, as well as cultural attitudes. There is a problem of significant proportions of men devoting excessive time to kava gatherings, reducing their ability to undertake their fair share of unpaid household work. 

Click to read the FULL REPORT here

From Fijileaks Archive, 7 December 2016

Picture

Fijileaks: We should not be surprised with the behaviour of R C Manubhai
Ltd. According to the Auditor-General’s Report for 2013 (which Khaiyum only released after the 2014 election), $543,251 was paid to R.C. Manubhai for house materials that were not fully delivered to Cyclone Evan victims. "The recipients of the assistance could not commence with the rehabilitation works due to part supply of materials  from the supplier despite payment already made." But Khaiyum did not act to stop R C Manubhai from being involved in the Help for Home Initiative after Cyclone Winston. He had either not read the A-G's 2013 Report or was rewarding one of the FFP financial donors.


Aiyaz Khaiyum also appointed four directors from R C Manubhai on boards (FDB, LTA, WAF chair and FRA chair) and one from Vinod Patel
(FEA chair). We say remove them, and launch special probe into their companies Help for Home Initiative payment scam. These companies must not be permitted to "ride out the storm" despite Khaiyum "shutting the gates on them after the horse has bolted" - with cyclone victims having swiped their Help for Home Initiative credit cards with them

Picture
​"Government must institute an independent investigation to determine how many millions of dollars of taxpayer funds has been paid to two hardware companies despite them failing to supply building material under the Help for Homes Initiative  specifically designed for swift rehabilitation following devastation caused by Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston. The Attorney General and Minister for Economy’s announcement that hardware companies Vinod Patel and R C Manubhai will not be part of the 2nd phase of this Initiative and would have to pay a nominal interest and penalty due to their failure to provide hardware material to victims of TC Winston is simply not good enough. The AG’s statement is like “shutting the gate after the horse has bolted”. These two largest hardware companies in the country have already been paid millions of dollars after they swiped the Help of Homes Initiative cards despite knowing fully well that they did not have the rebuilding material. This is similar to obtaining money under false pretences." NFP Statement

"The 2nd phase of Help for Homes  Initiative is worth $20 million. But the first phase was worth $88 million. The two largest companies of R C Manubhai and Vinod Patel would have enjoyed the largest share of funds worth $88 million allocated for the Initiative, given their dominance of the local hardware industry. It is only fair that an independent investigation is instituted into the Initiative to establish claims of possible corruption and mismanagement as well as why and how these two companies received payments without supplying building material."
​December 5, 2016
 
MEDIA RELEASE
 
Independent investigation needed into Help for Homes Initiative

 
Government must institute an independent investigation to determine how many millions of dollars of taxpayer funds has been paid to two hardware companies despite them failing to supply building material under the Help for Homes Initiative  specifically designed for swift rehabilitation following devastation caused by Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston.
 

The Attorney General and Minister for Economy’s announcement that hardware companies Vinod Patel and R C Manubhai will not be part of the 2nd phase of this Initiative and would have to pay a nominal interest and penalty due to their failure to provide hardware material to victims of TC Winston is simply not good enough.
 
The AG’s statement is like “shutting the gate after the horse has bolted”. These two largest hardware companies in the country have already been paid millions of dollars after they swiped the Help of Homes Initiative cards despite knowing fully well that they did not have the rebuilding material.
 
This is similar to obtaining money under false pretences. Any ordinary citizen who would have done the same thing, would have been swiftly charged and hauled before the Court. It also shows Government’s calling for expression of interest and selecting companies to supply material appears to have been a cosmetic exercise because it failed to ascertain whether each company had the stock necessary to supply material. And in the event it was out of stock, what was the timeframe to   obtain, import and supply material?
 
Cyclone victims are still waiting for supply, six months after they visited these hardware outlets and purchased building material under the Initiative. Many are still living in tents and temporary shelters, and even under the open sky because the small tents are being used for safekeeping of their household items. 
 
But the hardware companies have already been paid. The AG is treating this as a trivial matter when it is an issue of rebuilding lives. He should be transparent and accountable to the taxpayers and inform the nation how much each of the two hardware companies ( Vinod Patel & R C Manubhai) have been paid  from the $88 million provided under phase one of the Initiative. And what is the total amount paid to each of the two companies for non-supply of material.
 
The AG must also revisit his statements on this issue from April 2016 and how he glorified the whole Initiative and the ability of Government and hardware companies to help the victims swiftly rebuild their homes. At the same time Government moved the False Information Bill in Parliament, which was enacted on 26th April, prescribing heavy fines and imprisonment terms for people who falsified claims of damages to their properties.
 
The Opposition had then  pointed out in Parliament that while Government was going beyond the Crimes Decree to penalise people under the False Information Act, there was no legislation prescribing strict compliance by hardware companies to the Help for Homes Initiative.
 
We had also pointed out that Government should have accepted our suggestion of providing a sum of $5,000 each to TC Winston victims to rebuild homes. This would have allowed people to shop for building material at different hardware outlets and would have been more efficient and effective.
 
The 2nd phase of Help for Homes  Initiative is worth $20 million. But the first phase was worth $88 million. The two largest companies of R C Manubhai and Vinod Patel would have enjoyed the largest share of funds worth $88 million allocated for the Initiative, given their dominance of the local hardware industry.
 
It is only fair that an independent investigation is instituted into the Initiative to establish claims of possible corruption and mismanagement as well as why and how these two companies received payments without supplying building material. Government seemingly ignored concerns raised by the Opposition very early into the Initiative that cyclone victims were not being supplied the material they paid for with the Help for Homes Initiative cards.
 
No business must ever be allowed to charge money for service it cannot provide. To do so would be considered a scam.
 
Authorised by: -
 
Hon Professor Biman Prasad
NFP Leader
 

BEG TO DIFFER WITH RICHARD NAIDU: Two prominent women lawyers IMRANA JALAL and MAKERETA WAQAVONOVONO beg to differ with Naidu on his reading of Constitution (s78) on Bainimarama's suspension

4/3/2023

 

They endorse our Founding Editor-in-Chief's Opinion in the Fiji Times,
​25 February 2023:

Picture
Picture
Lal
Picture
Jalal
Picture
Waqavonovono
Picture
Naidu
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
‘Bainimarama cannot remain a member of the Constitutional Offices Commission under Section 78 of the 2013 Constitution of Fiji.’

According to Suva lawyer Richard Naidu (‘Bainimarama remains as Leader of the Opposition, February 19, The Fiji Times), the FFP MP Frank Bainimarama, despite his suspension from Parliament for breach of privilege, not only remains the Opposition Leader but, among other constitutional roles, retains his membership in the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).

Mr Naidu was relying on Section 78 of the 2013 Constitution of Fiji.  We, however, beg to differ with Mr Naidu’s interpretation regarding Mr Bainimarama’s membership of the COC. Let us examine the Standing Orders of the Parliament of Fiji (Standing Order 15(3)(1) that was amended by the FFP government and gazetted on February 20, 2017.

What rights do a Parliament member forfeits on suspension by the Privileges Committee?

A member who is suspended from the service of Parliament under Standing Order 76 or 77 must not do any of the following: a) enter the Chamber; b) vote; c) serve on a committee; d) lodge a question or notice of motion.
Despite Mr Naidu’s view, we would like to argue that Mr Bainimarama cannot serve on the COC. Although it is not technically a committee, for there are standing, select, and special committees, the COC is an extended committee of Parliament.

The word “commission” is absent from the Standing Orders of the Parliament of Fiji. Standing Order 127 provides for the establishment of a Privileges Committee.

This committee comprises the following members:
1. the Deputy Speaker, the Chairperson of the Committee; and
2. five members appointed by the Speaker in consultation with the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition.

The mandate of the Committee is to: a) bring to the attention of Parliament any breach of privileges of Parliament committed by any person; b) consider any question of privilege which may be referred to it by Parliament or by the Speaker; c) inquire into any complaint that may be referred to it by Parliament or the Speaker regarding any breach of privilege by any person; and d) provide reports and recommendations to Parliament as a result of such referral.

Last week, the Privileges Committee advised Parliament on Mr Bainimarama’s suspension and penalties.

The Parliament, the supreme authority to make laws, voted to suspend Mr Bainimarama. The COC, by extension, is linked to the legislature.

While expressing his views on Bainimarama’s suspension, Mr Naidu conceded that there might “be a legal argument” to his interpretation of Section 78 of the Constitution. On Mr Bainimarama’s continued membership of the COC, we argue that on suspension, he forfeited the right to COC membership. Mr Bainimarama must resign from COC.

If he refuses, the Privileges Committee will reconvene and remove him from the COC. The drafters of the 2013 Constitution had not envisaged a situation whereby the Leader of the Opposition had to be suspended from Parliament for breach of privilege.

In this case, Mr Bainimarama. He was meant to rule for eternity.

And any non-FFP MP found guilty by the Privileges Committee – Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu, Tupou Draunidalo, and Ratu Isoa Tikoca – were given the boot out of Parliament.

We argue that Mr Bainimarama is booted out of the Constitutional Offices Commission.

It is unacceptable that while he is barred from partaking in constitutional matters inside Parliament, he is free to sit outside Parliament on the COC and deliberate on issues of national and constitutional importance to Fiji. Otherwise, what is the point of suspending him from Parliament?

The Standing Orders disqualify him from serving on any committee or commission after the Privileges Committee suspended his primary membership of Parliament. Out must mean Out. Tuba. Tuba.
Picture
FijiFirst leader Voreqe Bainimarama remains as Leader of the Opposition despite his suspension from Parliament on Friday for breach of privilege, according to Fiji constitutional lawyer Richard Naidu.

Naidu told the Sunday Times he believed that Bainimarama was entitled to retain the salary and other rights that go with the job — although “there might be a legal argument” about that.

He said that the Leader of the Opposition was different from other MPs who had previously been suspended.

He is not an ordinary MP. His position is established under the Constitution. Under Section 78, he is elected from among the Opposition members,” he said.

“Under Section 78 of the Constitution, he keeps his job even after the dissolution of Parliament.”

Naidu said the Opposition Leader had other constitutional roles outside Parliament, including being a member of the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).

“He is also one of the people who may nominate a new President for Parliament to vote on under Section 84.

‘Must not be varied’

“It seems that he can continue to do these jobs — and to keep his salary, which Section 80 of the Constitution says “must not be varied to his disadvantage”.

“Other suspended MPs have had their salary payments suspended while out of Parliament.

“So there might be a legal argument about that.

“But other suspended MPs did not hold a substantive office as Mr Bainimarama does.”

Naidu said that despite the suspension, Bainimarama remained an MP — however, he could not attend Parliament for three years.

“While he is suspended, he is not replaced in Parliament. This means the voting strength of the FijiFirst Party drops to 25 while he is suspended.

“It is for the Opposition MPs to work out how they will operate in Parliament while Bainimarama isn’t there. But while he continues to hold the post, a new Leader of the Opposition cannot be appointed.

Could be voted out

“Under the Constitution, if a majority of Opposition members want Bainimarama out, they could vote him out.

“He could resign as Leader of the Opposition only and keep his seat as an MP. Or he could resign both as Leader of the Opposition and as an MP.
​
“If he resigned as an MP, a new FijiFirst Parliamentarian would come in; the next one on the list of candidates who missed out in the 2022 election.”

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Click here to read Full Report
Picture

RABUKA'S CULT FOLLOWERS DISILLUSIONED: CHAUDHRY expresses frustration over continued rebuff over Tarakinikini's appointment to UN and following Fijileaks lead, questions the Wise and Chand appointments

3/3/2023

 
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
The 2000 Birds of Feather re-emerging together, Rabuka and Tarakinikini

Fijileaks: We were told that it is only RABUKA who can remove the Bai-Kai DICTATORSHIP. But we kept responding, saying just wait-and-see when Rabuka begins appointing his own cult followers.
*Manoa Kamikamica, who was no where to be seen since 2006 in Fiji, now tells us that Filipo Tarakinikini's appointment is money saving temporary appointment and the position will be advertised, and Tarakinikini will be free to apply, and if he satisfies the interviewing panel, he will be selected.
*But, readers, we are talking about Fiji. The advertisement will just be a cunning ploy, to confirm the temporary position to permanent.
*The 2022 election taught us one lesson - how not to conduct your campaign. Both, Mahendra Chaudhry and Savenaca Narube, focused all their energy and attack on FFP, especially on Bainimarama and Khaiyum, when what was required of them was to turn the heat on Rabuka-Biman coalition. It was obvious the two (Rabuka and Prasad) were stealing votes from FFP and winning over the fed up VOTERS.
*But the two political leaders (Chaudhry and Narube) were hedging their bets, hoping to win a seat each, and entering a coalition pact.
*We hear Narube might still be elected to the Fiscal Financial Review Team, hence mostly quiet as a political church mouse on Coalition government. 
From Fijileaks Archive, January 2023

Picture
Picture
Picture

*Meanwhile Chaudhry says the fact remains that the appointment of Tarakinikini is in breach of the rules of establishment in the civil service. He says the rules do not permit the appointment of a person from outside the service to a position in an acting capacity.
* Chaudhry now says as a consequence, the acting appointments of Pita Wise as Permanent Secretary at the Prime Minister’s Office, Parmesh Chand as Permanent Secretary at the PSC and Tarun Patel as Acting CEO of FBC are all also in breach of the rules.
* He says he is informed that the contract of Dr Satendra Prasad who remains listed as Fiji’s Permanent Representative to the UN expires in April 2023. Chaudhry asks why was it then necessary to replace him earlier as he could have continued in office while arrangements were made to advertise and fill the position in the normal manner.
* The FLP Leader says Tarakinikini’s reported return to Fiji poses new questions.

Source: Fijivillage News

Picture

CAKING RABUKA rather then getting Him CONVICTED for his
role in 2000 Coup and the overthrow of the Chaudhry government

Picture

​"Deposed Prime Minister Chaudhry, after being released, said he had been told of Rabuka's complicity by the leader of the CRW unit in parliament, Ilisoni Ligairi. In talks with Chaudhry, Ligairi had claimed he was very angry with Rabuka because he had ditched them at the last minute."

Speight not real coup mastermind - minister

21 August 2000
Suva


As an uneasy calm settles in Fiji after the storm of the past couple of months, the search is underway for the real mastermind behind George Speight's failed May 19 coup.

Poseci Bune, minister for agriculture in the deposed government of Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, set the rumour mill turning with his disclosure that Speight had revealed, minutes after taking the government hostage, that he was not the real leader of the coup.

Speight told the hostages as he tied them up that they would be surprised to learn the identity of the coup leader, claimed Bune.

"So we had to wait about 40 minutes as he was making calls ... and telling us that we will be surprised that he is not the real leader, as the real leader will arrive for us to see him".

Finally, Speight realised the man would not surface and he would have to brave it out. "I think he is going to be late. Well, I have to take it on from here," he told his captives.

Rumours are rife in the Pacific nation that the coup mastermind remains at large while the 17 people closely identified with Speight during the coup now face treason and conspiracy to treason charges on the island prison of Nukulau, just east of the capital.

Two-time coup leader and former prime minister Sitiveni Rabuka has not been above suspicion.

Seven of the special forces men who stormed into parliament that day and held members of the government hostage for 56 days were from the counter revolutionary warfare unit (CRW).

Just a few weeks earlier, they were training on Rabuka's estate on Vanua Levu. The former prime minister has denied giving them permission to do so.

On May 14, the anniversary of his 1987 coup and four days before Speight's coup, Rabuka officiated at a church service with the CRW men where he reportedly told them they would be called on to protect indigenous rights.

Bune said they were told by CRW officers that Rabuka had indicated they would be called on to do something from which some of them might not return.

As in 1987, the elite team was not told beforehand of the exact nature of their May 19 assignment.

"A few of them jumped off the van when they realised where they were going," said army spokesperson Major Howard Politini later.

Rabuka, himself, has always vehemently denied any involvement with Speight's coup.

However, deposed Prime Minister Chaudhry, after being released, said he had been told of Rabuka's complicity by the leader of the CRW unit in parliament, Ilisoni Ligairi.

In talks with Chaudhry, Ligairi had claimed he was very angry with Rabuka because he had ditched them at the last minute.

Within an hour or so of the coup, Rabuka had turned up at parliament, ostensibly as the mediator in negotiations between the hostage-takers and President Sir Kamisese Mara.

According to diplomatic sources, Mara at the time expressed his distrust of Rabuka, although he later appointed him as official negotiator. But two days later, the hostage-takers rejected Rabuka in the role saying they no longer trusted him.

Bune believes the failure of the "real leader" to turn up was "a big hiccup" in the coup attempt: "When the army was not in a position to support the coup, the 'man' backed out immediately and left these guys in limbo."

He also revealed the names of the people who turned up to see Speight in parliament on that fateful Friday "to give their moral support because they sympathised with the cause".

Three of those who turned up to attend Speight's first meeting are now ministers in the interim administration: Tuakitau Cokanauto, minister for local government and urban development, Inoke Kubuabola, information minister and formerly opposition leader during the Chaudhry administration, and Apisai Tora, minister for agriculture.

The army intends to hold its own court martial to deal with the conspirators and interim President Josefa Iloilo has promised the appointment of a commission of inquiry into the coup.

But whether these inquiries will reveal the real face of the man behind the May 19 coup, is a moot point.

Nevertheless, some are wondering whether Speight, facing trial for treason, might even reveal in court the identity of the man who failed to turn up at one of the defining moments in the country's history. - Sapa-AFP

FROM PRISON to PEOPLES ALLIANCE PARTY: As Prison Commissioner Francis Kean RESIGNS, we can't stop Laughing, Laughing and Laughing. Just look at this convicted businesswoman - PRISONER to PAP celebrity

2/3/2023

 
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
PictureHIDING HER FACE but now all over the Facebook
The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) had charged her with (2) counts of Bribery in 2017 for having offered $500 – $800 FJD to Technical Officers from the Ministry of Employment, Productivity, and Industrial Relations on two (2) separate occasions.

The Celcius Fire Protection and Pest Control owner had initially denied these charges but admitted to them before her trial was to begin in October.

In reading out the sentence Resident Magistrate Mr. Asanga Bodaragama said that Ms. Mala had attempted to abuse the good relationship she had with the public officers and use it to her advantage
by offering bribes.

Furthermore, he said that the court is entrusted with the duty of upholding the public confidence in the system of administration of justice and that bribery is a serious crime and should not be treated leniently as it affects the entire public service.

He added that the general public and law-abiding honest public servants would lose faith and confidence in the justice system if deterrent and adequate punishments were not imposed on the Accused to denounce her conduct.
​

He said that this sentence should be a clear message to any would-be offenders who dare to offer advantages to hardworking and honest public servants in order to influence them. He ordered that of the sentence, five (5) months would be served in prison and the remaining seven (7) months to be suspended for two (2) years.
​
Ms Mala was also fined $500 FJD to be paid in one (1) month or she would incur a further 50 days in prison.

Picture
Picture
Picture
Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, Siromi Turaqa
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

DEPOSED Prime Minister MAHENDRA Chaudhry to Rabuka's Coalition: 'Rescind Tarakinikini's appointment as acting Representative to the UN, his name linked to those who supported the Speight coup, CHARGE HIM'

1/3/2023

 

Fijileaks: Since NFP had been trounced in the 1999 elections, and consequently had NO MPs in Parliament in 2000, BIMAN PRASAD doesn't give a hoot about Tarakinikini's appointment. Both candidate Prasad and Wadan Narsey, SVT-NFP finance minister in waiting, had been rejected by the voters in the 1999 election

"Tarakinikini’s appointment should be rescinded and he should be brought back to Fiji to face charges on all the coup and mutiny-related allegations against him...The RFMF Board of Inquiry set up in August 2000 to investigate Army involvement in the coup questions a number of Tarakinikini’s actions at the time of the crisis, including a call he made to the Army camp at 2.30am on 19 May wanting to speak to a CRW soldier closely linked to the takeover later that morning. On the day of the coup, while LT-Col Viliame Seruvakula, Commanding Officer 3 FIR, was desperately trying to get orders for the Army to step in and stop the rioting, burning and looting taking place in Suva city, Tarakinikini advised against doing anything. He later told the RFMF Board of Inquiry that his advice to the Army command was: “Until we receive a legal order, Suva can be gutted …but we cannot go out now.”"
​FLP leader Mahendra Chaudhry

Picture
Picture
Tarakinikini with his predecessor Prasad
Picture
​Fiji Labour Party condemns the appointment of former RFMF officer Colonel Filipo Tarakinikini as Fiji’s Acting Permanent Representative to the United Nations.

“We urge Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka to reconsider the appointment,” said Labour Leader Mahendra Chaudhry.

“ Tarakinikini’s name has been closely linked with senior RFMF officers who supported the 2000 coup and army intelligence reports showed him attending destabilisation meetings with former Police Commissioner Savua and ethno-nationalist Apisai Tora prior to the 2000 coup.

“Tarakinikini escaped being brought to justice when former Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase facilitated his appointment as Senior Planning Officer with the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations in New York in March 2001. He stayed in this position for 20 plus years unable to return to Fiji under the Fiji First government,” Mr Chaudhry said.

Former Army Commander and Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama had made it clear that he would be arrested on his return to Fiji to answer to charges relating to the 2000 coup and the Army mutiny in November of that year.
George Speight named him to take over as RFMF Chief of Staff in the plot to remove Army Commander Bainimarama days after the takeover in Parliament. Later, at the time of the Army mutiny, he was again named to takeover as Chief of Staff by the rebel CRW soldiers involved in the mutiny.

The RFMF Board of Inquiry set up in August 2000 to investigate Army involvement in the coup questions a number of Tarakinikini’s actions at the time of the crisis, including a call he made to the Army camp at 2.30am on 19 May wanting to speak to a CRW soldier closely linked to the takeover later that morning.

On the day of the coup, while LT-Col Viliame Seruvakula, Commanding Officer 3 FIR, was desperately trying to get orders for the Army to step in and stop the rioting, burning and looting taking place in Suva city, Tarakinikini advised against doing anything.

He later told the RFMF Board of Inquiry that his advice to the Army command was: “Until we receive a legal order, Suva can be gutted …but we cannot go out now.”

“Tarakinikini’s appointment should be rescinded and he should be brought back to Fiji to face charges on all the coup and mutiny-related allegations against him.

“The appointment is also irregular and in breach of the establishment rules in the civil service in that a person cannot be recruited to an acting position from outside the service,” said Mr Chaudhry.

Picture
Forward>>
    Contact Email
    ​[email protected]
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    August 2026
    July 2026
    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012