Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

Fijileaks to Fiji Broadcasting Commission CEO Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum: "When is INCITEMENT not an INCITEMENT"? When it is YOUR FBC antagonizing hatred against indigenous Fijians:NO ONE IS ABOVE LAW?

23/10/2016

0 Comments

 

The Fiji Times has been penalized once before under your brother's Media Decree for publishing a Letters to the Editor; and its bosses have been dragged before the court for publishing another - frankly speaking, we had not even seen the 'LETTER', and so must have many Fijians, but Wasea Bhasha has a wider reach and audience - for being a
State channel

Fijileaks to DPP: 'It is alleged that Nemani Bainivalu and Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum of Fiji Broadcasting Commission, made, or caused to be broadcast, statements in the iTaukei, Hindi, and  English languages that is likely to incite dislike, hatred, or antagonism of the
i-Taukei community'

Picture

* Indigenous Fijians are inferior because they fail in universities and they spend more time participating in sports

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

In booting Opposition Whip Ratu Isoa Tikoca out of Parliament, the FFP dominated Privileges Committee stated it was protecting Fiji's children from his (Ratu Isoa's) type of racial profiling and vilification of the Muslim community. But what about FBC's Nemani Bainivalu and
Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum?:
* Indigenous Fijians are academically poor because they do not know how to read in English

0 Comments

$22million Fiji Development Bank loan to INSULT native Fijians on FBC TV? Fiji Hindi speaking Nemani Bainivalu, the host of Wasea Bhasha, insults i-taukei on his program; in 2014 he had whacked a "KAILOMA"

21/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

* Indigenous Fijians are inferior because they fail in universities and they spend more time participating in sports - FBC's Nemani Bainivalu

Picture
REDUCED FROM HEROES TO ZEROS: Fiji's Olympics Gold winners with FFP Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama

* Indigenous Fijians are academically poor because they do not know how to read in English:

Picture

* The teachers are ineffective because they are mostly "grog dope":

Picture
Picture
See Victor Lal on FBC Loan:
http://www.coupfourandahalf.com/2012/07/khaiyums-22million-bank-loan-to-set-up.html
Picture
Picture

From Fijileaks Archive

Picture
Picture
Picture

Ratu Isoa OUT of Parliament

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Like the Fiji Times trio, Bainivalu can be accused of making antagonistic comments against the native Fijians, comments which non-native Fijian school children could employ to look down on native Fijian students as academically DUMB. And FBC CEO Riyaz Sayed Khaiyum could be charged alongside Bainivalu, despite Riyaz Khaiyum claiming that any suggestions of INCITEMENT are not correct!

From Fijileaks Archive, 31 January 2016:

Picture

Nemani Bainivalu's Official Apology in native Fijian (below):

Official Apology - English Version
Official Apology - Hindi Version
0 Comments

DAYLIGHT 'Buturaki': Police Commissioner says men 'wanted criminals'

21/10/2016

0 Comments

 

Meanwhile, "The Soko Trial" hears from Special Police Constable: 'I heard Soko screaming in pain'; the SPC said he saw two officers grind chillies into a Coca-Cola bottle and using hand gloves they rubbed the crushed spices onto the two victims private parts; he said his second statement to police given a few days later was a lie.

A MEMBER of the Police Strike Back Team in Suva says he heard Vilikesa Soko screaming out in pain when he was allegedly kicked and punched by members of the Criminal Investigations Department.

Special Constable Apete Naikolo said he could not stand what was being done to Mr Soko and robbery suspect Senijieli Boila when they were allegedly sexually assaulted and raped in a hillside at Yalavou near Malevu, Sigatoka, on August 15, 2014.

He made the comments during the trial of police officers Manasa Talala, Seruvi Caqusau, Kelevi Sewatu, Penaia Drauna, Filise Vere, Viliame Vereivalu, Jona Davonu, Senitiki Natakasavu and soldier Pita Matairavula. The nine are charged with the sexual assault and rape of Mr Soko, who died in hospital, and Mr Boila.

Mr Naikolo said he travelled from Suva to the site of the alleged incident with three of the accused.

He said when they arrived at the area where the suspects were taken, his team leader Viliame Vereivalu, Jona Davonu and Pita Matairavula boarded the police truck which Mr Soko was travelling in.

Mr Naikolo said he saw the three men "kick and punch" the deceased and heard Mr Soko shout "in pain".
The special constable said the second victim who he did not know was injured.

He said the man was outside the truck, sitting on the ground, handcuffed and had visible injuries on his face.

Mr Naikolo said he saw two officers grind chillies into a Coca-Cola bottle and using hand gloves they rubbed the crushed spices onto the two victims private parts.

He said he waited by his vehicle with another police officer while the nine suspects allegedly assaulted Mr Soko and Boila.

Mr Naikolo said a few days later he was contacted by one of the members of the strike back team — Mr Vereivalu — to give an account of what transpired during the arrest of the two suspects and he was also asked not to include details of the alleged assault.

He said his second statement to police given a few days later was a lie.

According to the state witness, the fabricated statement given on August 21, 2014, by Mr Naikolo said that his team led by Mr Vereivalu, Mr Davonu and Mr Matairavula were not part of the group of officers that had allegedly assaulted and raped the two robbery suspects.

He said his statement given on December 9, 2014, contained a true account of what happened at the Yalavou hillside. Source: Fiji Times

From Fijileaks Archives:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
State counsel Lee Burney with Vilikesa Soko's dad Jeremiah Soko at the High Court in Lautoka
0 Comments

Sugar chief Khan's resignation explanation sour pill for NFU to accept. Chaudhry claims Khan may have abused position for personal gain

20/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The National Farmers Union questions the sudden resignation of FSC CEO and former executive chairman Abdul Khan, citing health problems as the reason.

NFU general secretary, Mahendra Chaudhry described Mr Khan’s claim that he was leaving after putting FSC and the sugar industry in a good position as utter nonsense.

On the contrary, his resignation brings relief to cane farmers who have consistently complained about the high-handed manner in which he ran FSC and dictated to growers’ organisations.

Mr Chaudhry said that Mr. Khan leaves the corporation in deep financial mess and without holding its AGM for the financial years ended 31st May 2015 and 2016, and without presenting its audited accounts for those years to the shareholders.

“We wrote to the Prime Minister’s Office on 14 June 2016 requesting suspension of Mr. Khan pending investigation into a number of matters which, in our view, established culpable offences of serious corporate malfeasance on his part. Evidence that Mr. Khan may have abused his position for personal benefit was provided to the PM’s Office,” said Mr Chaudhry.

On 26 August, we wrote to the Governor Reserve Bank and the CEO FRCA to look into the matters reported to the Prime Minister’s Office. All of them acknowledged our letters.

Following these developments, Mr Khan was removed as Executive Chairman but, was, surprisingly, appointed CEO FSC on 8 September 2016. He was replaced by Mr. Vishnu Mohan as chair.

And now just a few weeks later, we are asked to believe that Mr. Khan has resigned over health issues.

This is not acceptable. It is not a proper manner of dealing with someone who has a lot to answer for his stewardship of FSC over the last 5 years.

As far as NFU is concerned Mr. Khan’s resignation must not be accepted, and he must not be allowed to leave without being fully investigated and dealt with as appropriate.

Picture
Picture
Picture
The former Fiji Sugar Corporation chief Abdul Khan ties the KNOT in a lavish wedding at Denarau
Picture
October 20, 2016

MEDIA RELEASE

ABDUL KHAN MUST ONLY STEP ASIDE AND BE INVESTIGATED; RESIGNATION MUST ONLY BE ACCEPTED AFTER COMPLETION AND OUTCOME OF INVESTIGATION


The Chief Executive of the Fiji Sugar Corporation Abdul Khan who handed in his resignation to the FSC Board of Directors during its meeting yesterday (Wednesday 19th October) must only immediately vacate his position to allow for an independent and thorough investigation to be carried into his handling of operations of the Corporation for more than five years.  

Mr Khan’s resignation must not come into effect immediately but until after the completion and outcome of independent investigations. He should only step aside now to ensure independence of the investigation process.

Relinquishing his position immediately with several questions remaining unanswered about both his and the FSC’s performance and the Corporation’s lack of direction during his reign is unacceptable and against good governance in a organisation in which taxpayers have a stake through majority ownership by Government.

The performance of FSC’s mills, questionable projects and the one-man handling of both FSC and marketing of sugar cannot be tolerated by cane growers any longer. The industry has now lost every fibre of transparency and accountability. This has now become intolerable.
 
Annual Reports of four years from 2011-2014 show FSC is technically insolvent and its liabilities are more than $225 million to the combined value of FSC’s assets.

In Mr Abdul Khan, FSC has had a CEO who as Executive Chairman did not hold the Corporation’s AGM for four years until May last year. He was a Board Member from October 2009 till December 31st 2010. From 1st January 2011, he was FSC’s Executive Chairman enjoying hefty salary, perks and privileges while FSC’s debt continued to rise astronomically. The AGM for 2015 has not been held more than 10 months after the end of the year.

There have been many allegations labelled against Mr Khan especially about his salary, perks and privileges. Appointments are allegedly not based on merit. The procurement of mill equipment from India is also highly questionable because it is extremely necessary to establish whether tenders were called by FSC. It is also very important to establish the amounts and types of equipment procured and whether all of it was solely used in the mills. And if not where is the remaining stock of the equipment?

Any shareholder in a company should be concerned, especially if it happens to be the Government, which is the largest shareholder and has pumped in several millions of dollars of taxpayer funds in loans and guarantees into FSC.

When announcing Mr Khan’s appointment as FSC Chairman, the Prime Minister and Minister for Sugar credited him for improvements to the industry.

But once again, this Government demonstrated that the appointment was to try and save the technically insolvent FSC at the expense of writing off its Government loans and subjugating cane growers through the Reform of the Sugar Cane Industry and Sugar Cane Growers Fund (Amendment) Bills, which have been totally rejected by growers.

Furthermore, his recent CEO appointment was seemingly part of FSC’s Strategic Plan that has never been revealed to the cane growers who are the largest and the most important stakeholders in the industry. They genuinely fear reduction in their income with change to the formula determining sharing of proceeds from sale of sugar from the current 70/30 in favour of growers.

Therefore the Fiji First Government had rewarded him with the CEO’s position.

If Government is really concerned about the viability of FSC, it should immediately authorise an independent investigation into the management and operations of FSC to determine the truth.

We re-iterate that Mr Abdul Khan should immediately step aside to ensure freedom and independence of the investigation process. But his resignation should not be immediate and only come into effect upon completion and outcome of the independent investigation process.
 
Authorised by: -

Professor Biman Prasad
NFP Leader



0 Comments

PROS AND CONS OF ZONING: Education Minister correct, to a point? School zoning is to ensure people utilize schools in their area - Reddy

20/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Education Minister Dr Mahendra Reddy says the reason for the school zoning policy is to ensure that people utilize the schools in their area.

While some people have raised concern about this issue, Doctor Reddy says that if people do not want to send their children in their zone then the ministry would have to close the school in their area. 

Doctor Reddy says there are exceptions when the school is not offering particular subjects.

Doctor Reddy says the zoning policy means students must enroll and attend the school in their zones.

He says that zoning will ensure that all schools are adequately inhabited and there will be no overcrowding in schools as free choices in school enrolments will be restricted. 

The Education Minister says this will further lead to the improvement of quality performance by all schools.

He says that there are exceptional cases which are given due consideration. Some of these situations can be preferences to take up vernacular subjects, for example, Hindi studies, Na Vosa Vaka Viti, Urdu which may not be offered by all schools, preferences for certain subject combinations which may not be available in the nearest school and attending religious studies at faith based schools hence attending schools outside the zone.

Doctor Reddy says students already in a school outside a zone may continue at the same school.

The Minister says that people need to understand that this is not a blanket policy for all as there are extracts of the policy which cover the range of concerns that people have.  

He says those that are not understanding the policy must not create undue confusion but seek audience with the Education Ministry. Source: Fijivillage News

0 Comments

NFP President: Remove the Blacklist and show Fiji is truly democratic

20/10/2016

0 Comments

 
October 20, 2016
 
MEDIA RELEASE
 
REMOVE THE BLACKLIST AND SHOW FIJI IS TRULY DEMOCRATIC – DRAUNIDALO
 
The President of the National Federation Party, Hon Roko Tupou Draunidalo today said that the Prime Minister, Voreqe Bainimarama needs to follow through rhetoric with action and lift the travel bans on all individuals including former Fiji citizens, who have been barred from entering Fiji for speaking out against the military dictatorship in the aftermath of the December 2006 coup.
 
Last weekend the PM announced in Australia that any journalist would be free to visit the country and report without restriction once they have been accredited by the Department of Information. This also referred to three prominent journalists from New Zealand and Australia who were banned from entering Fiji.
 
The Prime Minister has also just urged Fijians in Australia to take advantage of the dual citizenship that Fiji now offers, return to Fiji and build a house or start a business and come and go as they please and be global citizens.
 
However all this will remain just tokenism unless bans against those who have served Fiji loyally in their capacity as expatriates as well as former Fiji citizens remain in place.
 
Ms Draunidalo said that the Prime Minister now needs to remove the so-called “black-list” that’s with the Immigration Department that prevents former and current Fiji Citizens from returning to Fiji, the land of their birth.
 
“The name of academics Professor Brij Lal and his wife, Dr Padma Lal, as well as other individuals who have been placed on this list for frivolous, undemocratic reasons, must be removed if the Prime Minister really wants to show the world that Fiji is a robust democracy.”
 
“Inviting Fijians to return home for simply financial and economic reasons, is not being global at all. They have their families, friends, cultural roots and identity here in Fiji and have the best foundation to contribute to Fiji’s social and economic progress. “
 
“The fact that remittances is reported to be easily Fiji’s second largest foreign exchange earner after tourism, says a lot for the generosity, cultural ties and the greatest asset that we have – in the Fijians overseas, who keep sending through funds to their homeland.”
 
Ms Draunidalo also called on the Prime Minister to be transparent with the usage of taxpayers’ funds to fund members of his entourage to Sydney and to New Zealand.
 
“First of all, we saw the Commissioner of Police was in that delegation. Now why was the Commissioner of Police accompanying the Prime Minister to a Fiji Day function at the same time when the DPP’s Office has confirmed the inefficiencies of his office in detaining members of the Opposition, including the NFP Leader, Professor Biman Prasad.”
 
“The Commissioner of Police should have been all throughout here in Fiji, attending to the spiraling crime cases, police brutality and thinking out long-term, sustainable and lawful solutions without taking the all too easy, draconian solution of arming the Police Force,” Ms Draunidalo added.
 
The NFP President also outlined that an NFP Government will remove the blacklist and will repeal the excessive powers given to the Immigration Minister, Prime Minister or any other minister, public official or organization that is not fair and just in a democratic society.
 
“This also includes removing any legislation that infringes on basic civil and political rights, and following through with action, including ceasing the harassment and arbitrary arrest of its citizens.”
 
“We will be guided by recognised international benchmarks and our commitments and not by anyone’s own personal version of what the standards are.”
 
“And as I’ve earlier mentioned, we will also reduce the allowances and emoluments of Ministers and Assistant Ministers." 
 
The Prime Minister who is currently in Australia is enjoying a daily travel allowance that received a massive 300 percent increase on the old rate that was decreed on 3rd October 2014.
 
The National Federation Party was the only party that voted against the increase in emoluments and allowances and has refused to take on the increases despite a Parliamentary vote for it.
 
Authorised by: -
 
Hon Roko Tupou Draunidalo
NFP President

0 Comments

FIJI MUSLIM LEAGUE celebrates 90th Anniversary-CONGRATULATIONS!

20/10/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture

"The executive of the [Fiji Muslim] League cannot and does not represent the political opinion, views, philosophies of individuals or the bulk of Muslims in Fiji. These self appointed guardians do not speak for the masses...Most Muslims in Fiji know that certain officials treat the League and its branches as their own little fiefdoms. Fiefdoms, where nepotism is known to be rampant at most times; where certain families and individuals have reigned as executives literally for decades; where children and families of well-to-do officials benefit from scholarships which were and are meant for poor students; where chairs of numerous committees are held by single individuals; where businessmen and business interests are over represented..."
Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum,
University of Hong Kong, August 2000

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Sr Nur Jehan Dean Life Member of Fiji Muslim League receiving Commemoration Plaque on 90th Anniversary Celebrations of the Fiji Muslim League which was presented on 11th Oct 2016.

From Fijileaks Archive, 28 April 2016:

Picture

"Most Muslims in Fiji know that certain officials treat the League and its branches as their own little fiefdoms. Fiefdoms, where nepotism is known to be rampant at most times; where certain families and individuals have reigned as executives literally for decades; where children and families of well-to-do officials benefit from scholarships which were and are meant for poor students; where chairs of numerous committees are held by single individuals; where businessmen and business interests are over represented; where women, the youth, various provinces and other denominations are either underrepresented or not represented at all; where appeals to religious dogma and unity are utilized in response to queries of administrative/financial discrepancies and where certain individuals view the League merely as a means to acquire access to power, influence and ultimately money - all under the guise of protecting Muslim interests...The executive of the League cannot and does not represent the political opinion, views, philosophies of individuals or the bulk of Muslims in Fiji. These self appointed guardians do not speak for the masses."

Letter: Critique of FML decision to make submission to Constitution Commission

by A S Khaiyum

The claim by some executive members of the Fiji Muslim League ('League') that Muslims support a review of our [1997] Constitution [of Fiji] and demand separate seats merely because the executive says so is a gross misrepresentation of the views of the everyday and majority of Muslims in our country.

The executive lack the mandate to speak as a representative body for Muslims since the League has been and is essentially an administrative institution managing and maintaining mosques, schools, orphanages, a sugar cane farm and real estate.

In addition to the lack of mandate the arguments and justifications espoused by the executive for a review and separate seats are flawed. They are flawed because our [1997] Constitution [of Fiji], in particular the Bill of Rights, namely, sections 38(2) and 35 more than adequately guarantee and protect religious freedom and minority rights. Indeed if an almost identical South African Bill of Rights provision protects the rights of the minority South African Muslims then what is so special about and differentiates Muslims in Fiji?

On the basis that last century the then nascent League made submissions on separate seats, it is argued today that so called Muslim rights will be achieved if these seats as submitted then are allocated now. To refer to a resolution passed some seventy years ago, in an era with its own specificities and dynamics, as justification for separate seats in today's Fiji illustrates a complete ignorance and denial of our political, social and constitutional history/experience as a nation-state.

Indeed if we were to hark back and uphold the standards of 1929 then commoner indigenous Fijians and women would not have the right to vote. Fiji and the rest of the world have moved along. Clearly such absurd referrals to the past illustrate an enormous vacuum in basic critical thinking and analysis, discourse and a general prevalence of obscurantism within the executive.

Furthermore, it aptly demonstrates a complete ignorance of contemporary developments in and interpretations of Islamic law and jurisprudence vis-a-vis constitutional, human rights and international law and conventions. More tragically, however, the opportunism of the executive displays the absence of and lack of belief in justice, compassion, selflessness and basic human decency.

Most Muslims in Fiji know that certain officials treat the League and its branches as their own little fiefdoms. Fiefdoms, where nepotism is known to be rampant at most times; where certain families and individuals have reigned as executives literally for decades; where children and families of well-to-do officials benefit from scholarships which were and are meant for poor students; where chairs of numerous committees are held by single individuals; where businessmen and business interests are over represented; where women,the youth, various provinces and other denominations are either underrepresented or not represented at all; where appeals to religious dogma and unity are utilized in response to queries of administrative/financial discrepancies and where certain individuals view the League merely as a means to acquire access to power, influence and ultimately money - all under the guise of "protecting Muslim interests."

Indeed the absence of proper representation, transparency, accountability and ultimately legitimacy also plague other local institutions in contemporary Fiji.

The executive of the League cannot and does not represent the political opinion, views, philosophies of individuals or the bulk of Muslims in Fiji. These self appointed guardians do not speak for the masses.

Therefore, the current administration and all Fiji Islanders must understand and recognize the majority of Muslims who believe in basic human decency, justice, democracy and constitutionalism reject the idea of separate seats and/or a review of our [1997] Constitution [of Fiji].

Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum
University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
[email protected]

Fijileaks: Our founding Editor-in-Chief Victor Lal is completing at Oxford a book length study titled ‘The British Crown and the Crescent-Encounter and Accommodation of Islam in the Colonies’, which includes the history of Indo-Fijian Muslims in Fiji, and the Fiji Muslim League. The study is examining the formation and politics of the All India Muslim League in British India and its impact on Muslims in the British colonies. Victor Lal is focusing on the formation of 'Muslim Leagues' in Fiji, Sri Lanka, Guyana, Trinidad, Malaysia, Singapore, and Kenya. He is also expanding and converting his lecture, ‘Religion, Violence, ISIS and Gandhi’s Encounter with Islam and Caliphate’, which he delivered at the Centre for Peace Studies, University of Tromsø, Norway, in October 2015, into a monograph. A copy of the lecture can be obtained from Victor Lal via e-mail: [email protected]

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
1 Comment

FNUGATE UPDATE: High Court to rule on former FNU Vice-Chancellor Ganesh Chand's permanent stay application on 16 December; his lawyer says Chand was "given clean slate" so is immune from any prosecution

19/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

FICAC lawyer Rashmi Aslam argues Chand had no authority to approve the payment for former Education Minister Filipe Bole’s treatment. He says as per the requirement of the scheme, the member has to pay $100 annually to benefit from the scheme, has to be below the age of 60 and the limit for the benefit is below $200,000. Aslam told the court that Bole made the payment of $100 in 2014 and not in 2012 when his payment was approved. He says Bole was above the age of 60 and the payment was more than $200,000. Aslam challenged the defence lawyer to tell them if there was $750,000 deposited in the staff welfare scheme and making payment of $213,905.05 is in the good faith. Source: Fijivillage News

Court to rule on Ganesh Chand’s permanent stay application

Suva High Court Judge Justice Achala Wengappuli will rule on former Vice Chancellor of Fiji National University Ganesh Chand’s permanent stay application on the 16th of December.

Both counsels made their submissions today.

Defence lawyer Devanesh Sharma told the court in his submission that the Fiji National University and Chand had signed on a deed and FNU had given him a clean slate when his contract was terminated.

Sharma says no one from FNU can come and give evidence in court as they are bound by the deed.

He told the court that the welfare scheme for the FNU council members was implemented on the 2nd of November 2012.

Sharma says the then Minister of Education and the Chairman of FNU, Filipe Bole made the request to Chand for his treatment under the scheme on the 14th of November, 2012.

He told the court that Chand facilitated the request made to him.

FICAC lawyer Rashmi Aslam said in his submission that the witnesses can come to court and give evidence.

He says the staff welfare scheme was implemented on the 10th of December, 2010 and it was said that the scheme will run for one year after which it will be reviewed and modified if there is a need. 

Aslam says that Chand had no authority to approve the payment for Bole’s treatment.

He says as per the requirement of the scheme, the member has to pay $100 annually to benefit from the scheme, has to be below the age of 60 and the limit for the benefit is below $200,000.

Aslam told the court that Bole made the payment of $100 in 2014 and not in 2012 when his payment was approved.

He says Bole was above the age of 60 and the payment was more than $200,000.

Aslam challenged the defence lawyer to tell them if there was $750,000 deposited in the staff welfare scheme and making payment of $213,905.05 is in the good faith.

Chand has been charged with one count of abuse of office by FICAC.

It is alleged that Chand while being employed in the Public Service as the Vice Chancellor of FNU, allegedly abused his authority by approving the payments for overseas medical treatment for the then Minister of Education and the Chairman of the FNU Council, Filipe Bole without the approval of the FNU Council, which was prejudicial to the rights of FNU and the Council. 

Chand’s bail has been extended.


Picture

1 April 2015:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Defence lawyer Devanesh Sharma told the Fiji High Court in his submission that the Fiji National University and Chand had signed on a deed and FNU had given him a clean slate when his contract was terminated. Sharma says no one from FNU can come and give evidence in court as they are bound by the deed

Picture
Picture
0 Comments

PUBLIC ORDER ACT, nor its amendments, provide an offence for failing to apply for a permit, rules DPP as Rabuka and others face no charges!

18/10/2016

3 Comments

 

"However, whilst the arrest and detention was legally justified under the Act, I have concerns that it took the Police five days after the meeting
to act when they must have been aware that the Divisional Police Commander had not granted the permit. It would also appear that the Police were selective in who they arrested, given that a large number of people had taken part in the public meeting.”
- DPP Pryde

Picture

* Insufficient evidence to sustain a charge for a breach of the Public Order Act in so far as there was no intention on the part of these persons to attend the meeting in breach of the Act;
* Neither the Public Order Act, nor its amendments, provide an offence for failing to apply for a permit.
* Insufficient evidence to charge anyone in relation to a possible charge of incitement contrary to section 48 of the Crimes Decree.
* Have concerns that it took the Police five days after the meeting to act when they must have been aware that the Divisional Police Commander had not granted the permit.
* Also appear that the Police were selective in who they arrested, given that a large number of people had taken part in the public meeting. - DPP

3 Comments

THE SOKO TRIAL: "My son could not recognize me" - Jeremiah Soko 

17/10/2016

1 Comment

 
Dad's cry for justice

Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Fiji Times


"MY son could not recognise me."

These were the words of Jeremiah Soko, the father of Vilikesa Soko — a man who passed away in August, 2014, allegedly from injuries caused by rape and assault after he was apprehended by authorities.

Mr Soko was the first to take the witness stand for the State as the trial into his son's death started at the High Court in Lautoka yesterday.

He said he visited his son at the Intensive Care Unit at the Lautoka Hospital on August 19, 2014, after being informed of his condition.

The emotional father said he found his son on life support.

Manasa Talala, Seruvi Caqusau, Kelevi Sewatu, Penaia Drauna, Filise Vere, Viliame Vereivalu, Jona Davonu, Pita Matairavula and Senitiki Natakasavu have been charged in relation to Soko's death.

The accused appeared before Justice Aruna Aluthge and pleaded not guilty to charges of rape, sexual assault and defeating the course of justice.

Mr Soko relayed to the court, including the four assessors, that he was not informed of his son's condition by police.

He said the extent of injuries on his son prompted him to lodge a complaint with police.

The State, represented by Lee Burney and Juleen Fatiaki, then informed the court that the trial was a culmination of Mr Soko's complaint, which was thoroughly investigated by the police force's Internal Affairs Department.

Also taking the stand was Inspector Epeli Senitiri, who interviewed Mr Caqusau and Mr Vere following the complaint.

Copies of both interviews were then read out in court by Insp Senitiri.

Defence counsel Iqbal Khan argued that the procedure used to interview the two accused persons was not "correct" and that it was in breach of the police force standing orders.

The trial continues.

From Fijileaks Archives:
http://www.fijileaks.com/home/the-soko-death-file-fijileaks-stand-vindicated-eight-police-officers-and-one-military-officer-charged-with-manslaughter-assault-occasioning-bodliy-harm-and-alternative-count-of-rape-of-suspect-vilikesa-soko
http://www.fijileaks.com/home/cloak-and-dagger-over-soko-death-now-qiliho-claims-the-police-officers-have-been-suspended-with-full-pay-yes-after-fijileaks-exposed-and-highlighted-the-double-standard-surrounding-the-soko-death-case
http://www.fijileaks.com/home/police-baton-and-robbery-suspect-vilikesa-sokos-death-rear-admiral-bainimaramas-police-caused-sokos-death-by-shoving-their-police-bation-up-the-deceaseds-rear-causing-massive-internal-bleeding
http://www.fijileaks.com/home/brutal-proof-here-is-the-evidence-of-rear-admiral-voreqe-bainimarama-and-his-lawmaker-khaiyums-police-brutality-yes-robbery-suspect-soko-as-revealed-by-fijileaks-was-abused-and-killed-by-regime-police-thugs

Picture
1 Comment
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Contact Email
    ​[email protected]
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012