*On 22 July 1946, the Irgun Zvai Leumi, a Jewish underground militia led by Menachem Begin, staged what would become the most infamous single attack of the British Mandate period. Disguised as deliverymen, Irgun operatives smuggled seven milk churns packed with explosives into the basement of the hotel. At 12:37 p.m., the charges detonated. | Begin: Bomber to PM |
On 22 July 1946, the Irgun Zvai Leumi, a Jewish underground militia led by Menachem Begin, staged what would become the most infamous single attack of the Mandate period. Disguised as deliverymen, Irgun operatives smuggled seven milk churns packed with explosives into the basement of the hotel. At 12:37 p.m., the charges detonated.
The southern wing collapsed in an instant. Ninety-one people were killed: 41 Arabs, 28 British, 17 Jews, and 5 others of varying nationalities. Around 45 more were injured. The dead included clerks, soldiers, hotel staff, and visitors, ordinary people who had been caught in the machinery of empire and insurgency.
The Irgun maintained that they had telephoned warnings to evacuate, but British authorities either dismissed or delayed action. For the victims, the distinction was meaningless. The King David bombing stood as the bloodiest attack on British targets in Palestine, shocking the world and staining the Zionist cause with the charge of terrorism.
Violence as a Path to Statehood
The Irgun justified their violence as part of a broader war for independence. They and other groups, the Lehi (Stern Gang) and, at times, the Haganah, believed that Britain had betrayed the Jewish people, restricting immigration even as Holocaust survivors languished in refugee camps across Europe. To them, bombs and bullets were the only language colonial rulers understood.
Their campaign was systematic:
- Sabotage of railways and police stations.
- Assassinations of British officials.
- Guerrilla raids to make Palestine ungovernable.
These acts, condemned internationally at the time, were also politically effective. By 1947, weary of the bloodshed, Britain announced it would end its Mandate and referred the matter to the newly formed United Nations. The result was the UN Partition Plan and, in 1948, the birth of the State of Israel.
Menachem Begin himself, once pursued by the British as a terrorist, later became Israel’s Prime Minister. The transformation from underground fighter to statesman highlights the moral ambiguities of liberation struggles: yesterday’s terrorist can become tomorrow’s founding father.
A Building as a Palimpsest
Today, the King David Hotel once again projects its original identity: a five-star residence for visiting heads of state, diplomats, and celebrities. Its polished stone walls and manicured lawns offer no outward sign of the destruction that once ripped through its southern wing. For many tourists, it is simply another stop on the Jerusalem circuit.
But history is never absent. Beneath the surface luxury lies the memory of rubble and ash, of cries under collapsed masonry, of a pivotal act of political violence that reshaped a region.
Seeing the Mr and Mrs Tarakinikini's Photograph
This is why the photograph of the couple inside the King David Hotel resonates so sharply. For them, the hotel is a venue of diplomacy, a place to lodge, to dine, to pose for photographs marking their presence in Israel. Yet behind that façade lies an uncomfortable truth: this building is also a monument to the reality that statehood in the modern era has often been born through violence.
The couple stand at a place where the line between freedom fighter and terrorist was contested in fire and stone. The Irgun’s bomb, like so many acts of anti-colonial violence across the twentieth century, from Algeria to Kenya to Ireland, reminds us that the road to independence is rarely paved only with negotiation.
Reflection
The King David Hotel thus embodies a paradox. It is a site of prestige and diplomacy, and yet it carries the scars of militancy. To stand there is to confront a lesson written in blood: that the modern world has often been built not only in conference rooms and treaties, but also in underground bunkers, in the hands of men carrying milk churns filled with explosives.
Perhaps the smiling photograph of the couple is innocent, untroubled by this history. But for those who remember, or who choose to learn, the image prompts a deeper reflection: that even the most elegant hotels can be haunted by the violence that gave birth to nations; in the bombing, the birth of Israel as a Jewish state in the Middle East.
To be continued: From Rabuka's Hooded Coup-Plotter to Hotel Diplomat: Tarakinikini’s Jerusalem Irony
