Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

CJ Gates, 'Electoral offences are properly classified as CRIMINAL. A wide range of obligations are placed under the Political Parties Act 2013'. We call on A-G Leung to remove Malimali so that FICAC can charge Prasad

17/10/2024

 

*In parachuting Barbara Malimali in as the new FICAC Commissioner, Leung, with the assistance of the President of the Fiji Law Society Wylie Clarke (who whisked Malimali away from the clutches of FICAC investigating officers), has turned FICAC into the new ANIMAL FARM. 
*Who instructed Malimali to halt the charges against Biman Prasad?
*FICAC investigators had spent months collecting incontrovertible evidence against NFP leader Biman Prasad, a political chum of Suva lawyer Richard Naidu.
*Go elsewhere with your RUBBISH, Pio Tikoduadua. We insist that the Military under s131(2) of the Constitution is now our only hope to grab Biman Prasad by the scruff of his 'shirt collar' and hand him to FICAC.

Picture
Picture

*Regarding Malimali's appointment while she herself was under FICAC investigation, we repeat what we told Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka and copied it to new Attorney-General Graham Leung: 
'Its like appointing a paedophile suspect in charge of childrens nursey'
. 

Picture
Picture
SECTION 131 (2) of the Constitution of Fiji.
*Our only hope to end this sordid, corrupt saga is for a joint military-police operation led by Brigadier-General Manoa Gadai, the Commander of the RFMF's Joint Task Force.
Picture
Picture

Fijileaks to FICAC and Attorney-General GRAHAM LEUNG
 Count One
Statement of Offence

PROVIDING FALSE DECLARATION OF ASSETS, INCOME AND LIABILITIES: Contrary to section 24(1A) and 24(5) of the Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) Act No. 4 of 2013.

Particulars of the Offence

BIMAN CHAND PRASAD between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2015, at Suva in the Central Division, as the Leader of a registered Political Party, namely the National Federation Party, provided a false declaration of assets and liabilities to the Supervisor of Elections by failing declare and provide information, namely that BIMAN CHAND PRASAD was a company Director in Platinum Resorts & Hotels Limited, a limited liability company duly registered with the Registrar of Companies in Fiji contrary to sections 24(1A) and 24(5) of the Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) Act 2013.

Count Two
Statement of Offence


PROVIDING FALSE DECLARATION OF ASSETS, INCOME AND LIABILITIES: Contrary to section 24(1A) and 24(5) of the Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) Act No. 4 of 2013.

Particulars of the Offence

BIMAN CHAND PRASAD between 01 January 2016 and 31 December 2016, at Suva in the Central Division, as the Leader of a registered Political Party namely the National Federation Party, provided a false declaration of assets and liabilities to the Supervisor of Elections by failing to declare and provide information namely that BIMAN CHAND PRASAD was a company Director in Platinum Resorts & Hotels Limited, a limited liability company duly registered with the Registrar of Companies in Fiji contrary to sections 24(1A) and 24(5) of the Political Parties (Registration, Conduct, Funding and Disclosures) Act 2013

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Statement of Offence
ATTEMPTED TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE: Contrary to section 190 (e) of the Crimes Act 2009
Particulars of Offence

JOSAIA VOREQE BAINIMARAMA sometime between July 2020 and September 2020 at Suva in the Central Division, attempted to pervert the course of justice by telling Sitiveni Tukaituraga Qiliho, the Commissioner of Police of the Republic of Fiji to stay away from the USP investigations that was reported under CID/HQ PEP 12/07/2019.
Picture
Picture
State v Bainimarama - Judgment and Sentence [2024] FJHC 278; HAA016.2024 (9 May 2024) BETWEEN:
THE STATE
APPELLANT
​

and: JOSAIA VOREQE BAINIMARAMA
FIRST RESPONDEN 
and
:
SITIVENI TUKAITURAGA QILIHO
SECOND RESPONDENT

​

"It was not right for you to tell the second respondent [Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho] to stay away from investigating the alleged mismanagement of taxpayer’s fund at the University of the South Pacific by top senior officials, who appear to be citizens of Fiji. The second respondent was the Commissioner of Police. The second respondent’s brief as Police Commissioner was guided by section 5 of the Police Act 1965. It was mandatory for the second respondent to prevent and detect crimes and enforce the criminal law of the Republic of Fiji. The police were investigating the USP mismanagement of funds at the time.
The police had sought the Director of Public Prosecution’s assistance. He had recommended the caution interview of the suspects. By telling the second respondent to stay away from the USP investigation, you have in a sense effectively sabotaged the police investigation. To this day, the investigation had not been completed. Your action was inconsistent with the oath of your office.

Breach of the Public’s Trust. At the material time, the second respondent was the Commissioner of Police of the Republic of Fiji. By virtue of section 129 (3) of the Constitution, he commands the Fiji Police Force and is responsible for its administration, organization, deployment and its control, and in those matters, he is not subject to anyone’s control. He is the top police officer and it is his task to lead the police maintain law and order. By virtue of section 5 of the Police Act 1965, he leads the police in preserving the peace, protecting life and property, prevent and detect crime and to enforce the criminal law of this country. However, when he, on 15 July 2020, at Suva in the Central Division, directed the Director of the Criminal Investigations Department Serupepeli Neiko and Inspector Reshmi Dass to stop investigations into the police complaint involving CID/HQ PEP 12/07/2019, he was certainly abusing his office, which was an arbitrary act, prejudicial to the rights of USP. What he did was a direct violation of section 5 of the Police Act 1965 and as such, was a breach of the public trust in him.
(ii) By acceding to the first respondent’s request to stay away from the USP investigations reported in CID/HQ PEP 12/07/2019, the second respondent violated his constitutional independence as guaranteed by section 129 (5) of the 2013 Constitution.​
In sentencing you [Bainimarama}, I am guided by section 4 (1) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act 2009, that is, to punish you in a manner which is just in all the circumstances; to protect the community; to deter others from committing similar offences and to signify that the court and community denounce what you did in Count No. 1. I start with a sentence of 6 months imprisonment. For the aggravating factor, I add 2 ½ years making a total of 3 years imprisonment. For all the mitigating factors, I deduct 2 years, leaving a balance of 1 year imprisonment. On Count No. 1, I sentence you to 1 year imprisonment.

Picture

*On the morning of Wednesday, 4th September 2024, as acting Deputy Commissioner, Francis Puleiwai had, after receiving legal advice, sanctioned that Biman Chand Prasad should be arrested and charged the following day (Thursday, 5 September) for multiple statutory declaration breaches under the Political Parties Act 2013. She was exercising her legal powers so the new FICAC Commissioner, Barbara Malimali, had no retrospective power to interfere or review the decision that was legally made to charge the Coalition government's Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Prasad.

Picture
Picture

Comments are closed.
    Contact Email
    ​[email protected]
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012