 |  |
In a move that would leave even the most seasoned satirists scrambling for words, Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has appointed Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica as Acting Prime Minister—while Kamikamica is under active investigation by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), with his mobile phone seized as part of the probe.
For a government that campaigned on transparency, accountability, and restoring public trust, this decision sends precisely the opposite message: integrity is optional, and legal clouds are politically irrelevant.
Constitutional Authority vs. Fiduciary Duty
Yes, Rabuka can appoint anyone he chooses from among his ministers to act as Prime Minister under Section 92(3) of the 2013 Constitution. But constitutional power is not a blank cheque. There is an implicit fiduciary duty owed to the public to ensure that interim leadership is free from conflicts of interest and legal compromise.
By appointing a minister who is an active subject of a FICAC investigation, Rabuka risks:
Presumption of Innocence vs. Perception of Guilt
Legally, Kamikamica remains innocent until proven guilty. However, this principle cannot be stretched into political immunity from scrutiny. Courts deal with evidence, but governance deals with public trust.
By promoting someone under investigation, Rabuka is gambling with the credibility of his own government. Even if Kamikamica is later cleared, the optics are catastrophic—Fiji looks like a country where active FICAC suspects can helm the executive.
Political Fallout: A Crisis of Credibility
This appointment plays directly into the hands of Rabuka’s critics, who have long accused him of running a government of double standards. Opposition figures will now have a simple, devastating line of attack:
“If you’re under investigation, don’t worry—Rabuka will promote you.”
For a coalition already plagued by FICAC-linked scandals involving Biman Prasad, and other senior figures, this move deepens the narrative that ethical leadership is absent.
Implications for FICAC Independence
FICAC’s credibility was already under siege. With the Acting PM now an active investigation subject, two scenarios emerge:
Either way, institutional integrity suffers. Rabuka had at least alternative Acting PM options who were untainted by active corruption investigations. By bypassing these safer choices, Rabuka signaled either astonishing political tone-deafness or deep factional debts within the coalition.
This decision is more than just bad optics; it has structural consequences:
In appointing Manoa Kamikamica as Acting Prime Minister despite his ongoing FICAC investigation, Rabuka has made a legally permissible but politically disastrous choice.
For a leader whose legacy hinges on restoring constitutionalism and integrity after years of Bainimarama’s authoritarianism, this move looks alarmingly like old Fiji politics repackaged. It sends the wrong message at home, to the region, and to Fiji’s development partners.
Rabuka had a chance to demonstrate that his government holds itself to a higher standard. Instead, he has set the bar lower than ever.
For a government that campaigned on transparency, accountability, and restoring public trust, this decision sends precisely the opposite message: integrity is optional, and legal clouds are politically irrelevant.
Constitutional Authority vs. Fiduciary Duty
Yes, Rabuka can appoint anyone he chooses from among his ministers to act as Prime Minister under Section 92(3) of the 2013 Constitution. But constitutional power is not a blank cheque. There is an implicit fiduciary duty owed to the public to ensure that interim leadership is free from conflicts of interest and legal compromise.
By appointing a minister who is an active subject of a FICAC investigation, Rabuka risks:
- Undermining public confidence in the executive branch;
- Compromising Cabinet solidarity if legal advice is required on FICAC-related matters; and
- Creating a potential conflict of duties between Kamikamica’s role as Acting PM and his status as an investigation subject.
Presumption of Innocence vs. Perception of Guilt
Legally, Kamikamica remains innocent until proven guilty. However, this principle cannot be stretched into political immunity from scrutiny. Courts deal with evidence, but governance deals with public trust.
By promoting someone under investigation, Rabuka is gambling with the credibility of his own government. Even if Kamikamica is later cleared, the optics are catastrophic—Fiji looks like a country where active FICAC suspects can helm the executive.
Political Fallout: A Crisis of Credibility
This appointment plays directly into the hands of Rabuka’s critics, who have long accused him of running a government of double standards. Opposition figures will now have a simple, devastating line of attack:
“If you’re under investigation, don’t worry—Rabuka will promote you.”
For a coalition already plagued by FICAC-linked scandals involving Biman Prasad, and other senior figures, this move deepens the narrative that ethical leadership is absent.
Implications for FICAC Independence
FICAC’s credibility was already under siege. With the Acting PM now an active investigation subject, two scenarios emerge:
- If FICAC proceeds aggressively, the government looks divided, with its own Acting PM potentially facing charges.
- If FICAC slows down or backs off, the agency will be accused of political capture, reinforcing the perception that big names are untouchable.
Either way, institutional integrity suffers. Rabuka had at least alternative Acting PM options who were untainted by active corruption investigations. By bypassing these safer choices, Rabuka signaled either astonishing political tone-deafness or deep factional debts within the coalition.
This decision is more than just bad optics; it has structural consequences:
- It erodes public trust in the executive;
- It undermines FICAC’s institutional credibility;
- It signals to investors and development partners that accountability is negotiable;
- It emboldens political opponents who can now plausibly argue that the coalition protects its own, even under investigation.
In appointing Manoa Kamikamica as Acting Prime Minister despite his ongoing FICAC investigation, Rabuka has made a legally permissible but politically disastrous choice.
For a leader whose legacy hinges on restoring constitutionalism and integrity after years of Bainimarama’s authoritarianism, this move looks alarmingly like old Fiji politics repackaged. It sends the wrong message at home, to the region, and to Fiji’s development partners.
Rabuka had a chance to demonstrate that his government holds itself to a higher standard. Instead, he has set the bar lower than ever.
Acting Prime Minister and Minister for Trade Manoa Kamikamica has once again assured the Indo-Fijian community that there is no religious intolerance and acts of sacrilege in the country.
Speaking at the Hindu peace gathering in Suva, Kamikamica highlighted that this is more than a religious event, with leaders calling it a “nation-building initiative”.
Kamikamica says that the peace event hopes to restore trust, promoting reconciliation, and bridging divides across communities. Source: FBC News
Speaking at the Hindu peace gathering in Suva, Kamikamica highlighted that this is more than a religious event, with leaders calling it a “nation-building initiative”.
Kamikamica says that the peace event hopes to restore trust, promoting reconciliation, and bridging divides across communities. Source: FBC News
 |  |
  |  |
A businesswoman charged by FICAC with two counts of bribery appeared in the Suva Magistrates Court earlier this afternoon.
It is alleged that Anita Ranjini Mala between 21st November 2016 and 7th February 2017, whilst being the proprietor of Celsius Fire Protection and Pest Control, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, offered an advantage of $500 to $800 to Inia Saqanamua who was an inspector with the Ministry of Labour, on account of Saqanamua performing an act in his capacity as a public servant. It is also alleged that Mala on 24th November 2016, offered an advantage of $500 to Anare Macedru who was a technical officer at the Ministry of Labour, on account of Macedru performing an act in his capacity as a public servant.
