One of his bail sureties CULDEN KAMEA: "Charlie, at every turn, the FSC Board has been found wanting. Surely this investigation cannot be fully and comprehensively completed without also investigating the Board."
|  Facebook blogger Charlie Charters |
ON BAIL BUT BACK ONLINE: CHARLIE CHARTERS CLAIMS WHISTLEBLOWER ALLEGED SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN INITIAL FSC INVESTIGATION TERMS
Facebook blogger and former journalist Charlie Charters, who recently confirmed that he has regained control of his Facebook account while on bail pending criminal proceedings, has posted a new claim concerning the controversy surrounding the Fiji Sports Council investigation.
Charters informed followers that he now has control of his Facebook page again and intends to continue sharing commentary about developments connected to the investigation into the suspended FSC chief executive Gilbert Vakalalabure.
In one of his latest posts, Charters said that an additional element had emerged relating to the original scope of the investigation.
According to Charters, the information came from a whistleblower who claimed that the initial terms of reference for the inquiry included an allegation of sexual harassment against Vakalalabure.
Charters wrote: “There’s one important additional piece of the jigsaw puzzle that was announced by the Fiji Sports Council deputy board chairman Peter Mazey on Thursday. According to a whistleblower, the initial terms of reference for the investigation into the suspended FSC chief executive Gilbert Vakalalabure included an allegation against Vakalalabure of sexual harassment.”
The claim adds another dimension to the ongoing debate about the Fiji Sports Council and the governance issues that have surfaced in recent weeks.
The controversy intensified earlier after the Prime Minister dismissed Jone Saukuru and asked the FSC board to suspend Vakalalabure pending investigations into matters affecting the organisation.
Charters’ latest post suggests that the original investigative framework may have been broader than previously understood, with the alleged whistleblower claiming that sexual harassment was among the matters initially raised.
It is not immediately clear whether such an allegation formed part of the final terms of reference adopted by the Council or whether it was included in the scope of the investigation that followed.
The claim has not been independently verified, and neither the Fiji Sports Council nor Vakalalabure has publicly responded to Charters’ assertion at the time of writing.
The discussion on Charters’ Facebook page has also drawn comments from other contributors, including Culden Kamea.
Kamea is one of Charters’ two sureties in the bail proceedings, has commented on the broader governance questions facing the Council.
In response to Charters’ post, Kamea wrote: “Charlie, at every turn, the FSC Board has been found wanting. Surely this investigation cannot be fully and comprehensively completed without also investigating the Board.”
In another comment accompanying a news report on the government’s actions involving the Sports Council leadership, Kamea added: “The Fiji Sports Council Board also needs to step down and be added to this investigation.”
The exchange illustrates how the controversy surrounding the Fiji Sports Council continues to generate debate beyond official announcements and into the wider public sphere.
Whether Charters’ latest claim reflects matters considered during the early stages of the investigation, or merely allegations raised by a whistleblower before the terms of reference were finalised, remains a question that only the relevant authorities can clarify.
For now, the issue adds yet another layer to the unfolding discussion about accountability and governance within Fiji’s sporting institutions, leaving readers and the public to assess the competing claims emerging from different quarters.
Facebook blogger and former journalist Charlie Charters, who recently confirmed that he has regained control of his Facebook account while on bail pending criminal proceedings, has posted a new claim concerning the controversy surrounding the Fiji Sports Council investigation.
Charters informed followers that he now has control of his Facebook page again and intends to continue sharing commentary about developments connected to the investigation into the suspended FSC chief executive Gilbert Vakalalabure.
In one of his latest posts, Charters said that an additional element had emerged relating to the original scope of the investigation.
According to Charters, the information came from a whistleblower who claimed that the initial terms of reference for the inquiry included an allegation of sexual harassment against Vakalalabure.
Charters wrote: “There’s one important additional piece of the jigsaw puzzle that was announced by the Fiji Sports Council deputy board chairman Peter Mazey on Thursday. According to a whistleblower, the initial terms of reference for the investigation into the suspended FSC chief executive Gilbert Vakalalabure included an allegation against Vakalalabure of sexual harassment.”
The claim adds another dimension to the ongoing debate about the Fiji Sports Council and the governance issues that have surfaced in recent weeks.
The controversy intensified earlier after the Prime Minister dismissed Jone Saukuru and asked the FSC board to suspend Vakalalabure pending investigations into matters affecting the organisation.
Charters’ latest post suggests that the original investigative framework may have been broader than previously understood, with the alleged whistleblower claiming that sexual harassment was among the matters initially raised.
It is not immediately clear whether such an allegation formed part of the final terms of reference adopted by the Council or whether it was included in the scope of the investigation that followed.
The claim has not been independently verified, and neither the Fiji Sports Council nor Vakalalabure has publicly responded to Charters’ assertion at the time of writing.
The discussion on Charters’ Facebook page has also drawn comments from other contributors, including Culden Kamea.
Kamea is one of Charters’ two sureties in the bail proceedings, has commented on the broader governance questions facing the Council.
In response to Charters’ post, Kamea wrote: “Charlie, at every turn, the FSC Board has been found wanting. Surely this investigation cannot be fully and comprehensively completed without also investigating the Board.”
In another comment accompanying a news report on the government’s actions involving the Sports Council leadership, Kamea added: “The Fiji Sports Council Board also needs to step down and be added to this investigation.”
The exchange illustrates how the controversy surrounding the Fiji Sports Council continues to generate debate beyond official announcements and into the wider public sphere.
Whether Charters’ latest claim reflects matters considered during the early stages of the investigation, or merely allegations raised by a whistleblower before the terms of reference were finalised, remains a question that only the relevant authorities can clarify.
For now, the issue adds yet another layer to the unfolding discussion about accountability and governance within Fiji’s sporting institutions, leaving readers and the public to assess the competing claims emerging from different quarters.
 |  |
NO Pussy-Footing from Charters. Even His Facebook Profile Picture Gets Straight to the Point, and Charters back to work after getting travel bail
 |  |
