Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

USPGATE: '[The] USP owes vendors, ex-employees, and consultants significant amounts of money that do not show up as encumbrances on the budgets. If [they did] it would show [true] picture of USP finances...'

14/2/2017

5 Comments

 

Fijileaks: We are reliably informed that Maintenance work will be contracted out to crony companies and USP maintenance staff will be made redundant in the next three months; meanwhile, read USP abuses:

"Three quotes from the open market are submitted with the PO. The line SMT signs off on the PO for the lowest amount, and then Procurement will actually go and award it to whoever they please. If the line SMT or the originator of the purchase request catches this, then the response from Procurement is that they went with the “Preferred Vendor”.  It has been brought to the attention of the VCP and the EDF that Procurement does this, sometimes going with the “Preferred Vendor” at multiple times the amount even from the highest quote from the market. When questioned, the answer Procurement often provides is that the “Preferred Vendors” provide better quality service or goods. Nothing quantifiable that could have been written in the bid for quotes, just better!" - Dr Grewal

Picture
Picture
Procurement contracts

The University obviously has policies and limits around purchasing authorities and requirements for competitive bidding. For some purchases of goods and services three quotes have to be secured, for others the tender process has to be followed. In both cases there is a lot of creativity being employed by Purchasing. For example:

 Three quotes from the open market are submitted with the PO. The line SMT signs off on the PO for the lowest amount, and then Procurement will actually go and award it to whoever they please. If the line SMT or the originator of the purchase request catches this, then the response from Procurement is that they went with the “Preferred Vendor”.  It has been brought to the attention of the VCP and the EDF that Procurement does this, sometimes going with the “Preferred Vendor” at multiple times the amount even from the highest quote from the market. When questioned, the answer Procurement often provides is that the “Preferred Vendors” provide better quality service or goods. Nothing quantifiable that could have been written in the bid for quotes, just better!

 The point of tenders is that every vendor is given the exact same information and then the award is based mostly on price and viability. This is not how tendering process is executed at USP. The process around advertising, acceptance of tenders and opening of tenders is solid and how it should be. The difference comes in when the tenders are opened and the decision made. Often times the decision is not based on price, but based on who the university wants to do the job or provide the goods or services. At this point arbitrary new conditions are introduce[d], again, such as “quality” and awards made on the basis of claims made by people based on personal knowledge or preference. If “quality” is such a significant factor, then why is it not an essential part of the EOI advertisement? How is it fair to all vendors when personal knowledge or preference is a criterion used to benefit the awardee?  Isn’t this exactly what the tender process is put in place to avoid?

 Vendors will tell you that two things are going on with quite a few EOIs at USP. One, they won’t even bother to apply because everyone already knows who it is going to be awarded to or, two, there will be cyclic bidding. Cyclic bidding is when a group of vendors are collaborating for repetitive orders by taking turns winning it. In this case say a group of the same five vendors will apply with one bidding low and the others bidding very high. All bids being higher than prevailing market rates. Next time around the same pattern will be followed, except the low bidder will be another one from the group.

 If there is any doubt that there is a lot of creativity being employed in regards to purchasing at USP, ask the VCP himself what are his experiences around “USP Pricing”. He, himself, has been complaining about the “USP Pricing.” Question is what has been done about this?

 Specific Examples: 1) Air conditioners for ITS – 3 quotes received, yet procurement wanted to give it to a specific preferred vendor at nearly twice the highest quote - USP pricing. The Procurement manager argues with the VPA about why he supports the price being nearly 2 times because of its all about quality. The VPA dials the phone on speakerphone, calls the same preferred vendor and asks for a price quote for the exact same model as on the PO and get a price nearly half of what’s being argued by Procurement as the price USP should be paying.

Another example: Three open market bids for some building repair come in the $9200-9800 range. Procurement decides to award it to a preferred vendor for about $24,000. Again, “quality” of work is stated as the reason. Repeatedly POs have been denied in writing by at least one line SMT, and procurement still goes ahead and awards/pays them. So, why require the line SMTs to sign off on the POs? Procurement Contracts Recommendations:

 External Audit. Have an external audit, directly responsible to and reporting to Council, conduct a forensic audit of procurement practices, past contracts (especially construction contracts) and the tendering process. If it is established that records and paper copies aren’t somehow available anymore, take action.  Preferred Vendor status stipulations. Make it a stipulation that the “preferred vendor” status cannot supersede price considerations when three open market quotes or a tendering process has been followed. “Preferred Vendor” only applies if their price is competitive with open market and there is something extra that is gained by going with them, example time.

 Follow standard tendering processes. Make it a stipulation that standard tendering practices are to be followed. The criteria for submission and evaluation should be the same for all participants in the EOI process. If quality or timeliness or any other such undefined criteria is to be used, then it should be defined in the EOI and not applied after the fact for the benefit of specific vendors.

 Whistleblower protections. Have a whistleblower policy with effective safeguards and direct channels of communications with Governance. 

 Rewards for fraud identification. Have a reward and protection system for people who identify fraud  

Financial responsibility and oversight

Financial oversight at USP is weak, to put it kindly. This is not about audits; this is about fiduciary stewardship of the finances of the University. The financial audits could be strengthened even more, however, that will not address the issue of where and how the money is being spent and whether or not it is a prudent decision. There are some fundamental issues that need to be looked at from a different angle other than the one presented by Administration. Ask yourselves, why is it that the FIC Chairs have been faced with so much frustration and have had to question the EDF on why certain numbers don’t match in the budget, and then next year the same question has to be asked, only for a different segment of the budget.
 
Consider the financial health of the university in context of the surplus as a percentage of the overall budget and the additional debt numbers. Contrary to the surplus picture being painted, the actual numbers tell a very different story. By policy, 50% of all earned income from trading accounts should be returned to the trading account for their use. Please check and see when was the last time 50% of the millions of dollars of earned income from Commercial were actually returned to Commercial for reinvestment? Just that simple number will show that the University is heavily in the red from an operational budget perspective and not in the black. The future of the University infrastructure is being pawned off for the current budgets to be presented in a favorable light.  
 
Faculties have line item budgets for positions. If a position in a faculty/department is vacant, then that money should belong in the faculty for the Dean to decide how best to use it. This is not what happens. The money is reclaimed into the VCP chest for him to use it however he pleases. Nothing wrong with it, since he needs the flexibility to run the University and address priorities; the problem arises in that positions are deliberately stalled or not filled because the University does not have money to fill all positions. Just to verify this, conduct a simple exercise: Have someone fill the numbers for every approved and budgeted position at the University and see what that does to the budget picture currently being presented by Administration. Money is being “saved” at the cost of quality. The Strategic Plan 2013-2018 says that by 2018 USP should have 60 professors. Just estimate the salary expenses for these 60 positions, and see if the current budget can even support these positions. This money should be present and available for the University to expend without further going into the red. If not, then the SP target is superfluous.  
 
Academic and support staff positions have been dramatically reduced in the last few years, in spite of the University going through fabulous increases in the number of students enrolling at USP. USP owes vendors, ex-employees, and consultants significant amounts of money that do not show up as encumbrances on the budgets. If all these invoices were to be showed as encumbrances on the budget sheets, it would truly show the picture around USP finances. Meanwhile, the reputation of the University as a non-payer or defaulter is gaining steam on almost a weekly basis.
 
The University infrastructure has had limited to no infusion of cash in the last so many years. As a result, it is crumbling. In order to show favorable numbers in the overall budget, monies that were supposed to have addressed the infrastructure issues are instead spent elsewhere. All this is doing is painting a false picture of prosperity. When assets are not maintained, they become liabilities. The future of the University is being sold. Take IT for example: the infrastructure is falling apart, putting at risk the functioning of the University, and no money at appropriate levels has been set aside or infused over the years to replace this infrastructure. This is exactly what is happening to the buildings and other resources. 

There are, or at least have been, student residential building floors with no firefighting equipment because when brought to the attention of the Administration, the EDF would require Commercial to pay for it without allowing Commercial to retain the earned income from which to pay from. The future VCPs will not have the massive amounts of monies required to take care of a crumbling infrastructure. The millions of dollars in maintenance monies that have been diverted today, conveniently labeled as deferred maintenance, will require massive capital tomorrow. Where is this going to come from? The University is creating a risk for the future.
 
The University painted a very bleak picture when asking the member countries for an increase in their financial contributions. It is time to ask where that money is going.  PTAFE? Unnecessary travel? Lawsuits? Wine at every occasion? Bonuses and benefits to favorites? Exorbitant amounts of supplemental pay to favorites?
 
Outsourcing can be useful. It can also be a killer. Thus far the outsourcing of services has not been established as something that will save money. It will in fact cost more money. Further, it diminishes the capabilities of the University and puts its services at risk into the future. As an example: Outsourcing Properties and Facilities (P&F) is not saving any money, and it is going to put the University at risk during times of natural emergencies and disasters. It is hard enough to find carpenters, electricians and plumbers now in Fiji as a result of work generated in the aftermath of tropical cyclone Winston, it is going to be impossible to have any one respond in an emergency if another such natural disaster were to occur in the near future.

This is creating a risk in terms of functionality and finances. USP is also a large employer and provider for people of the Pacific. Eliminating jobs without significant gains ultimately hurts USP’s obligation to the peoples of the Pacific as an employer. Nearly 70 households will be affected without substantial benefits to the University in the outsourcing of P&F. Where is the humanity? If it is about quality of work, then that is an effective performance management issue, not a financial issue.
 
Financial policies should be applied evenly to everybody. The policy around Trading Accounts states that the university takes 20% of all expenses, not revenue, and then keeps 50% of the net earned income, returning the other half to the trading account for the department to reinvest and use as appropriate. This is the policy. How is it then that Commercial does not get a penny back from the 50% earned income monies, and PTAFE gets all of it? Practices such as these have the practical effect of adversely affecting performance and performance related awards, inhibiting reinvestment, thus creating risks, developing an environment of favoritism, and generating a culture of micromanagement where every decision is made by the EDF or the VCP because they control all money.

To be continued

5 Comments
Fiji First Party
14/2/2017 10:23:08 pm

Dr. Dilawar Grewal has done us all a humongous favour. We appreciate and we must thank Dr. Dilawar for his endeavour. Thank You, Sir. Hopefully, we would hear the Hon. Minister of Education give us some ‘alternative facts’ in this regards - Soon!

Of note, in Dr. Dilawar Grewal composition is a thorough explanation of how fair tender processes for goods and services apply (or should apply) and how those processes wantonly applied (as in the USPGate) can lead to CORRUPTION. The tender processes described, we believe, are standard (or should be) right across the spectrum for all Citizen owned enterprises, which an elected government is (or should be) the trustee -of the Citizens.

A particular tender process that interests us presently is the ‘services’ of aunty Nur Bano in various Citizen owned entities, including the Reserve Bank of Fiji. Can we and we MUST come clean on this PLEASE!

Our interest in this is purely academic and sits quite apart, from our emotionally vested and repeated ones, to do the aunty Bano’s most pitiable, IP thieving, nephew.

Crimes of misuse of tender processes and IP Thuggery are worlds apart but Crimes non-the-less. Heeding from the Dr. Dilawar Grewal’s courage, to speak his mind, professionally and in good spirits, we also feel braver, to speak ours. We invite (qere qere) brave Fiji Journalists to please dig-into and do an interesting academic discourse, to do with ‘our naam chori story’ and enlighten us with some ‘alternative facts’ from the ‘Minister of Everything’ in Fiji - including Elections and Intellectual Property – and the gross inappropriateness of his “so-called Laws” embedded in his nasty and self-promoting Decrees.

All material FACTS (not alternatives), including a SWORN Affidavit is available online in FijiLeaks achieves. Very simply in our minds, when we were registering the Fiji First Party, we were registering a ‘Political Party’ and a NOT a ‘Rotary Club’ – So what went WRONG?

And so why should we NOT continue to use OUR name – Fiji First Party - which we feel, in the essence our beings, as our Human Rights - a name which belongs to us – and ONLY US??

Answer us that -the PM and the Minister of Just About Everything in Fiji – and/or their entire minion Ministers of their CHOR Party – including the Minister of Education – who at the moment - needs to respond URGENTLY - to issues highlighted by Dr. Dilawar Grewal about some VERY glaring CORRUPTION and Dictatorial issues – which are starkly contrary to the spirit of promoting academic freedom and free thinking -at USP.

Reply
Amazed
14/2/2017 11:39:36 pm

Is Dr. Dilawar Grewal describing USP or the Government of Fiji?

We are amazed at the parallels - Dictatorial, Nepotism, Croynism, Corruption, Conflicts of interest and all performed with sheer arrogance and impunity.

Reply
FIT FOR YOUR NAME BRAVEHEART
15/2/2017 06:46:00 am

The parents of this Sardaar would and should be very proud for giving him a name that perfectly fits his persona - Dilawar (brave heart)!!!

Very few if any in his shoes would have balls to stand up against the incompetent EDF and corrupt VCP and make these disclosures which provides powerhouse of evidence why USP has been going down the drain and has lost its national and international stature that it once had under the stewardship of Dr James Maharaj. A classic example that localisation can never be the answer!!

Dr Dilawar's mini thesis about whats going on at USP should be more than enough for the Reddy to sack both EDF and VCP. But as the people of Fiji know this will not eventuate because of the nepotism and cronyism that pervades this government. The irony is Reddy himself is not qualified to be a minister and provide the required leadership to USP. He could not even run a mere Commerce Commission and his corrupt behaviour at FNU in the past is well documented.

But all may not have been lost. At least Reddy could now enlist Dr Dilawar's assistance to provide him with a road map how to successfully run USP and other universities in Fiji. From his mini thesis produced by Fijileaks so far, there is no doubt that Dr Dilawar is not just competent in his area of expertise (Administration) but the guy is as good as a professional Accountant (he speaks about value for money, good procurement practices, bottom up budgeting, organisational excellence...) and an Economist. If the EDF and VCP don't have the wits to exploit such multiple talent then they should simply do the decent thing - get lost!! Both have been parasites for so long.

And on another note, perhaps the Turbanator sardaar in the chor government should take a refresher course or counselling from Dr Dilawar on how to be a law abiding, decent and productive MP.

Bravo Dr Dilawar!!! People should pay heed to your continuing disclosures and try to emulate the courage of conviction that you display.



Reply
Bahuki
15/2/2017 03:19:50 am

Doesn't matter whom Grewal is describing, since nepotism extends its tentacles everywhere by the looks of things.

Reply
john
15/2/2017 07:25:40 am

thank you Dr Dilawar for nice comments about outsourcing of USP P&F and thinking about those staffs who will be affected but the fact is you were the one who told P&F staff that this restructure will happen and you did lead the team to out source P&F. you came down to P&F yard to conduct the meeting with staff and informing about this new out sourcing movement. when asked about cost saving you were the one who told that its all taken care off and we all P&F staffs are witness of that meeting held in MAY 2016. also you haven't informed about the renovation of your staff quarters where by you made a number of changers which bust the budget.the staffs were witness of that also. i dont support VC or you but lets speak the facts so why are you hiding your accountability.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    editor@fijileaks.com

    ARCHIVES

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    Picture
    Picture