Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Tropical Cyclone Winston

Professor Narsey's Bulletin Three: Constitution and Contentious Decrees

8/3/2014

6 Comments

 
PictureProfessor NARSEY (left) and Aiyaz Khaiyum signing his 2013 Constitution
The Bainimarama Regime has purportedly made numerous changes to the laws of Fiji, including the imposition of its own constitution, the 2013 Bainimarama/Khaiyum Constitution (2013 BKC). These laws are “operational” (i.e. being implemented by the judiciary) in the absence of any significant physical opposition or popular uprising from the people of Fiji.

Many voters will however have strong views on some of the changes implemented by the 2013 BKC.  Voters and political parties should not waste their energies on  debating the many changes which a future elected parliament will have every moral and lawful authority  to change. Voters simply need to know the stand of the political parties on the following:

Issue 1:  
Which constitution do we have now?

The average voters do not have a clue and probably do not care: they will simply go along with the Bainimarama Government who control the judiciary, army and police.

The voters will take part in the elections under whatever electoral regulations this regime decides on.  This is the pragmatic position taken by the existing political parties who simply want the return of an elected  parliamentary government.

But the ultimate judge of the validity of a constitution has to be the judiciary, which has not made, or has not been allowed to make a  judgment, following the definitive 2009 Court of Appeal.

The current situation appears confusing partly because the Ghai Constitution Commission made the critical mistake of attempting to present a “new” draft constitution, rather than an “Amendment” of the 1997 Constitution.   Readers may wish to read the following which was part of my Final Submission to the Yash Ghai Commission:

http://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/wadan-narsey-final-submission-to-yash-ghai-commission-in-segments/b-new-or-revised-constition-and-how-it-is-not-semantics/

Any constitutional revision, must itself abide by the “rule of law” already existing.  The public can recall the words of the current Chief Justice (Anthony Gates) in his ruling in the case Koroi v Commissioner of Inland Revenue (2001).

“It is not possible for any man to tear up the Constitution. He has no authority to do so.  The Constitution remains in place until amended by Parliament, a body of elected members who collectively represent all of the voters and inhabitants of Fiji…  Usurpers may take over as they have in other jurisdictions, and in some cases rule for many years apparently outside of, or without the Constitution. Eventually the original order has to be revisited, and the Constitution resurfaces .. and the courts will not assist usurpers simply because they are numerous, powerful, or even popular.”

Technically, the 1997 Constitution is still in place.  Therefore all contentious decrees or actions of the Bainimarama Government since December 2006 must be verified by a future elected parliament, or changed,  as explained in my Submission to the Ghai Commission here:

http://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/wadan-narsey-final-submission-to-yash-ghai-commission-in-segments/e-contentious-issues-should-be-decided-by-the-next-parliament/

The issues discussed further in this Bulletin 3 cannot be decided by a military dictatorship, however “progressive” some changes may appear to be, to some of our citizens.

Voters need to ask political parties whether

 (a) they support the 1997 Constitution;  and

 (b) they believe that the next elected parliament will be free to examine any changes from the 1997 Constitution, implied by the 2013 BKC and any changes proposed by the Ghai Draft Constitution.

Issue 2           
The special place of indigenous Fijians

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, was verified by the General Assembly in 2007.

While accepting the fundamental equality of all peoples, the Declaration nevertheless noted that indigenous peoples the world over have suffered marginalization through colonialism and globalization.

The UN recognized the need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in historical treaties and other constructive agreements with the state.

The UN declaration encouraged states to enhance indigenous peoples rights through consultation and co-operation with them (and not by force).

Article 5 states clearly that  indigenous people “have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions”.

Just these few references suggest that the Bainimarama Regime, through the 2013 BKC and other decrees, is forcing many changes on the Fijian people and institutions in complete contradiction of the UN Convention: abolishing the GCC, removing the term “Fijian” from the indigenous people’s exclusive use, banning the use of Fijian names of political parties, etc.).

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and their relevance for indigenous Fijians in the laws of Fiji.

Issue 3           
Great Council of Chiefs (GCC)

Some may argue that the GCC has not served either the interests of indigenous Fijians or Fiji as a whole, as well as they could have and that the Bainimarama Government was right to “close down” the GCC. The first part of this statement may well be correct, as is suggested in this article of mine.

https://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-great-council-of-chiefs-suspension-not-a-winding-up-order-but-a-wake-up-call-the-fiji-times-28-july-2007/

However, an unelected military government has no moral or legal authority to close down an institution which was an integral part of the system of governance approved by all elected Fiji parliaments. The next elected parliament will be free to resuscitate the GCC in its former or any reformed form.

Votes may ask all political parties to declare their position on the Great Council of Chiefs, following an elected Parliament.

Issue 4           
The Senate

The Senate was a useful “checks and balances” mechanism, to the elected House of Representatives- a useful “Upper House of Review” able to present a more mature perspective, less influenced by “populist” opinion. It was an integral part of the 1997 Constitution in many ways.  The next elected parliament will be free to resuscitate the Senate in its former or some reformed form.

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on the Senate following an elected Parliament.

Issue 5           
Changes to land and mineral resources legislation

It is not for the unelected Bainimarama Government to bring about any changes to Fiji’s land and natural resources legislation. These will all need to be revisited by the next elected Parliament.

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on all land legislation decreed by the Bainimarama Government, and their stand following an elected Parliament.

Issue 6           
The electoral system to be used for future elections.

The coming elections will be held under whatever regulations are issued by the Bainimarama Government.  Given the secrecy of the Bainimarama Government and non-accountability, the Fiji public still has no idea what the system will be.

However, the elected Fiji Parliament will be free to change the electoral system in way they wish.   My submission to the Ghai Commission for a desirable electoral system may be read here:

http://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/12/27/wadan-narsey-final-submission-to-yash-ghai-commission-in-segments/d-my-recommendations-for-the-electoral-system/

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on their vision of a future electoral system, following an elected Parliament.

Issue 7           
The common name to be used for Fiji citizens (“Fijians” or whatever).

For some Fiji citizens, one of the positive initiatives of the Bainimarama Regime has been the attempt to create a common national identity and common name for all Fiji citizens.

There is no dispute with the attempt to create a common national identity. However, the decreed use of the word “Fijian” to describe all Fiji citizens is contentious on a number of grounds, as I have attempted to explain here:

https://narseyonfiji.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/fijians-i-taukei-indians-and-indo-fijians-name-changes-by-military-decree/

Such name changes must not only be left to Parliamentary majority, but should require some consensus from the indigenous Fijian community who have historically been associated with this name.

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on the use of the word “Fijian” to describe all Fiji citizens, following an elected Parliament.

Issue 8           
Immunity for coup perpetrators and supporters

 While immunity may be granted by an elected parliament, such total immunity may not be granted for the abuse of fundamental human rights.  The nature and extent of the immunity that the Bainimarama Government is granting itself may be read here:

http://narseyonfiji.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/c-non-negotiable-aspects-of-the-draft-constitution.pdf

The next elected parliament will need to revisit the entire question of immunity.

Voters may ask all political parties to declare their position on immunity provisions, following an elected Parliament.


6 Comments
Babakau link
8/3/2014 04:42:34 am


Mr Waden What do you mean by testing the constitution by opposing in a form of uprising.

You meant itaukei to do it for you.

Reply
I-Taukei Warrior
8/3/2014 04:54:45 am

Babakau, you coward! Until the political decree came out, the only two high-profile dissenters and challenges to the regime have been Wadan Narsey and Victor Lal, so shut up! You regime lackey troll!

Reply
Babakau link
8/3/2014 05:19:48 am

itaukei warrior, you brand me as coward, and where you stand!

freedom nation wake up

Reply
Feel Sorry for Fiji
8/3/2014 05:40:47 am

Wadan Narsey, can you tell if there was ANY political Party that opposed the Ghai Commission because High Court also ordered a closure to Jo Singh led Constitution review process in 2001?

While the 1997 Constitution to be the only lawful constitution based on the case law you mentioned, what makes Ghai Commission and its draft constitution any more legal then the 1997 living document?

Which political parties or leaders supported Ghai Commission despite being a party to the cases and case laws since 2000?

Can you list those submitters to show who set the unlawful standards to politics in Fiji









Reply
Dreu
8/3/2014 09:49:43 pm

This is the way that democracy works. Good questions good questions that prompt good social discourse and our politicians to be accountable to its electorate.Not by the barrel of the gun by some frustrated and desperate individual. That is the Wild-west. Daku ni Kuila kinda stuff

Reply
How USP is letting the region down
12/3/2014 06:07:47 am

MORE ABOUT USP...VERY MUCH SUITED TO FIJILEAKS ...PLEASE FIND AN APPROPRIATE PLACE TO PUT THIS ON YOUR GREAT BLOG.

USP VC Rajesh Chandra should pull his head out of Bainimarama and khaiyum's arses and focus on improving the quality of graduates. The school of law, education and accounting are the worst. This has been the case for years, despite millions poured into USP.

Biggest concern is the rot at the school of education. The low-standard graduates churned out teach our children. By the time our children reach university, they know nothing. So the vicious cycle of substandard graduates is perpetuated.
For years the school of education has been in need of a big overhaul which dean Akanisi Kedrayate and VC Rajesh Chandra have failed to carry out.

The quality of education determines a country's progress. In this regard USP has been a big let down for the countries of the region. USP has not been fulfilling its mandate. The situation has deteriorated to unprecedented levels under VC Rajesh Chandra. He is not up to the task. He is serving the Bainimarama regime first, the education needs of the region, later.

Rajesh Chandra has been busy building his own personal empire, and surrounding himself with cronies, at a huge cost to USP and tertiary education. The bureaucracy surrounding Rajesh Chandra is mind-boggling.

It is funded by cuts to teaching staff and facilities, all to make Rajesh Chandra's work easier, and life comfortable, but things harder for students and staff.

For the good of tertiary education in the Pacificm this man needs to be kicked out sooner rather than later.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    editor@fijileaks.com

    Author

    "...Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy... censorship. When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, 'This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives." --Robert A. Heinlein, -If This Goes On

     Norway-Sweden Disunion: The 1905 Velvet Divorce: As Recorded In The Private Diary of British Diplomatist Sir James Rennell Rodd in Scandinavia [Kindle Edition] Victor Lal (Author);
    click link below:

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Norway-Sweden-Disunion-Recorded-Diplomatist-Scandinavia-ebook/
    d/B00QZ39714#reader_B00QZ39714
    Picture

    Categories
    The Draft Ghai Constitution 2013
    The Explanatory Report
    Appendage to Draft Constitution
    Professor Yash Ghai's Statement

    All

    Fiji Today

    Archives

    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Blogroll
    FLP website

    RSS Feed

    Fiji Trade Union Congress
    Intelligentsiya
    Fiji Democracy Now Blog
    Wadan Narsey on Fiji
    Fiji Media War
    Fiji Girl's Weblog
    Matavuvale
    Truth for Fiji
    Fiji Coup 2006
    SDL website
    ​C4.5
    Torture Watch Fiji
    Croz Walsh Blog
    Café Pacific
    Grubsheet