York, England, 2 July 2013 - Supporters of former parliamentarian and businesswoman Mere Samisoni have expressed astonishment that the military-run and increasingly impoverished Fiji government has paid for one of Asia-Pacific’s most sought-after and expensive criminal barristers to argue an obscure point of law in a Suva courtroom. London-born Clive Grossman – both a Queen’s Counsel and Senior Counsel in Hong Kong – appeared last Friday (28 June) for the government prosecution, to argue before the country’s Chief Magistrate that stay applications should only be heard in Fiji’s High Court. Grossman’s surprise involvement came as lawyers for Dr Samisoni were appearing in front of Chief Magistrate Usaia Ratuvili’s Court on Friday seeking a stay proceeding against the single count of inciting political violence that Samisoni and two others face, and arguing the Magistrates Court had complete jurisdiction to order a permanent stay. Her family allege that the charge against Dr Samisoni – who founded the popular 30-store Hot Bread Kitchen chain before turning to politics where she won the Lami Open seat on the outskirts of Suva for the Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua party (SDL) - is politically motivated. Dr Samisoni has been a tireless and outspoken critic of the regime of military strongman Frank Bainimarama who led the December 2006 coup that unseated the SDL government. Chief Magistrate Ratuvili has said that the stay application would be reserved until August 6 when he will deliver his decision. ‘It seems absolutely incredible that the Fiji government should involve a barrister of Mr Grossman’s expense to argue this point,’ said a family statement issued on behalf of Dr Samisoni, a grandmother of twelve. ‘The prosecution’s whole conduct has been about defending the indefensible with their limitless budget and a desire to abuse the legal process to dupe, delay and deny their political opponents.’ ‘Talk about using a gold-and-diamond-encrusted sledgehammer to try to crack a nut.’ Dr Samisoni was first arrested in December 2011 and charged a month later along with former SDL parliamentarian Mataiasi Ragigia, and Apete Vereti and Semisi Lasike. Ragigia died in October last year without having the chance to prove his innocence. Grossman’s earning power as one of the pre-eminent criminal barristers of his generation stands in stark contrast with the court system in Fiji, which reflects the deteriorating state of the country’s public finances. By contrast in Hong Kong, renowned barristers like Grossman could charge between HK$10,000 (FJD2,500) and HK$50,000 (FJD12,000) an hour just to study documents. Last year Grossman represented Raymond Kwok, one of the brothers at the centre of the conspiracy and corruption charges filed against Sun Hung Kai Properties. The Hong Kong Standard reported that the main lawyer to brother Thomas Kwok was retained for three years with an annual fee of HKD30 million (FJD7.4 million). But Grossman made his name helping the late Nina Wang win a legal battle for control of her late husband Teddy Wang Teh-huei's Chinachem business – after he was kidnapped in 1990 and declared legally dead in 1999. At the time of her own death in 2007, her estate was said to be worth HKD40 to 50 billion (FJD10 to 12 billion). The Samisoni family believe Fiji’s military regime’s big splash on legal counsel like Grossman signals the prosecution’s intention to find Samisoni guilty – whatever the cost – and then demand the state’s legal fees are paid by the defendant in an attempt to financially cripple one of Fiji’s few indigenous success stories. ‘This represents an abuse of process, and an abuse of civil and political human rights,’ stated the family. 2. Dr Mere Samisoni Seeks Stay on Grounds Of Abuse of Process and Human Rights. Dr Samisoni’s on-going stay application before Chief Magistrate Ratuvili has been further delayed after Defence QC Peter Williams had to argue a jurisdiction point on Friday 28 June. Hong Kong QC for the prosecution, Clive Grossman, submitted that the practice in Fiji was for the High Court to hear stay applications, where Williams had argued that Fiji’s Magistrate Courts indeed have legal jurisdiction to hear stay applications, based on Fiji and international case law, and questioned why Fiji would be only country not to grant its Magistrates the power to order permanent stays. Williams also made the point that the law takes precedence over an illegal custom and simply practising something did not make it lawful. The decision for whether Magistrate Courts can hear stay applications was reserved until August 6 when Chief Magistrate Ratuvili will deliver his decision. | 3. Fiji DPP Asked to Drop Charge Against Grandmother MP In a separate development, dangerous driving charges against Dr Samisoni could finally be dropped after magistrate Lashika Fernando asked Dr Samisoni’s lawyer Heeni Phillips to write to the Director of Public Prosecutions to obtain their consent. Phillips contended in court on June 27 that the manner in which Dr Samisoni was arrested in August last year was both unlawful and illegal and noted that the alleged accident resulted in no damage to either of the cars involved, and questioned why it required eight policemen and three police dogs to bring her into custody. The car following Dr Samisoni is believed to be driven by an officer from Fiji’s anti-corruption body, FICAC, which was set up after the military coup, and has been criticised in many quarters for hounding opponents of prime minister Bainimarama. The court was told that after her arrest Dr Samisoni was driven from one police station to another for three hours, and repeatedly questioned despite her New Zealand-based lawyer insisting that police respect her right to maintain her silence. The dangerous driving charge is due to be heard in Court on July 11. A statement released today (2 July) by the Samisoni family said: “The manner in which Dr Samisoni was arrested on 3 August 2012 was unlawful and illegal. The police did not give her reasons for arresting her. They could not provide reasons either to New Zealand legal counsel. Any female, young or old, in Suva should certainly worry about their safety if the DPP does not withdraw this charge as it certainly gives the appearance that DPP are complicit in anti-woman practices, are in favour of illegal police arrests and illegal joy riding around Suva with females who have been detained illegally. Prior to advancing their prosecution they should have taken into consideration Dr Samisoni’s age and the minimum standards of legal process for the police operation. Eight police on the back of a police truck, including three police dogs, took Dr Samisoni on a joy ride of Suva for approximately three hours before informing her she was to be charged with dangerous driving. The charge too is a fiction. The person who should have been charged was the FICAC officer who drove at high speed behind Dr Samisonis car, endangering public safety. He veered onto a side footpath to avoid ramming Dr Samisoni’s car and continued on at high speed. It is noted that certain "legal" people in the FICAC car have different versions of what occurred. Back at the Police station the officers then questioned Dr Samisoni, ignoring her legal counsel reiterating that Dr Samisoni would be maintaining her right of silence. Police also kept repeating the same questions for a number of hours. Police then illegally took her mobile with the aid of a search warrant containing false and erroneous information. Police stated Dr Samisoni had falsified documents according to the search warrant. This was a complete lie. Dr Samisoni appeared at Suva Magistrates Court last Thursday (27 June) where Heeni Phillips, barrister from New Zealand, asked Her Worship Fernando for a stay of the charge or in the alternative withdrawal of the charge. The Magistrate suggested Ms Phillips write to the Director of Public Prosecutions to obtain their consent before the matter returns to Court 11 July 2013.” |
Minting Legal Connection: Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum's Hong Kong Lawyers and Fiji
12 Comments
Jutsice Broker
2/7/2013 05:52:12 pm
I am very cross with the likes of Grossman, Madigan, Elizabeth Yan and others. It seems a lot of legal men and women in Hong Kong are using Aiyaz Khaiyum's connection to enrich themselves, not to mention those Sri Lankans. Wake up, Fiji, before most of us are behind bars
Reply
Fijileaks Reader
3/7/2013 02:34:55 am
Who is behind Fijileaks?
Reply
Raman
2/7/2013 06:16:57 pm
Dont worry yaar, Fiji has lots of money now. PNG just gave a small fortune to Fiji under the guise of election aid money but we all know where that will go, and now the USA want to give aid money for the elections. How much does the Govt need for these elections?! Last time I heard the amount needed to hold the elections was under 10Mil. We will never know where the money is spent but I understand Fiji has lots of loans to pay off. I feel sorry for Tonga who are so far in debt to the Chinese its not funny.
Reply
Ululala
2/7/2013 08:06:13 pm
we did not ask for coup..... we did not ask for the government to get this lawyer... govt of the day is manufacturing corruption at its highest level--- creating history at its worst in FIJI!!
Reply
Serilo
2/7/2013 08:27:58 pm
Justice Broker, You talking about Madigan - same Madigan who gunned down Rajendra Chodri for life?
Reply
Democracy going from strength to strengh
3/7/2013 02:09:20 pm
Tahrir Square is happening! Egyptians know how to walk their talk - President Morsi is overthrown. Chief Justice is interim President (pls don't get any ideas iCJ Gates of Fiji's junta!) and interim administration will see the country through another presidential election.
Reply
aa
4/7/2013 12:33:04 pm
a coup is a coup is a coup and there can be no justification in the case of Egypt and Fiji. in Egypt the people elected the president and the court will have to decide the legalities and justification for military intervention.,,but when u have their chief justice holding fort then u know the legal challenge will not happen.
Reply
Democracy going from strength to strength
4/7/2013 08:00:56 pm
Vinaka HP, your points are well-taken esp. with regard to changing govts democratically through the the ballot box.
Reply
hp
5/7/2013 06:11:12 am
The question I ask then is why have a constitution if the army is going to step in every now and then outside of the constitution and outside of its normal role to muscle its way on the pretext of protecting the peoples rights or even the majority of the peoples rights, which is always doubtful any ways cos who is judging. I do not think the Egypt and the Fiji situations are different in that respect and hence unjustifiable in my humble view.
Reply
Aam Aadmi
5/7/2013 04:50:27 am
Samisoni's overseas lawyer, Peter Williams, is hardly cheap either. Why is her family demostrating hypocrisy by complaining about the other party's lawyer?
Reply
Aam
5/7/2013 09:38:49 pm
Who is paying for the QC from HK who is representing the State?! The Fiji Govt, ergo the taxpayer. Are the taxpayers paying for Mere's lawyer? You schmuck.
Reply
Aam Aadmi
7/7/2013 05:52:59 am
@Aam
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
[email protected]ARCHIVES
September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 |