Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

DRITI CAGED FOR FIVE YEARS OVER KHAIYUM REMOVAL PLOT: Madigan jails former land force commander primarily on evidence of "The Reject Avenger" Major Manasa Tagicakibau 

11/12/2013

17 Comments

 
Picture
DIGNIFIED EXIT: Pita Driti, flanked by police, heads off to prison. In contrast, Francis Kean (insert, right ) the convicted killer and brother-in-law of dictator Frank Bainimarama, is laughing into our faces as Permanent Secretary for Works, Transport and Utilities. Bottom insert: The truth bender Manasa Tagicakibau taking a break during his evidence against Driti
PictureHong Kong link: Audrey Moffat and illegal A-G Khaiyum









IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Criminal Case No.005 of 2012

BETWEEN : STATE
AND : PITA RAGOLEA DRITI

BEFORE : THE HON. JUSTICE PAUL MADIGAN

Counsel : M. Korovou for the State
Mr. F. Vosarogo for the Accused.

Date of Mitigation: 10 December 2013

Date of Sentence: 11 December 2013
SENTENCE

____________________________________________________________
1. Pita Driti you have been convicted by this Court after trial of one count of Inciting to Mutiny contrary to section of the Crimes Decree 2009. The count reads:
“Statement of Offence INCITING TO MUTINY contrary to section 72(1)(a) of the Crimes Decree 2009
Particulars of Offence
Pita Ragolea Driti between the 1st day of August 2010 and 31st October 2010 at Suva in the Central Division knowing that Manasa Ralawa Tagicakibau is serving in the Republic of Fiji Military Forces, attempted to seduce Manasa Ralawa Tagicakibau from his duty and allegiance to Fiji. "

2. The relevant facts of the case were that in 2010 you were the Commander Land Forces of the Fijian Army ("RFMF"). After the Commander (who was at the time, and still is, the Prime Minister) you held the most senior rank in the army over which you had virtually unfettered control, subject to the directives of the Commander himself. On divers days in September 2010 you expressed your frustration about and your dislike for the Government and in particular for the Attorney-General, Mr Aiyaz Sayed- Khaiyum ("AG") to your Junior Officer Major Manasa Tagicakibau. Your frustration manifested itself verbally in your dislike for the influence you perceived that the A.G. had on the Prime Minister to the prejudice of the Military Council of which you were a senior member. In furthering that dissatisfaction, you expressed a view to have had him removed. There being a dispute as to what words were actually used, it was nevertheless a wish expressed to the officer in such a way that you made him think that AG was to be killed.

You asked the officer at least twice to use his own intelligence gathering cell to monitor the Attorney General as to his contacts, his social activities and any business dealings that he might be involved in, because you suspected that AG was indulging in corrupt practices. The Major understood that he was to find negative associations that would discredit the AG. Eventually in October of 2010 you revealed to the Major a plan that had been hatched to have the administration led by the Commander of the Military Forces dismissed by His Excellency the President and if the President were not to assent to this dismissal, to somehow have the President himself removed from Office.

This plan was to be put into effect when the Commander (P.M.) was out of the country visiting troops in the Sudan and in what you presumably thought was a magnanimous gesture, you would arrange for the P.M.’s family to be sent to him in exile in the country of the P.M.'s choice. It was also said that assistance would be requested from Australian and New Zealand armed forces to secure the border and to quell any internal dissent. It is an alarming and an aggravating feature of the plan that no provision was included in it for an alternative administration to that of the Commander. By "leaning" on the Major in this way you were at least attempting, if not ordering, the Major to betray his oath of allegiance to the RFMF, and to betray his allegiance to the Government of the day. Unfortunately for you the threshold of offending by this section is only attempting and you were at the very least doing that in your meetings with the Major.

3. Incitement to Mutiny is a very serious offence. The role of the military, not only in Fiji, but in most countries of the world, is to maintain peace and law and order for the citizens of a country: for the protection of national security and to defend the organs of the State from any internal dissent. What you were proposing was the complete antithesis to these concepts. Public safety and public order can only be secured by loyal and disciplined armed forces and that in itself can only be accomplished if members of the army obey orders and maintain loyalty. Any deviation from those principles is a threat to national security; it is treasonous and mutinous. Hence the the severity of this particular crime. It is not a mistake that it is listed in the Crimes Decree as an "Offence against Public Order."

4. The penalty for this offence is a term of imprisonment for 15 years. Until February 2010 when the Penal Code was in force for this same offence, the maximum penalty was imprisonment for life and in the only previous case for the offence in Fiji, State v Takiveikata HAC 005.04. (4 March 2011), Goundar J. in fact imposed the maximum of life imprisonment.

5. Although not being entirely relevant to the charge you have been convicted of, I am reminded of this Court's sentences handed down in the conspiracy to murder case in Takiveikata and ors HAC 009.08 (5 March 2010). All 8 accused were sentenced to various terms for conspiring to murder the Prime Minister in the latter part of 2007. The maximum penalty for the offence at the time was 14 years imprisonment and the principal participants in the conspiracy were sentenced to terms of imprisonment of seven years. That conspiracy was being hatched contemporaneously with your scheme to depose the PM, however there is no evidence before me that the schemes were in any way related.

6. While that case cannot for obvious reasons serve as a sentencing precedent for this case, it has similar features which can be of assistance. First the maximum penalty is almost the same (14 years for conspiracy, 15 years for inciting to mutiny). In addition the offending in both cases was anti-Government, and involved a proposal to remove both the President and the Prime Minister and to bring in foreign forces to assist. Both offences are of course extremely serious in the contemplation of the disastrous consequences of a consummation of their plans.

7. In mitigation your counsel tells me that you are 53 years old, married with children and grandchildren. You joined the RFMF in 1984 as an officer cadet and since that time you had a prestigious career in the military receiving quick promotions and serving in both Lebanon and in the Sinai. You were obviously being groomed for high status because you were sent on study courses to both Malaysia and to Australia. You ended your career as a result of these activities in 2010 with the rank of Brigadier General in the post of Land Force Commander, controlling about 80% of the Army and Navy. You were rewarded with decorations including being made an officer of the Order of Fiji.

8. You were also a senior serving member of the Military Council, a body advising the Commander as PM, both before and after the take-over in December 2006 and this Court has no hesitation in accepting this entire record as a remarkable testament of your service to this country and you must receive credit for that.

9. Your Counsel tells me that you are remorseful for what occurred. That may well be the case now that you have been convicted but I saw little evidence of remorse from you during the trial.

10. Apart from the shame which this matter has obviously visited upon you, I am told that your family will suffer in that they are obviously deprived of your income and they must survive on your wife's income as a Secretary in a Bank. I am also asked to consider your co-operation with the Police in your interview under caution.

11. Mr Vosarogo urges me to consider that apart from the attempt to incite mutiny, there was no actual mutinous act and that "because of the minimal circumstance (utterance of word only) it did not cause any eventuation of military dissent ". He extends this argument by submitting that a reduction of the penalty for the offence from life imprisonment to 15 years with the introduction of the Crimes Decree in February 2010 and the possibility that it can now be an offence tried summarily means that the Legislature intends a whole new "philosophy " should appertain to the offence which should be reflected in the sentence.

12. Both Mr Vosarogo and Mr Korovou for the State refer me to the Papua New Guinea case of Ben Wafia and ors, both in the Supreme Court (SCRA 10 of 2006) and at First Instance (CR.1433, 1434,1435, and 1436 of 2002) in which sentences for this offence were discussed. It was said at First Instance and upheld in the Supreme Court that for incitement to mutiny where there was a subsequent mutiny is very serious but where in fact there was no subsequent mutiny sentences of between a few months and five years would be appropriate.

13. While a decision of the National Court of Papua New Guinea is not binding on this Court, it is nevertheless of persuasive interest. That being so I cannot accept that subsequent mutiny with the inciter and the incitee taking part is of any relevance to the crime of attempting to incite. The crime is complete when the evidence of attempt is established and whatever happens after the attempt to incite can have no bearing on the crime whatsoever. Consequently subsequent events cannot influence the sentence. What are relevant are the circumstances pertaining at the time.

14. Mr Vosarogo urges me again to pass a short sentence and then suspend it, on the basis of your clear record, your service to the nation, the potential suffering of your family and your loss of livelihood. 15. I regard this submission as being totally unrealistic. Your good service record and dedication to the State is ruled out by your seditious and anarchistic entreaties to Major Tagicakibau to do what he could to "bring down" if not eliminate the Attorney General from the executive branch. Even your Personal Service Officer who knew you well said that in the few months when he had resumed service with you in the middle of 2010, you were a changed man and made "dissatisfied" remarks whenever you heard the Attorney-General on the Radio. As is the case with any convict being sentenced his or her family circumstances can only be of relevance in truly exceptional cases. Family and social ties are the inevitable casualty of crime.

16. As referred to earlier, it a seriously aggravating feature of this case that nothing was proposed to replace the administration that you sought to destroy. As was the situation in the conspiracy to murder case (Takiveikata (supra)) no consideration was given to the absolutely dire consequences to the citizens of Fiji should the plan succeed. To suddenly overthrow a government and perhaps even remove the President from office would immediately plunge the country into a state of chaos and lawlessness with the potential of a struggle for power between perhaps you, your fellow conspirators and former agents of the SDL political party which the evidence suggests you were appearing to favour.

17. It is also aggravating that you should use your respective roles of superior/subordinate when attempting to induce the Major to betray his Commission. Irrespective of any merit in your proposal that you might have been able to persuade him with, your great power and status within the RFMF would have certainly have had a dominating manipulative effect on him.

18. It was rather unpleasant at the very least for you in your evidence in defence, to tell the Court that the Major was not particularly competent in his duties. Despite that perception on your part, if indeed it was your perception, you had no hesitation in trusting him with your seditious utterances nor were you reluctant to reveal to him the" plan" and suggest ways that he might be able to help you and your co- conspirators to further that "plan".
Picture
Wheel-barrowed in by Aiyaz Khayium to overturn assessors not guilty verdict. The former Hong Kong lawyer and FICAC prosecutor now Fiji High Court judge Paul Madigan
Picture
BETRAYED: He was once seen as Bainimarama's officer-in-treason
Picture
The Reject's Revenge: Manasa Tagicakibau who couldn't take second position under Driti and Ratu Ului Mara
http://www.fijileaks.com/2/post/2013/11/consumed-with-bitterness-was-major-manasa-tagicakibau-bursting-with-jealousy-for-playing-second-fiddle-to-pita-driti-and-ului-mara-at-rfmf.html
Picture
Ratu Inoke Takiveikata, unlike fugitive Bainimarama, taking his punishment in his stride. Ironically, it was Driti and his officers who stood their ground in the 2000 mutiny as their commander Bainimarama fled through the cassava patch, even defecating in his pants from fear.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Fugitive from treason: As we can see from the above, Bainimarama had incited Driti and others to overthrow the Qarase government. And yet Madigan has the gall to read the riot act to Driti: "Incitement to Mutiny is a very serious offence. The role of the military, not only in Fiji, but in most countries of the world, is to maintain peace and law and order for the citizens of a country: for the protection of national security and to defend the organs of the State from any internal dissent. What you were proposing was the complete antithesis to these concepts....It is also aggravating that you should use your respective roles of superior/subordinate when attempting to induce the Major to betray his Commission. Irrespective of any merit in your proposal that you might have been able to persuade him with, your great power and status within the RFMF would have certainly have had a dominating manipulative effect on him. "
Picture
SCOT FREE: Aziz was the ring-leader in the plot to depose Bainimarama and Khaiyum but cut a deal to remain at large from the law. He had covered Bainimarama over the CRW soldiers murders in 2000 following the mutiny
Picture
Picture
Picture
This was especially aggravating given the evidence that the Major had come to you originally to express professional feelings of inefficacy in that he was dissatisfied with the allocation of tasks allotted to him within his role as head of the Logistical Supplies Unit ("LSU").

19. It is irrelevant that the plan did not achieve its objective or even that it was practically unachievable. As with conspiracy, the crime is committed when it is initially broached; agreement for conspiracy and attempt to incite for the instant case.

The Sentence

20. It is a matter of surprise and sadness that at your age and with your illustrious career behind you that you should come to be involved in this seditious undertaking. I take a starting point for this offence a term of 6 years' imprisonment. For the seriously aggravating features that I have referred to in paras 3, 16 and 17 above, I add a further four years to that term making a interim total of ten years. For your mitigation of clear criminal record and a truly commendable record of service to the nation I deduct a period of five years meaning that you will serve a term of imprisonment of five years.

I am not able in law to suspend a sentence of that term and in any event it would not be appropriate to suspend a sentence for such a serious and potentially destructive crime. You will serve four years of that sentence before you will be eligible for parole."

P.K. Madigan Judge At Suva ' 11 December, 2013.
Picture
17 Comments
Prison Warder
11/12/2013 12:15:37 am

We are now waiting to host Mere Samisoni, Mahendra Chaudhry and later SODELPA leadership if they win the promised 2014 election; God bless Aiyaz Khaiyum and Frank Bainimarama for keep Fiji safe

Reply
Mavolo Ni Kaivesu
11/12/2013 12:44:34 am

Prison Warder
Au sa oca na vutuka tiko nomu sona qauri qori

Reply
Fijileaks Editor
11/12/2013 12:54:40 am

Dear Commentators

We would appreciate if all your comments are free of abusive language despite your understandable anger and dislike of this illegal regime. THANKS!

Reply
Not Amused
11/12/2013 01:16:49 am

Understandable... but how much to digest when Madigan was Aiaz's mate when Aiaz was studying in Hong Kong.....

How come he did not excuse himself from the case as possible bias judge now confirmed to be biased overturning 3 assessors dnot guilty verdict.

Reply
No one is amused either
11/12/2013 03:08:27 am

People can ask questions until the cows come home.. but if navel-gazing F I J I A N S are not looking for S E N S I B L E solutions to their problems, then they're half the problem. Period.

Totally agree with blogger below (judge advocate) re rubbish tactics i.e. divisive tactics.

Judge Advocate
11/12/2013 01:34:20 am

We native Fijians dont seem to see beyond our surroundings - that these Judges will be out of jobs if they went against the regime - for that fool Driti, instead of talking had simply overthrown the regime, Madigan, Gates, Sri Lankan judges, Nazhat, Bano and Kahiyum and all other hangers on would have fled Fiji!

Sadly, Sodelpa, the racist party in waiting - will exploit Driti sentence for votes - cowards, who never confronted the regime nor did the chiefs - just blaming Indo-Fijians - which is rubbish tactics!

Reply
DPP Prosecutor
11/12/2013 08:09:47 am

The third invisible and shadowy conspirator with Pita Driti and Ratu Ului Mara was VICTOR LAL. Our thorough research of the anti-regime blog sites to which Justice Madigan referred to were articles written by Victor Lal on Aiyaz Khayium, and basis of Driti's instructions to Manasa Tagicakibau. We hope to add him to our list to join Driti in Naboro with Ului.

Reply
Rajesh
11/12/2013 10:25:05 am

DPP/Judges/Police/Army are full of regime suckers .Shame on them who dont keep the oath that they were to uphold the legal constitution and support the legal govt.
Frank/Khaiyum / Cronies time will come when you will be judged by almighty god and there no one can be bought but fair trial in gods kingdom. You guys will rot n hell for taking away the freedom and democracy from the people of Fiji.
Driti is the Hero here and you guys are bunch of Zeros.
Fijian Armies are the biggest liumuri idiots and supporting Frank/Khaiyum..
Oneday you will face the legal court too in Fiji with fair judges and legal constitution. Madigan/regime cronies will be jailed for life.
we will than free all political prisoners.

Reply
DPP Office Cleander
11/12/2013 11:06:30 am

Vinaka, Victor! Who cares if the allegations against you are true or false. Keep it coming, and hundreds and thousands follow every exposure of yours in earnest! Our day will come

Reply
Hindu Priest
11/12/2013 11:09:57 am

Yes, "our day will come". The racist SODELPA, Baba and the i-taukei gang are waiting to beat up Victor Lal's family and Indo-Fijian friends in the name of indigenous rights. Keep on backing the racist horses, Victor, you sell-out of our community. Allah hoo Akbar to Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum and Frank Bainimarama

Reply
happy go-lucky and over-fed
11/12/2013 05:30:59 pm

Clearly, the benefits of feeding off illegally from the nation's treasury trough is quite evident from the looks of those who thrive under dictatorships.

Reply
Justice Madigan's Chamber Clerk
12/12/2013 03:09:25 am

Victor, We at DPP are waiting for you, to present you before our esteemed judge Paul Madigan, to join Driti at Naboro!

Reply
Hindu Priest
12/12/2013 03:14:00 am

Victor boy! Why are you wasting your time and energy fighting on behalf of the racist indigenous Fijians an SODELPA. They will never accord you equality and rights in Fiji, forget about even allowing you to lead their party. Enjoy the new Fiji under Khaiyum and Bainimarama - Allah Who Akbar!

Reply
Hindu Devotee
12/12/2013 04:41:33 pm

Hindu Priest,

You are as racist as those you accuse to be - in this case SODELPA!

Reply
sa rauta
12/12/2013 05:06:54 pm

More like a "pretend hindu priest" the idiotic blogger 2 posts above.

It should be clear to one and all that the BaiKhaium regime and hangers-on who stand to benefit from the maintaining the status quo will do their best to sow seeds of doubt, hatred and disunity amongst Fijians at a time when we ALL need to unite against this military dictatorship. In the public arena however, they'll be seen indulging in rhetorics of unity and common destiny - as if they're indispensible for achieving those ends. tsk..tskk...

However, the same warning also goes for the minority die-hard "ethno-nationalists" who are mostly blogging from abroad (esp. in the USA) and who will most likely hide behind SODELPA (ex-SDL stalwarts).

The situation therefore calls for a CLEAR CONDEMNATION by office bearers/leaders of SODELPA if they're claiming to be inclusive... or they're going to lose votes of young, sensible and educated i-taukei who are disgusted with the "small-minded" divide and rule tactics of old used to catapult the "undeserving" to positions of leadership.

Reply
sa rauta
12/12/2013 05:22:43 pm

Btw I read on one of the blogsites a blogger mentioning that the BaiKaiyum regime should level the playing field for political campaigning and they'll see...or some words to that effect. I exclaimed out loudly - "HOW TRUE!" I am not vying for a parliamentary seat or support a particular political party but my goodness, I could possibly raise enough doubt (didn't want to say "hell on earth", lol) just as a mere citizen of this country who detests dictatorships, on illegal PM Bainimarama and his make-believe party to sway reasonably minded voters away from voting for them and thereby deny them (regime) the legitimacy that they're so desperate for.

Yes, give us a level-playing field (and there's a host of requirements that I can list that the regime needs to adhere to in order to achieve even a respectable semblance of a "level-playing field" for political campaigning).

Yes, bring it on and watch the PEOPLE floor you when it comes to voting time. OH YES, WE CAN!

Reply
Hindu Priest
13/12/2013 12:57:05 am

Victor boy is an enemy of the Indo-Fijians. SODELPA will not even make him our High Commissioner in London. Allah Who Akbar to Aiyaz Khaiyum

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    editor@fijileaks.com

    ARCHIVES

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    Picture
    Picture