Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

Fiji High Court disallows DPP's dubious $44,000 cost claims for two Hong Kong prosecutors Yang and Grossman in Chaudhry's tax case

17/10/2013

7 Comments

 
PictureMadigan
AN application for costs by the DPP against Mahendra Pal Chaudhry was refused by the Suva High Court on Wednesday.  The claim was made as a result of an application by Chaudhry to adjourn the trial date initially fixed for 23-27 September 2013 because of unavailability of his senior counsel at the time due to illness.

Suva lawyer, Anand Singh appearing for Chaudhry, claimed that the DPP was claiming bogus costs amounting to $44,000.

The claims were for airfares ($14,200) for DPP’s Hong Kong lawyers, Elizabeth Yang and senior counsel Clive Grossman.  Also included were brief preparation costs ($30,000) as well as penalties said to be charged by a Suva hotel for bookings later cancelled.

Singh claimed none of these costs had actually been incurred – they were fake claims.

A breakdown showed the claims as follows:

1. Air tickets for Elizabeth Yang for travel Hong Kong/Sydney/Nadi/Hong Kong ($10,696)

Singh noted as follows:

a. The travel never took place so it’s not a legitimate claim.  This cost was never incurred.  A reservation was made but this was later cancelled on 16 September 2013.

b. The airfare claimed was too expensive.  The claim was for Hong Kong/Sydney/Nadi/Hong Kong when there were direct Hong Kong/Nadi flights three times a week services by Fiji Airways.  Why would she have to fly via Sydney?  The cost of business class airfare Hong Kong/Nadi is $4,700 compared to the claim $10,696 lodged by the DPP.  Economy class fare is even less at approximately $2,500.

c. The claim lodged was not supported by a receipt – the DPP had provided no evidence of this amount being paid.

2. Trial Preparation costs – $14,000 for Elizabeth Yang and $16,000 for Clive Grossman – Total $30,000, claimed in Fees for “Trial Preparation”.

Singh argued that claim had no legal basis for costs.  Trial preparation costs should be paid by the DPP who had contracted the services of Ms. Yang and  Grossman.  And in any case, no preparation work was done in Fiji.

3. Hotel Surcharge $820 – claimed in penalties charged by Holiday Inn for late cancellation of booking.

Singh said this was another questionable claim.  The hotel had levied no penalty or surcharge for cancellation.  In any case, there is no penalty charged if the cancellation is made 24 hours prior to arrival. The bookings were for 21-28 September 2013. The reservations were cancelled on 17 September 2013 – no costs were therefore incurred by way of penalties.

4. Travel costs HK$15,700 ($F3,500) – for Clive Grossman listed as “Difference in cost of tickets due to rerouting” travel.

The re-routing was from Honolulu, Hawaii. Singh asked why Grossman would need to travel to Honolulu to get to Fiji when there were three direct flights to Nadi from Hong Kong. 


Was Grossman going to Honolulu on some other business but claiming costs from the DPP? 

No evidence of payment of this amount was produced by DPP.

Grossman had allegedly asked that payments due to him (F$20,000) be made in Sterling and deposited in his personal bank account in the Channel Islands, which is a tax haven.

Picture
Picture
Grossman and Yang: Travel expenses challenged
Picture
Why duo didn't take direct flight from Hong Kong on Fiji Airways?
Picture
Anand Singh with Chaudhry
Picture
Holiday Inn: The hotel had levied no penalty or surcharge for cancellation - so $820 "bogus claim"
Picture
Tax haven! Grossman allegedly wanted fees in sterling to be deposited in Channel Island bank account
Singh said it was most unusual and irregular for charges billed in Fiji and Hong Kong dollars to be converted to Sterling and paid in a country other than Hong Kong where Grossman’s practice was located.

Justice Paul Madigan disallowed the costs claimed saying that a proper case had not been made by the DPP.

7 Comments
Blog Surfer
17/10/2013 09:43:19 am

Who owns and runs Fijileaks?

Where did Fijileaks get these details from - has it made it up.

There is nothing in the Fijian newspapers or news sites like fijivillage or fijilive news!

Reply
Leaker
17/10/2013 04:19:36 pm

Who gives a monkey about who owns and runs Fijileaks. Its good to see stories here which are not published in Fiji's daily newspapers

Reply
Bill Carson
19/10/2013 09:39:10 pm

I think what Blog Surfer is getting at what you say are stories are in fact fiction or non-fiction .

abc
17/10/2013 11:40:42 pm

you expect to read this stuff in the local papers??? where u been all this time...Fiji media is under censorship mate

Reply
millioneer
19/10/2013 02:51:28 am

Did you not know that since the Regime's Interim Finance Minister was named the tax dogger Minister in Frank's Interim Govt, Fiji's media is seriously sensored to the extent they have literally picked up publishers of Fiji Sun and Fiji Times and put them on plane without evn an airline ticket...!!!

By the way it appears Madigan has ruled in MPC's favour... So is MPC still claiming he is bias?

Reply
Bill Carson
19/10/2013 08:33:20 pm

If this is a High Court decision, it should be available somewhere.

Interesting decision

Reply
Burntheconstitution
21/10/2013 01:45:54 am

it is available but not in this form...it will be rewritten to suit the corrupt DPP

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    editor@fijileaks.com

    ARCHIVES

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    Picture
    Picture