Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

iTaukei Land Trust Board (NLTB) computers hit snag following upgrade by Indian IT company; some VKB members whose names were deleted still having their lease monies disbursed to their accounts by TLTB!

17/9/2015

11 Comments

 
VKB members of Tokatoka Natauvia, Mataqali Namono,  Yavusa Cawa in Nailaga, whose names were deleted as per the investigative process by the TLFC way back in 2013, are still having their lease monies disbursed to their accounts by TLTB

"Some members who are supposed to be dead are alive and those who have been deleted or transferred through TLFC’s record are reinstated within TLTB’s computing system."

Picture
Picture
Dear Sir,

I write in regard to a matter that is being given scant public attention, but has lasting implications for both the iTaukei community as well as Fiji as a whole. There was an IT team from India working in the iTaukei Land & Fisheries Commission office extracting valuable  indigenous information from the VKB to be dispatched to other government entities such as FNPF, etc some months ago. This is being done in the name of restructuring for systems improvements.  

In the process, the TLFC is being treated as just as just another government entity – its socio-cultural (as well as political) significance is being ignored and undermined in the process. While it is agreed that systems improvements are continuously needed in government organizations, I strongly believe that any changes within the documentation system in the TLFC should only be done after thorough consultations with all stakeholders through existing forums. 

The way it was being done  I personally believe was an insult to the indigenous community especially when we ourselves cannot have direct access to that  information unless it is requested by our respective Mataqali Heads. The repercussions of this so called system upgrading is the contradicting information the TLFC and TLTB currently have in their possession now and this is evident in the flaws that is  experienced especially in the individual account lease monies process. Some members who are supposed to be dead are alive and those who have been deleted or transferred through TLFC’s record are reinstated within TLTB’s computing system. I believe this issue has to be highlighted in these columns for the community at large so that appropriate questions can be raised and discussed with the authorities as well as among the stakeholders.  

Yours
(Fijileaks: name withheld)


HISTORY NOTES FOR THE RECORD, re-published by Fijileaks on request

Picture
‘Where will you find in Fiji the
Indian sitting under the tree

his father planted.’ -

Governor Sir Arthur Richards


PictureRatu Sukuna
Ratu Sukuna and NLTB: Fact and Fiction

By Victor Lal
 
Fiji Sun
August 2005


It was one of the wisest of Fiji’s colonial governors, Sir Arthur Richards (later Lord Milverton), who first offered to Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna the seed of an idea that produced the Native Land Trust Board. But it was Ratu Sukuna who planted the seed, nourished it, and gave the resulting plant sturdy growth and permanent form.

The preceding statement is how the NLTB has portrayed the great Lauan chief to us on its official website. In other words, if it had not been for Ratu Sukuna, the Fijians would have been a ‘people without a land’. Now, a row has broken out between Professor Ron Duncan of USP and NLTB general manager, Kalivati Bakani, on the role and function of the NLTB in Fijian society. Bakani’s robust response also smacks of ‘Hello, what do you know, Professor Duncan, about the NLTB and its role as a guardian of native lands in Fiji’.

What is the truth about NLTB and Ratu Sukuna? The answer will not be found in what has been written and perpetuated by the historians, the NLTB, the Fiji Government, and Fijian nationalists on Ratu Sukuna but what has not been written on the NLTB and the Lauan chief.

It lies in the examination of the private papers of Milverton, the initial architect of the NLTB, which has been gathering dust in the University of Oxford’s Rhodes House Library, the former depositary library of colonial studies. Milverton’s private and family papers are off limits to researchers. I was however recently granted permission to re-evaluate his private papers, especially those pertaining to his governorship in Fiji nearly 70 years ago.

Let us see how Ratu Sukuna came to be involved in the creation of the NLTB.

The NLTB was created in 1940 by the Native Land Trust Ordinance (also known as the NLTO). Governor Richards landed with his family in Suva on 28 November 1936. By early February 1937 he was confronted with a major ‘Indian problem’ which was visible on the horizon:

‘What are 200,000 people in a country which could easily support ten times that number? However at their present increase the future lies with the Indians. The Fijian is so far behind.’

He also remembered one grey-haired old Indian coming to him and saying: ‘Where will you find in Fiji the Indian sitting under the tree his father planted.’ He had an Indian cook, Bala.

On 26 February 1937, in a letter to Gerald Creasy of the British Colonial Office in London, he refers for the first time to Ratu Sukuna. At the time when Richards arrived in Suva, Ratu Sukuna was on a trip to Europe paid for by ‘voluntary’ contributions from the people. Richards proposed to ask him if this were true when he returned, but he had no intention of breaking him.

‘He is too potentially valuable and he would be a very dangerous malcontent. He is 49 years of age, a member of Leg Co and votes as he pleases. I have a mind to make him my Adviser on Native Affairs. I propose to gamble a little on him, to trust him and, I hope, to use him for the good of the country in solving the land question.’

His choice was a good one. They became friends with complete trust in each other and together they worked on Richards’ plan for land reform which would radically change the old communal system. The basis of the plan rested on the fact that the Fijian community possessed five times as much land as they could use either then or at any time in the future having regard to their visible population trends, and in pointing this out in speeches which he made to Fijian assemblies in every province throughout the country.

Richards made it plain that, if they insisted on holding back and they could not hope to use, which was their prerogative, the future of their country must be troubled. With diplomatic impartiality, he went on to point out what the Indians had done to bring prosperity to their country.

He wrote to Creasy on 7 September 1937: ‘People tell me that I have the confidence of the Fijians and anyway the name of the King’s representative is still something to conjure with here. The Fijians trust the King and will take from the Governor what they would take from no one else. Perhaps with Sukuna’s help I may be able to solve the problem. My idea is to turn him on to dividing up the country into lands surrendered by them to the Crown to be held in trust and allocated at the Crown’s will on what terms it considers just to anyone, Fijian or Indian or European, but the chief objective is the Indian. No more freehold - only long leases. I should constitute a small Board of which the Governor would be Chairman and would always sit as such, to deal with difficult decisions during the land division, and afterwards to be in general control of the allocations.’

All rent revenue from the land so allocated was to be paid into a welfare fund for the benefit of the indigenous Fijian population.

Ratu Sukuna supported the plan whole-heartedly and Richards warmly acknowledged the lead which he took in persuading the chiefs to agree to it. There were already young Fijians who were impatient with the old communal system and wanted personal freedom from it, but nevertheless the readiness of the chiefs and their people to agree to the proposals was probably the finest act of trust in colonial history.

Ratu Sukuna estimated that he could draw up the most equitable division of land within two or three years.

Unfortunately, Richards was transferred to Jamaica a few months later, and although the scheme was proceeded with for a time, it was hindered by the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939 before it could be implemented. 

Fijileaks:
Last year, Kalivati Bakani pleaded guilty to five counts of abuse of office and was jailed for four years.      

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Fijileaks: The Tug-of-War between the Kepa-Naiqama factions is fast descending into a FARCE ('F***t); now complaints have been lodged against Beddoes for allegedly bringing party into dispute for posting comments on his Facebook against party president Ratu Naiqama; for Heavens Sake, if anyone who should be charged with bringing Sodelpa party into DISREPUTE, it is Naiqama for "swearing" at the Speaker Jiko Luveni, which has resulted in his two year suspension from Parliament; yes, he has appealed to the Fiji High Court against the suspension, and has publicly apologised!

Picture
11 Comments
Charlie Charlie
17/9/2015 09:58:03 am

Don't understand how can it be an insult to the indigenous community. Whoever wrote that letter seems to have 0 IT competency. To transfer data to any new system, one would need to access the older system data. There is no miracle way to transfer data otherwise. This letter is the work of an ignorant racists sob. Moce mada viti.

Reply
Tualeita
17/9/2015 07:32:36 pm

Charlie...

You forget that not all people are IT competent. Because this person, perhaps, is not knowledgeable in IT you accuse him of being a "racist sob".

Reply
King Rat
17/9/2015 09:55:20 pm

This cant be true. The disbursement of monies to individual accounts have yet to be done. I was one of the first ones to apply and I submitted the paperwork back in June. So far nothing has come through. The paperwork involved is quite complicated eg you have to provide a certified copy of your birth certificate; quote the entry number against your name in the VKB; provide a certified copy of your passport details page; apply using the appropriate Form from the ITLB etc.

Reply
Tomasi Koroi
17/9/2015 08:01:53 pm

I see a lot of emotion. The test is simple: is the new system better than the old system? i.e Is data on the finger tips of staff? Is Data correct? Does data load efficiently? These are questions which only users can answer. Management needs to know about data security, access to write privileges, back-ups, etc. We must keep emotion out of technology. Otherwise we will never get a good product. Industry is aware of scams. NTLB and Ballo Khan is well know. Another is TPAF where one Indian company did the software and nothing worked. They ran off with the money. Current Health Minister knows about this. Also ask FNPF. And also Home Finance.

Reply
Chiku
17/9/2015 09:31:00 pm

Remember what that brilliant Fijian Ratu Mosese Tuisawau said NLTB stood for : Native Land No Trust Board!,

Reply
T4Trees.
17/9/2015 10:29:06 pm

Those were the good old days of Late Sir Arthur Richards…but now we have a choice of trees -Aam, Emli or Neem- under which to sit and smoke our shit, Victor …and where some Ratus too can do their home brews.

The ‘Indian Problem’ that Late Sir Richards foresaw yonder the horizon had nothing to do with Land.

Sir Richards foresaw the ‘the Indian pain in the neck ’, that is, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum – ‘the unashamed, selfish, self-centered, self-enriching, self-righteous…and a Tyrant Puppeteer’!
A horror Indian, that not only the iTaukei but the Indo-Fijians themselves need to FEAR.

Reply
Chiku
17/9/2015 11:47:12 pm

No need to FEAR Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum. He is a small time tyrant in a banana republic. Far bigger and more ruthless tyrants have come and gone, often in disgrace if not killed by the people he oppressed. Remember what happened to the once all powerful Muammar Gaddafi' ? Khaiyum's time will come... He won't be there forever. Keep that in mind and fear of him will not trouble you.

Reply
Welcome Home
18/9/2015 04:41:21 am

At least Ratu Mo did not need a copy of Debretts Correct Form to remind him that the title 'Sir' which represents a knighthood conferred by the Monarch is ONLY used with a Christian or first given name. It correctly is placed after the local title Ratu and never precedes it. Ratu Mosese Tuisawau was a gentleman even though he lacked a knighthood.

Reply
Welcome Home
18/9/2015 04:45:58 am

Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna was in a league of his own. We may never see his like again - it is possible we do not deserve to unless the Fiji XV emerges with honour today at Twickenham to restore tarnished honour. May God go with them!

Reply
Oh No Charlie Charlie
18/9/2015 07:07:58 am

You too do not know what this person who wrote this letter meant. It appears this person knows more than what you can chew.

He maybe a forensic audit knowledgeable person who can see what you cannot see.

IS IT REALLY an IT issue?

Or is it someone or some people have got this data downloaded and having them be paid money into some fund that the money gets banked into some staff's personal bank account in due course if it has just not yet begun.

SO COULD THIS BE A FRAUD someone is trying to have dead people back in the books.

SO IT MUST BE INVESTIGATED...

Reply
A Hobbit
21/9/2015 03:21:37 am

Please note that Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna was registered in his mother's clan in Lau and ascended to the position of Tui Lau and Tui Nayau. His father is Ratu Jone Madraiwiwi whose father was Ratu Mara an older brother of Ratu Seru Cakobau.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Contact Email
    ​[email protected]
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012