"The revocation of the 1997 Constitution was not made within the doctrine of necessity and such revocation was unconstitutional and of no effect. The 1997 Constitution is the supreme and extant law of Fiji today." Justice Anthony Gates in [2000] 2 FLR 89; Chandrika Prasad v. Att-Gen of Fiji Prasad v. Republic of Fiji & Another [2001]. Justice Gates (left) and Shaista Shameem (right); Shameem had filed the case on behalf of Chandrika Prasad via the Fiji Human Rights Commission. Justice Gates in 2000: "The matter was first called before the court on 14th July 2000. I indicated to Dr. Shameem, who first appeared for the Applicant to assist him, and to Mr. Udit for the Respondents that there was a need for the affidavit material to provide evidence of the acceptance or non-acceptance of the military takeover and of the consequent government. Time was allowed for the Applicant and the Respondents, to place such evidence before the court. The Applicant availed himself of this opportunity by filing 2 further affidavits. The Respondents, elected not to do so." JIKO LUVENI FIRST TO HITCH RIDE ON BAINIMARAMA'S POLITICAL ROAD SHOW Current Minister for Women, Social Welfare and Poverty Alleviation, Dr Jiko Luveni, will join Mr Bainimarama as he travels around the country on a bus to seek support, ahead of the country's September 17 election. Dr Luveni told Pacific Beat she has been visiting the remote Lau Group of Islands in Fiji's east and has received a positive response from constituents. "They have much more positively and freely made positive statements about this country, about this government and are aware that they have actually benefited from the development programs the government is actually doing," she said. Other parties have been required to register for the election, but Fiji First is yet to do so. Dr Luveni says this is because the interim government still has policy goals it needs to achieve. "We still need to complete this and we really would like to complete all the work that we have been doing," she said. The elections will be the first in Fiji since Mr Bainimarama led a military coup to seize power in December 2006. Opponents have criticised the Fiji First campaign, claiming it is being funded by the public purse. Critics say it is also inappropriate for Mr Bainimarama to use the country's emblem on the side of his bus. Audio: Fiji's minister for women Dr Jiko Luveni speaks to Pacific Beat (ABC News) |
12 Comments
Copyright Holder
1/4/2014 07:40:35 am
When will Khaiyum and Bainimarama issue a statement regarding the name; and when will the toady media, Fiji Sun, Fijivillage and FBC go and ask them. They are quite but have been very quick to dismiss the use of Fiji's Coat of Arms on the bus!
Reply
Anit Singh
1/4/2014 07:55:12 am
Fiji First Party reiterates its principled stand, believing in the sanctity of the 1997 Constitution - as a living document.
Reply
Rajesh
1/4/2014 01:18:44 pm
Anit good on you .
Reply
Interesting Scenario
1/4/2014 12:50:45 pm
Can Fiji Pensioners - show list of the founding members of Fiji First Party where there were names of Fiji Human Rights Fiji Group members a party to this political party?
Reply
Victim
1/4/2014 03:51:44 pm
Thank you Shaista for standing up for Indo-Fijian rights, even if it meant transgressing the line of duty
Reply
Victim 2
1/4/2014 05:08:51 pm
Not just Indo-Fijians doce; see Silatolu's case http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2002/69.html
Reply
Victim 1
1/4/2014 05:47:47 pm
Good Revelation
1/4/2014 05:34:47 pm
The article by Dr Shameem CONFIRM it was Anthony Gates himself who pushed Chandrika Prasad (the applicant appointed by the Camp residents') to provide affidavit material towards evidence of the acceptance or non-acceptance of the military takeover and of the consequent government.
Reply
Democratic Fiji
5/4/2014 02:22:24 pm
Great revelation Dr Shameem. Keep it up.. you doing great.
Reply
Accountability
1/4/2014 06:37:57 pm
It is news to us that FHRC claimed to have formed the Refugee Camp. Were they receiving chunks of donations from NGO's or were they using FHRC's fundings.
Reply
Victim 1
5/4/2014 12:04:23 am
Indeed Shaista and her FHRC did not pay any money into the refugee camp. But instead made money from Court as Court Cost of about $50,000 for Chandrika Prasad Case when lawyers had said they were volunteering pro bono to do the case. They never gave it to either Chandrika Prasad or to the refugee camp. Same as Mahen Chaudhry and FCOSS who received $124,000 from NZ Foreign Ministry for appeal made by NZ Group. They too kept all the money they got under the name of refugee camp.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
[email protected]ARCHIVES
September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 |