Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

ROBIN Nair flapping his wings against Frank Bainimarama has sent the media into a frenzy but CORRESPONDENCE on us reveal a  controversial and dark side to his character and crusade against his adoptive Australia

21/7/2017

11 Comments

 

Robin Nair claims that he left the Fijian government because of interference in the conduct of his duties. Yet his correspondence with Bainimarama shows that when he was Ambassador to the UAE,  he had no compunction whatsoever about going over the heads of both his permanent secretary at the time, Esala Nayasi, and his minister at the time, Ratu Inoke Kubuabola, to contact  Bainimarama directly and urge him to embrace a particularly contentious course of action against Australia and New Zealand - he had no authority to meddle from UAE

"Sir, we had a brief discussion but I think a timely and important discussion, touching on our presence at the PIF Summit next week.  I had briefly discussed with you my concern with the speed with which we are normalizing our relations with ANZ [Australia and New Zealand], as if nothing happened in the last 8 years and that they can pick up their relationship with us where they left us in 2006. We are doing this at the expense of your deeply felt grievance against ANZ at how they treated us with contempt, at how they tried to strangle Fiji and annihilate you from 2006 until most recently when Julie Bishop initiated her cleverly orchestrated charm offensive to woo Fiji back into their fold. She did this because ANZ were frightened by what Fiji had been able to achieve, under your leadership, without them. They believe that the South Pacific Ocean is their lake and no-one else should usurp their leadership and control of the region. They resented that your revolution had succeeded both domestically and regionally and internationally."
Robin Nair to Frank Bainimarama, 4 September 2015


Picture

NAIR was brought in by Bainimarama to reform the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) but has left a terrible mess behind as he was ordered to "fly out of the messy nest". Incidentally, the ingratiating, obsequious tone of his correspondence published below was a feature of Nair's correspondence with Bainimarama right up to the time he was terminated. He repeatedly adopted a grovelling posture and kept telling Bainimarama that he (Bainimarama) presided over the best government in Fiji's history. What a difference a day makes! Moreover, in his correspondence, Nair is urging a foreign leader (Bainimarama) to adopt a much tougher line against Australia and especially in relation to Fiji's re-engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum. It is, many Australians would claim, a startling betrayal of his duty to Australia as a citizen and a retired diplomat on an Australian Government pension

Picture
Fijileaks:

1. Robin Nair claims that he left the Fijian government because of interference in the conduct of his duties. Yet this correspondence below shows that when he was Ambassador to the UAE,  he had no compunction whatsoever about going over the heads of both his permanent secretary at the time, Esala Nayasi, and his minister at the time, Ratu Inoke Kubuabola, to contact Prime Minister Bainimarama directly and urge him to embrace a particularly contentious course of action against Australia and New Zealand that they would not have supported.

2. In this correspondence, Nair is advocating a much tougher line against Australia and New Zealand than even Bainimarama had contemplated and certainly Kubuabola, who had established a good working relationship with the then Australian Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, and was trying to mend fences and improve the relationship between Fiji and Australia. As this correspondence demonstrates, this effort was being undermined from within by Nair.

3. Robin Nair is an Australian citizen and a long-standing former member of the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The following is his DFAT career according to his own LinkedIn entry: 

Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)
Dates Employed Aug 1985 – Mar 2008 Employment Duration 22 yrs 7 mos
Location Canberra, Australia
Diplomatic and International Relations at Headquarters in Canberra, including Director of Tasmanian State Office of DFAT (2000-2004); Deputy Head of Mission, Australian Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina (1996 to 2000); Deputy Head of Mission, Australian Embassy in Ankara, Turkey (1988-1991).

Yet in this correspondence, Nair is urging a foreign leader (Bainimarama) to adopt a much tougher line against Australia and especially in relation to Fiji's re-engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum. It is a startling betrayal of his duty to Australia as a citizen and a retired diplomat on an Australian Government pension.

4. This constitutes clear evidence of disloyalty, even treasonous behaviour, against Australia - where Nair still lives - on top of the disloyalty he has shown to his former patron, Bainimarama, but turning against him after Bainimarama decided in April that Nair could no longer be trusted because he was undermining him as PM and Foreign Minister and asked the Chair of the Public Service Commission, Vishnu Mohan, to remove him. Nair continues to falsely claim that he resigned voluntarily yet has since asked the PSC to pay out the full term of his contract.

5. Nair has begun to play a role in domestic Fijian politics, to the extent of issuing his own media releases. He has indicated his interest in contesting a seat in the Fijian Parliament on behalf of the NFP. But Fijian voters have every right to ask him where his true allegiances lie. This correspondence constitutes conclusive proof not only of an obsequious relationship with Bainimarama when he saw that there was an advantage in currying favour with him but of undermining the interests of his country of adoption - Australia - and actively working to cruel any rapprochement between Fiji and Australia after the difficulties in the relationship in the wake of 2006.
Picture
From: "Robin Nair" <_____________.com>
Date: 4 Sep 2015 5:13 pm
Subject: PIF
To: "frank josaia" <______________.com>


Sir, we had a brief discussion but i think a timely and important discussion, touching on our presence at the PIF Summit next week. 

I had briefly discussed with you my concern with the speed with which we are normalizing our relations with ANZ, as if nothing happened in the last 8 years and that they can pick up their relationship with us where they left us in 2006. We are doing this at the expense of your deeply felt grievance against ANZ at how they treated us with contempt, at how they tried to strangle Fiji and annihilate you from 2006 until most recently when Julie Bishop initiated her cleverly orchestrated charm offensive to woo Fiji back into their fold. She did this because ANZ were frightened by what Fiji had been able to achieve, under your leadership, without them. They believe that the South Pacific Ocean is their lake and no-one else should usurp their leadership and control of the region. They resented that your revolution had succeeded both domestically and regionally and internationally.

 I attach a short document that I prepared arguing why we should not be at the PIF at the level that we will be represented for now. ANZ believe they have already achieved 95 in wooing Fiji back to their noose or trap of their colonialist institution of the PIF. They believe that it is matter of short time only when you will be personally back into the fold, with your attendance at the next Leaders Meeting or soon afterwards, without ANZ conceding anything nor showing any regrets for how offensively they had treated us.

My thesis, sir, is that we have moved too fast rather than through a considered and progressive path, achieving our own objectives and national interests, and with the dignity earned over the past 8 years. It is still not too late to send a token delegation to PIF Summit next week because we are members. But we will be betraying your revolution if we were to be present at the level of the Foreign Minister, to almost fully be part and parcel of PIF in such a short period.

I hope you will find time to read the brief document attached with issues raised for your consideration.

 I will prepare another fuller paper on how we should be re-engaging with ANZ.

 with much respect

Robin Nair
Ambassador
Embassy of the Republic of Fiji
Abu Dhabi
Tel: +971 2 681 3002
 Mob:+971 50 224 6888


Sir,
I briefly discussed with you this morning my concern with the speed with which we are normalising the relations with ANZ and the PIF, as if nothing happened in the last 8 years and that they can pick up with us where they left us in 2006. We are doing this at the expense of your deeply felt grievance against ANZ at how they tried to strangle Fiji and annihilate you from 2006 until most recently when Julie Bishop initiated a cleverly orchestrated charm offensive to woo Fiji back, by saying the right words and throwing money at us, as they do with other PSIDS. She did this because they were frightened by what Fiji had been able to achieve without them, so much so that their position as the vice-Sherriff of the South Pacific region was being eroded by Fiji’s smart diplomacy. They have always believed that the South Pacific is their lake.

During the course of our experience post 2006, we had grown and matured because of the attempts by ANZ to isolate us and make us a Pariah State. You resisted and persisted on your planned path to full sovereignty. During that time we realised that PIF had been an instrument of colonisation. We agreed internally that when the time came for ANZ to realise that you had succeeded in your revolution, any normalisation of relations will not be automatic as if the last 8 years did not happen. We agreed that any normalisation of relations with ANZ will be done in progressive steps and one within a context of agreed/negotiated set of principles, recognising Fiji as an equal partner and not a subservient and submissive partner. We had agreed and said it publicly many times that we did not need PIF as it was presently constituted and we will not join it unless PIF became a true voice of the Pacific Islands again. We showed ANZ and PSIDS that we were serious and we showed them the way through the launching of your PIDF initiative.

But what do we see now, post 12 September 2014. Our relationship with ANZ has been rushed by your advisers (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and no different from what it was pre2006, because we fell for their charm offensive, not realising that is exactly where the ANZ want us to be. They considered our tough talk of the past as mere rhetoric, when you in fact were determined and serious and showed how rhetoric can be made into real action and gain for our national interest.

Now, I see our membership with PIF is almost normal. Overnight we have been sucked into all the organs and bodies of the PIF and we participate fully in these Fora. We are even going to be present at the first PIF Summit Meeting after the elections of September 2014, less than a year ago, and with a high level delegation led by our Foreign Minister. ANZ see your principled stand of not attending the PIF Summit as a token protest at best. They see this as a face saving measure after your 8 years of showing deep resentment and antagonism towards ANZ for treating us like naughty children and not a sovereign nation. ANZ believe they have already achieved 95 in wooing Fiji back to their noose or trap of their colonialist institution of the PIF. They believe that it is matter of short time only when you will be personally back into the fold, with your attendance at the next Leaders Meeting or soon thereafter, without ANZ conceding anything nor showing any regrets for how offensively they had treated us, by trying to starve us out of all the regional and international organisations.

My thesis, sir, is that we have moved too fast rather than through a considered and progressive path, achieving our own objectives and national interests, rather than to do this progressively and with the dignity earned over the past 8 years. It is still not too late to send a token delegation to PIF Summit next week because we are members. But we will be betraying your revolution to almost fully be part and parcel of PIF in such a short period.

As for the argument that our lack of presence would upset Island Leaders, I think it is a very cruel and ill-considered argument, one to justify capitulation. These Island leaders never gave us a second thought when they so unashamedly kicked us out of the PIF, with offensive and demeaning rhetoric of some of these leaders towards you and Fiji. Some of these leaders only reluctantly and in a lukewarm showed support for your “Engaging of the Pacific Islands” initiative, with lower levels of representations, to the amusement of the ANZ. Even now, they speak with forked tongues about PIDF. Not many Leaders want to be seen at the opening ceremonies of PIDF, so graciously hosted by us every year.

Your PIDF initiative is now being seen and accepted by many in the broader international community, especially amongst our “new” friends as an emerging premier organisation of the Pacific Islands voice, by sending observers and indicating public support. Some have sent very high level representations, including last year with the presence of the President of Indonesia. The PSIDS are beginning to realise and quietly embrace the PIDF, slowly but surely.  Our less than full participation in the PIF will not upset leaders but show the leaders a way to achieve meaningful sovereignty. We want to keep on this path rather than get seduced into the PIF. ANZ is already considering adopting our model of the tripartite body for PIF or, at least to start with, in some organs of PIF. This is to dilute our argument of PIDF being tripartite and grass roots. We are on a winner, sir, with the PIDF and let us concentrate on that.

Our relations with ANZ should not be through any regional mechanism such as PIF. where their habit of dominance will not mellow. We should retain our pride and our sovereignty by dealing with Australia and New Zealand on a bilateral basis, as equals, a mature relationship between two sovereign countries: Fiji and Australia and separately Fiji and NZ. But even this should be built progressively on the basis of a set of principles.

As promised to you this morning, I will do a Paper for you on re-engaging with ANZ.

Sir, you sent us out to make new friends in the world. You have been successful. We have many more friends than we had pre 2006. We have found a new sense of freedom and sovereignty.

Robin Nair

Picture

How TRUTHFORFIJI cartoonist saw Robin Nair's departure from MOFA!

Picture
11 Comments
Tota
21/7/2017 09:57:01 am

Hahaha
Thanks Victor for giving the other side of Robin nair, the nasty one. Wanting to be Robin hood this fella

Reply
Ratu
21/7/2017 01:50:26 pm

Australia is a big country and s member of the OECD, the rich boys club. They are not really bothered by a tin pot dictator in piddly old Fiji. They could invade and take over Fiji not in days but in hours. They won't be bothered by the personal views of a former low level diplomat. The dominance of Australia in the Pacific Forum pointed out by Nair is actually true and he rightly advises Bainimarama not to rush back in. His words to Bai were fawning but Bai is such a person who appreciates having his neck tickled. If that that is the best way to get Voreqe to support a change then so be it. In management literature it is called "managing upwards."

Reply
Moses
21/7/2017 04:09:53 pm

This a real David and Goliath show being played out on Fijileaks. Robin Nair indeed appears to have successfully under the skin of the dictators for them to attack him with orange and apple argument. What has his advice to his Minister, if not concocted by the regime, got to do with the price of fish, that the regime Prime Minister is another Trump like character to think he is above tbe law.

Reply
Tui
21/7/2017 04:25:28 pm

The comments attributed to Fijileaks appears to have been written professionaly, written by a stooge of the regime. Is it Qorvis again meddling with internal affairs of Fiji. If these pieces were indeed written by Robin Nair to his Prime Minister, have they been leaked by the Prime Minister to demean the courage of a common man to challenge the legality of the Prime Minister's illegal actions. What is the dark side that is being revealed? Or is it the dark side of this government being revealed. Nair must be a very important man for the regime to feel that it needs to squash him like a mosquito, with all the might of a tax payer paid government. Pls grow some hair on your chest to listen to a messenger instead of shooting him with a juvenile arrow to silence the truth.

Reply
Namaste Bula
21/7/2017 04:34:10 pm

If these are indeed leaked advice of a public servant to a Minister, no public servant would now dare advise his Minister on serious issues of State. Fiji has indeed become a Banana Republic. Is there any further that this regime can stoop to. Where is the good governance it proclaims or is this slogan anymore deceptive than the Talanoa Sessions the regime PM is promoting, for example in Brisbane this week. What a hoax!

Reply
Desperate
21/7/2017 11:52:43 pm

A desperate attempt by a desperate government, a government in crisis obviously and losing credibility with the people. It now had to climb down from the tree tops to eat humble pie. It has to use a blog site that it has attacked viciously and tried over the years to annihilate, to leak internal sensitive advice sought by a Prime Minister from his nominated expert. The Government attributes this advice to Robin Nair. I ask everyone to read it. If that is the quality of advice being given to our Ministers by our civil servants, we should be applauding it. We should not collude with a government that can leak such high quality advice, given in Fiji's national interest, to call the author, whoever he or she may be, as their "dark side". This was a man doing his job he was paid to do and please, not "flapping his wings". Again this is intimidation tactic being used against their most senior civil servants but this desperate government is not smart enough to know that it is shooting its own feet by so easily being disloyal its civil servants. We must question also the timing of this two year old advice. Desperate times these days, I guess.

Reply
Bhuduu
22/7/2017 12:19:00 am

Desperate, even a no school bhuduu can read between the lines. Robin Nair was a mere Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates who had NO RIGHT to go behind Kubuabola's back to advise Frank against Australia. He was not Foreign Secretary in 2015 but someone who has been caught backstabbing his adoptive country of Australia

Reply
Desperate
22/7/2017 12:57:47 am

Master budhu will remain a budhu if he cannot read between the lines attributed to Fijileaks. It is professionally written piece against Nair. Budhu, how can Nair be disloyal to the PM when he was asked to advise directly. You have not possibly worked in the civil service. I also note that Nair has been alleged to have said that he would contest the elections for NFP. I thought that he had merely joined the NFP as an ordinary member presumably to support its policies and beliefs. I don't think he has presumed himself to be a candidate. Has he applied to be a candidate. I am told no. How has he committed treason against the Australian Govt when he has not worked for them since 2008 but worked for his country of birth in its civil service. What is treasonous in his advice, if that is advice.

Reply
Vosota link
22/7/2017 02:04:25 am



Robin Nair's emails to Frank Bainimarama should be viewed correctly as invaluable advice from a staunchly loyal and concerned civil servant - an honorable diplomat who had Fiji and its national interests at heart.

No doubt Frank must have greatly appreciated Nair's views and opinions at the time.

.



Reply
John
22/7/2017 09:25:43 am

Robyn, stop playing the angel. You are dealing with a snake. Be wise. Think ....think .....think.

Reply
Rajend Naidu
25/7/2017 01:47:26 am

Editor,
Lying For The Boss
In his letter to The Age ( 25/7 ) Ian Wood says he thinks " Sean Spencer deserves a pat on the back. For six months he stood up in front of the media everyday and told lies for his boss".
Who all deserve a pat on their backs for doing Sean Spencer in post coup Fiji?
Robin Nair?
The gang who went to Geneva to tell the UN that human rights was in very good shape in the Bainimarama dictatorship?
Hands up all you lieutenants who " told lies for [the] boss" for six months or more?
Sincerely,
Rajend Naidu

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    editor@fijileaks.com

    ARCHIVES

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    Picture
    Picture