Fijileaks
  • Home
  • Archive Home
  • In-depth Analysis
    • BOI Report into George Speight and others beatings
  • Documents
  • Opinion
  • CRC Submissions
  • Features
  • Archive

SHAREHOLDER HARI PUNJA steps into the scrum as Aiyaz Khaiyum re-writes agreement forcing Fiji TV to pay 90 per cent and FBC 10 per cent; Punja protests to Bainimarama

15/12/2014

13 Comments

 

BREAKING NEWS: Fiji TV CEO Tevita Gonelevu and Fiji TV
head of content Tanya Waqanika have been sacked

Picture
FIJILEAKS: Who is Aiyaz Khaiyum to say that Fiji TV get licence on six month basis only?

Now Hari Punja joins the fray, as Fiji TV’s second largest shareholder and the country’s best-known businessman makes direct protest to Bumbling Frank about Television Cross-Carriage Fiasco


Fijileaks has been told by reliable sources that the country’s best-known businessman Hari Punja has made a furious representation to Bainimarama about the anti-business conduct of Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.

This, after learning that Fiji TV – owned 26 percent by his corporate holding Hari Punja and Sons Ltd– has been forced by Aiyaz to accept a completely lop-sided deal in which Fiji TV pay 90 percent, and FBC TV only 10 percent, of the TV rights fee due for the IRB/World Rugby Ltd 7s contract even though the coverage is being shared equally between Fiji TV and the government’s FBC TV.

FBC is headed by the Aiyaz's brother Riyaz who was parachuted into the post to the astonishment of the FBC board, and promptly built up more than $22m dollars of borrowings with the Fiji Development Bank, in the creation of FBC TV. Repayments on principal and interest are estimated to be hemorrhaging FBC’s balance sheet at the rate of up to $300,000 per month.

Fiji TV’s original proposal was to split the rights fee on a 50:43:7 basis in line with Aiyaz's much proclaimed analysis - produced by Carus, Qorvis’ in-house research company – that rights fee and sponsorships would be split according to a 50:43:7 split reflecting the share of FBC TV, Fiji TV and Mai TV respectively.

Given that Mai TV (and their 7 percent of share) were excluded from the last-minute, face-saving deal cobbled together by an embarrassed and out-of-his depth Aiyaz, Fiji TV’s second proposal in writing was a 50:50 split – with Fiji TV’s absorbing Mai TV’s share.

This was rejected by the Aiyaz himself, who intervened himself to set the proportions at 90:10.

The value of the TV rights deal is understood to be USD129,000 per season (or $245,000), meaning Fiji TV will pay US116,000 ($220,400) and FBC TV an insignificant USD13,000 ($24,600). It is a fair assumption that a similar split will be demanded by Aiyaz for the 2015 Rugby World Cup which is also to be shared between the two stations.

Punja’s fury underscores a galloping sense of alarm within the business community that the government is willing to sacrifice the basic tenets of commerce on the altar of political expediency and score-settling at which the erratic and vengeful Aiyaz is a master.

Mai TV’s tiny, advertising-led budget has been used cautiously and wisely by its shareholders and yet has produced some memorable locally-produced programmes and home-grown talent. Mai TV came to purchase the FIFA World Cup 2014 after winning the trust of the FIFA rights holders with a long build-up of more marginal programming, including youth, indoor and women’s football, over several years.

By contrast FBC TV’s existence has been entirely taxpayer or FDB-funded, completely distorting the media market, to the disadvantage of Mai TV who were forced to give up the 2014 FIFA World Cup, the first event captured by the Television (Cross-Carriage of Designated Events) Decree 2014, with one stroke of Aiyaz's pen.

(‘That worked out beautifully,’ as Aiyaz told Parliament on December 9 – without a trace of shame or irony – of the FIFA World Cup 2014 being hijacked by the Cross-Carriage Decree.)

Although Punja is no longer a director of Fiji TV – he resigned in 2011 to comply with the 2010 Media Decree which allowed for an individual to have only one directorship per media company – he had been up to that point the station’s longest serving director, starting in 1996. He remains a shareholder and director of Communications Fiji Ltd.

Far from being a passive player in Fiji TV’s affairs (or noted anti-government figure), in 2012 Hari Punja and Sons Ltd helped the government by buying out their 14 percent in Fiji TV, 1.442m shares at $2.40 a share, according to a published statement.

Fiji TV have signed off on the embarrassing deal, presumably as part of trying to roll over their six-month license which is in the sole gift of Aiyaz to extend or cancel. The licence runs out on December 31.

Suva accountant Iowane Naiveli – chairman of Fijian Holdings, the 61 percent majority owner of Fiji TV – formally signed off on Aiyaz's risible deal but negotiations will no doubt have been handled by the Sri Lankan Nouzab Fareed who is FHL’s chief executive. Fareed is part of an increasingly visible Sri Lankan cabal of pro-regime supporters that also takes in senior management figures in Vodafone, ATH and CJ Patel, as well as key judicial figures.

In this squalid and tawdry affair, as Fiji under Frank slips closer and closer to the kleptocracy of Mugabe’s Zimbabwe - at least Hari Punja is fighting the good fight on behalf of shareholders everywhere. Who in Fijian Holdings (whose stated corporate purpose remains:  "To accelerate the participation of indigenous Fijians in the commercial sector and in doing so, enhance their socio-economic standing") is looking after the interest of their indigenous shareholders?

Given that shareholding in the main Fijian Holdings listed company remains only open to indigenous Fijians (interested new shareholders still have to present their I Vola ni kawa bula extract along with the share-purchase order), how long before indigenous Fijians will wake up to the reality of what is being done to ‘their’ company, ‘their’ TV station, using ‘their’ national team/sport?
13 Comments
Peacock
15/12/2014 11:13:30 pm

Most of us have had a gutfull of the AG's posturing and preening, like he is god's gift to Fiji. Can't stand him for another minute.

Reply
FIJI FIRST PARTY
15/12/2014 11:19:17 pm

FijiLeaks, You have asked the most Pertinent Question;

Just Who is Khaiyum in a 'democratic' Fiji to "BLACKMAIL" a business on a ridiculous (and unheard of) policy of six monthly License Renewals?? How crazy is this?? Why is this??

Khaiyum your Dictatorship has been rigged over into a Democracy now -or has it not?

FijiTV is Local. FijiTV is independent. FijiTV was a pioneering business which has had to find its feet and struggle -but it has steadily grown. FijiTV suffered colossal demolition of its equipment and premises, at the hands of the hooligans following GS attempted 2000 Coup. But it bravely carried on. There was no other TV which provided such a ‘crucial’ service, then, to Fiji People, in those dark days. Our Hats-Off to FijiTV!

What an IDIOT is this AS-Khaiyum ?? – Apart from being our standing ‘Parliamentary Liar’ and an ‘Intellectual Property CHOR (Thief).

Reply
dOsoMEthing Qorvis
15/12/2014 11:34:02 pm

Qorvis, your Donkey is loose in our China-shop - Do something -Or is it not part of your brief ?

Reply
ISA NOQU VITI
16/12/2014 03:56:06 am

Question is will FHL shareholders do something about it eg change the CEO? Or will they just let it go and continue to eat shyte like the last 8 or 9 years.

Reply
Aiyaz Dictates - Rest follow.
16/12/2014 10:47:58 pm

A company on a six monthly 'life-lease' can only enter into employment contracts for the six months durations. Sorry Gonelevu!

Reply
Kavita
16/12/2014 02:47:11 pm

Kaiyum is simply implementing his thesis. He will marginalize our I-Taukei brothers and sisters.

Reply
Pitiable CHORS
16/12/2014 10:43:34 pm

This disgraceful CHOR Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum is LYING Again!

How can CHOR Aiyaz be ‘forcing’ FijiTV to foot 90% and the FBC 10% of the sponsorship costs when the CHOR Minister, himself explained to the ‘Madam Speaker’, in the Parliament of Fiji, in a televised grandstanding, that there is a ‘manner’ of cost sharing according to the percentage viewership of each TV station, and which such percentage was established by the “In-House” research group of QORVIS.

Just What is this CHOR Aiyaz diddling on and on and on about Now??

Bainimarama and Aiyaz are the pitiable CHORS of our country.

And if they don’t like being called ‘pitiable’ CHORS, then they should (with the ‘amazing lawyering’ skills at their disposal) SUE the FIJI FIRST PARTY, for calling them the ‘pitiable’ CHORS that they actually and exactly are – pitiable CHORS!

Reply
Questions for QORVIS
16/12/2014 11:13:30 pm

1.-O' QORVIS - Was your research establishing percentage of TV viewership in Fiji part of your $3 Million dollar brief - or was that just for 'make-up' for Voreqe??
2. How did these CORRUPT lot got in touch with you guys in USA??
3. Does QORVIS have any social conscience or qualms doing business with treasonists ??

Reply
O' Qorvis ??
16/12/2014 11:17:10 pm

Was the gross misuse of our national Flag and emblem (which we attained at our independence -signifying our FREEDOM) part of your PR campaign for the Dictator's Party??

Reply
Go - Qorvis - Go
16/12/2014 11:19:46 pm

Qorvis WON Fiji elections - Congratulations!

Qorvis should Return our $3Million dollar TAX Money. The CIA should be informed of their covert (and illegal) Fiji operations.

Reply
BulletProof..Really?
17/12/2014 01:26:02 am

Aiyaz is certainly in need of another RMS from Qorvis.

RMS is 'Reputation Management Strategy'. Why? Because Aiyaz's reputation as an 'Intellectual Property Chor (Thief) is very famous and now he has gained another as a LIAR and that too in the sanctity of Fiji's Parliament, in an internationally (cross-carriage) televised session. Imagine that!

But Read What Else is on offer from QORVIS :

“…An online attack on your reputation will damage your brand’s credibility, inflate bad press and ultimately decrease leads and sales. Our bulletproof reputation- management strategies help ensure that when users search your company’s name, or the name of your executives, they will find what you want them to find. We counter the negative and add to the positive, through the full array of media gateways and third-party support. In the end, your reputation will be strong, positive and accurate.”

http://www.qorvis.com/services/reputation-management

Reply
Whatta ?
17/12/2014 02:07:11 am

$3Million Dollars (USD?) worth of Reputation Management Strategies ?? ...Whow Whatta Reputation !

Reply
Isa...
17/12/2014 02:13:26 am

Isa...Moce Gonelevu. Moce Waqanika.

Ooi and...Bula mada Aslam Khan.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Contact Email
    ​[email protected]
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012