ELECTION HAS COME AND GONE: On 17 November 2022, seven Fijian women of all races had filed a constitutional redress case to challenge the legality of the new legislation requiring women to change their names to their married names in their birth certificates if they wished to vote in their married names under which they were already registered to vote, or to otherwise use their married names for legal purposes. Given the urgency of the case, and fundamental constitutional and democratic right to VOTE, Kumar should have made the case a priority, and delivered a speedy judgment, like he had done in the past for his FFP buddy PARVEEN BALA on whether Bala could contest the 2014 election. Of course, as expected, he had ruled in Bala's favour, and against the Fiji Electoral Commission. In the current constitutional case, he wrapped himself in the judicial sari and did sweet b*****all.LOOKING back at our Fijileaks archives, we have run scores of articles against Chief Justice KAMAL KUMAR, arguing he was incompetent, his judgments could be called into question, in some cases even flawed, and that he is a FFP appointed lackey Judge, and is notoriously slow in delivering urgent judgments because he is allegedly NOT fit to write judgments on his own accord without assistance from outside the Judicial Chambers.Comments are closed.
|
Contact Email
[email protected] Archives
July 2025
|